<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://feeds.captivate.fm/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"><channel><atom:link href="https://feeds.captivate.fm/aei-unprecedential/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><title><![CDATA[Unprecedential]]></title><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 14:47:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><generator>Captivate.fm</generator><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><copyright><![CDATA[Copyright © American Enterprise Institute]]></copyright><managingEditor>American Enterprise Institute</managingEditor><itunes:summary><![CDATA[What does it mean to be a Constitutional Republic? Join host Adam White, producer Tal Fortgang, and guests as they examine the roles of Congress, the president, the courts, and many other American institutions in keeping a republic.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><itunes:owner><itunes:name>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author><description>What does it mean to be a Constitutional Republic? Join host Adam White, producer Tal Fortgang, and guests as they examine the roles of Congress, the president, the courts, and many other American institutions in keeping a republic.</description><link>https://www.aei.org</link><atom:link href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" rel="hub"/><itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Get the latest from Adam J. White]]></itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><itunes:category text="Government"></itunes:category><itunes:category text="History"></itunes:category><itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"><itunes:category text="Philosophy"/></itunes:category><itunes:new-feed-url>https://feeds.captivate.fm/aei-unprecedential/</itunes:new-feed-url><item><title>Unprecedential goes on summer break: Adam and Elayne look back, and look ahead</title><itunes:title>Unprecedential goes on summer break: Adam and Elayne look back, and look ahead</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>After fifteen months and 46 episodes, Unprecedential is packing up and going to the beach. Today’s episode features Adam and Elayne reflecting on their favorite<strong> </strong>conversations thus far. They also draw out some general lessons about constitutional governance from the wide-ranging insights brought by guests.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;</p><p>In the meantime, watch out for bonus episodes this summer and, later on, a revamped show with a new format. Stay tuned!</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After fifteen months and 46 episodes, Unprecedential is packing up and going to the beach. Today’s episode features Adam and Elayne reflecting on their favorite<strong> </strong>conversations thus far. They also draw out some general lessons about constitutional governance from the wide-ranging insights brought by guests.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;</p><p>In the meantime, watch out for bonus episodes this summer and, later on, a revamped show with a new format. Stay tuned!</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">de4de271-87ab-44d5-bfc9-438aa5156c91</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/d466fe24-d13b-4ae5-ab70-6d455dc14d61/un-ep47-2021-07-22-haitus-announcement.mp3" length="26499556" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>27:36</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>47</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Is America&apos;s criminal justice system truly just? Judge Jed Rakoff argues for reform</title><itunes:title>Is America&apos;s criminal justice system truly just? Judge Jed Rakoff argues for reform</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>The Bill of Rights provides a great number of protections for accused and convicted&nbsp;criminals: it promises trial by jury;&nbsp;it&nbsp;prohibits “cruel and unusual” punishment. And in this system, defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Yet few criminal indictments today&nbsp;are actually decided&nbsp;by a full trial; instead, prosecutors have many points of leverage, and&nbsp;defendants have strong incentives to plead guilty. Are these tools and incentives good for constitutional government?</p><p>Judge Jed Rakoff, of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, recently&nbsp;published a book arguing for major reforms:&nbsp;“<a href="https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374289997" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><u>Why the Innocent Plead Guilty and the Guilty Go Free: And Other Paradoxes of Our Broken Legal System</u></a><u>.</u>” On April 29, 2021, he participated in a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.aei.org/events/why-the-innocent-plead-guilty-and-the-guilty-go-free-a-book-event-with-judge-jed-s-rakoff/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><u>public web event</u></a>&nbsp;with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><u>Adam</u></a><u>,</u>&nbsp;to&nbsp;discuss the limits of forensic science, prosecutors’ advantages over defense during trials, and other ways the criminal justice system is falling short.&nbsp;The recording of their conversation is today's podcast episode.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bill of Rights provides a great number of protections for accused and convicted&nbsp;criminals: it promises trial by jury;&nbsp;it&nbsp;prohibits “cruel and unusual” punishment. And in this system, defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Yet few criminal indictments today&nbsp;are actually decided&nbsp;by a full trial; instead, prosecutors have many points of leverage, and&nbsp;defendants have strong incentives to plead guilty. Are these tools and incentives good for constitutional government?</p><p>Judge Jed Rakoff, of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, recently&nbsp;published a book arguing for major reforms:&nbsp;“<a href="https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374289997" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><u>Why the Innocent Plead Guilty and the Guilty Go Free: And Other Paradoxes of Our Broken Legal System</u></a><u>.</u>” On April 29, 2021, he participated in a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.aei.org/events/why-the-innocent-plead-guilty-and-the-guilty-go-free-a-book-event-with-judge-jed-s-rakoff/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><u>public web event</u></a>&nbsp;with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><u>Adam</u></a><u>,</u>&nbsp;to&nbsp;discuss the limits of forensic science, prosecutors’ advantages over defense during trials, and other ways the criminal justice system is falling short.&nbsp;The recording of their conversation is today's podcast episode.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">386d52d4-4344-4a3a-97ac-cddc756c3d53</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/94d72ae0-c83b-4e5e-b5a8-fe8ed7ed8c45/un-ep46-2021-7-8-rakoff.mp3" length="66811655" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>01:09:36</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>46</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Fears of a setting sun: Dennis C. Rasmussen on the worries of Washington, Hamilton, Adams, and Jefferson</title><itunes:title>Fears of a setting sun: Dennis C. Rasmussen on the worries of Washington, Hamilton, Adams, and Jefferson</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>From today’s vantage point, the Founding era often seems a time churning with decisive hopefulness. The 1789 Constitutional Convention certainly featured vehement debate, as Gary Schmitt and Joseph Bessette noted in our <a href="https://www.aei.org/podcast/neither-monarch-nor-magistrate-joseph-m-bessette-and-gary-j-schmitt-on-crafting-a-republican-executive/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">last episode</a>. But optimism appeared to prevail: on the last day of the Convention, Benjamin Franklin concluded that a <em>rising</em>, rather than a setting, sun was the apt metaphor for the fledgling nation. </p><p>Yet many of our most revered Founders –Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton – expressed deep concern for the new nation’s prospects for success. The framers’ worries, often overlooked in scholarship, is the subject of Syracuse University Political Science Professor <a href="https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/psc/Rasmussen,_Dennis/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Dennis Rasmussen</a>’s new book, <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691210230/fears-of-a-setting-sun" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Fears of a Setting Sun: The Disillusionment of America's Founders</em>.</a> Listen as <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> and Dennis discuss the Founders’ fears – and one framer whose measured confidence was notable exception. </p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From today’s vantage point, the Founding era often seems a time churning with decisive hopefulness. The 1789 Constitutional Convention certainly featured vehement debate, as Gary Schmitt and Joseph Bessette noted in our <a href="https://www.aei.org/podcast/neither-monarch-nor-magistrate-joseph-m-bessette-and-gary-j-schmitt-on-crafting-a-republican-executive/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">last episode</a>. But optimism appeared to prevail: on the last day of the Convention, Benjamin Franklin concluded that a <em>rising</em>, rather than a setting, sun was the apt metaphor for the fledgling nation. </p><p>Yet many of our most revered Founders –Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton – expressed deep concern for the new nation’s prospects for success. The framers’ worries, often overlooked in scholarship, is the subject of Syracuse University Political Science Professor <a href="https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/psc/Rasmussen,_Dennis/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Dennis Rasmussen</a>’s new book, <a href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691210230/fears-of-a-setting-sun" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Fears of a Setting Sun: The Disillusionment of America's Founders</em>.</a> Listen as <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> and Dennis discuss the Founders’ fears – and one framer whose measured confidence was notable exception. </p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">0f5b7de9-51ca-43f6-9fc2-1735ae19548b</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/11e93bd2-837f-4e83-8594-baca88c613a7/un-ep45-2021-06-24-rasmussen.mp3" length="56035474" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>58:22</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>45</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Neither monarch nor magistrate: Joseph M. Bessette and Gary J. Schmitt on crafting a republican executive</title><itunes:title>Neither monarch nor magistrate: Joseph M. Bessette and Gary J. Schmitt on crafting a republican executive</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>When the Constitutional Convention began in 1787, delegates were tasked with creating a government that could simultaneously avoid monarchy’s overreaches and the Articles of Confederation’s ineffectiveness. In other words, the Convention needed to craft a republican executive. The Convention’s arguments over presidential selection, structure, and scope captured both the danger and fragility of executive power – twin concerns still evident in today’s debates about the presidency.</p><p>Claremont McKenna College professor of Government <a href="https://www.cmc.edu/academic/faculty/profile/joseph-bessette" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Joseph Bessette</a> and frequent guest and AEI scholar <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/gary-j-schmitt/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Gary Schmitt</a> join <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> on <a href="https://www.aei.org/tag/unprecedential-podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Unprecedential</a> to discuss their recent AEI report, “<a href="https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Crafting-a-republican-executive.pdf?x91208" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Crafting a Republican Executive: The Presidency and the Constitutional Convention</a>.”</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Constitutional Convention began in 1787, delegates were tasked with creating a government that could simultaneously avoid monarchy’s overreaches and the Articles of Confederation’s ineffectiveness. In other words, the Convention needed to craft a republican executive. The Convention’s arguments over presidential selection, structure, and scope captured both the danger and fragility of executive power – twin concerns still evident in today’s debates about the presidency.</p><p>Claremont McKenna College professor of Government <a href="https://www.cmc.edu/academic/faculty/profile/joseph-bessette" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Joseph Bessette</a> and frequent guest and AEI scholar <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/gary-j-schmitt/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Gary Schmitt</a> join <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> on <a href="https://www.aei.org/tag/unprecedential-podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Unprecedential</a> to discuss their recent AEI report, “<a href="https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Crafting-a-republican-executive.pdf?x91208" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Crafting a Republican Executive: The Presidency and the Constitutional Convention</a>.”</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">2e9db659-bc28-44ac-8076-4870b86866ad</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/5b65757b-e802-4b9f-865a-76be568df1f8/un-ep44-2021-06-10-bessette-and-schmitt.mp3" length="58947849" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>01:01:24</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>44</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Defining women’s rights: Erika Bachiochi on the constitutional debate over women’s equality</title><itunes:title>Defining women’s rights: Erika Bachiochi on the constitutional debate over women’s equality</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Since the 19<sup>th</sup> Amendment ratified women’s right to vote in 1920, the quest for women’s equality in America has taken many turns. But the philosophical lineage behind the legal and cultural debates about women’s rights remains visible in today’s disagreements. Intellectual descendants of John Stuart Mill argue that reproductive autonomy best achieves economic equality for women. Heirs of Mary Wollstonecraft’s thought, on the other hand, emphasize the need for laws that require employers to respect men’s and women’s family obligations. </p><p>Erika Bachiochi, fellow at the <a href="https://eppc.org/author/erika_bachiochi/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Ethics and Public Policy Center</a>, senior fellow at the <a href="https://www.abigailadamsinstitute.org/senior-fellows-1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Abigail Adams Institute</a>, and author of the forthcoming book <a href="https://undpress.nd.edu/9780268200824/the-rights-of-women/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>The Rights of Women: Reclaiming a Lost Vision</em></a>, joins Adam to trace and evaluate the evolving debate over the political, legal, and cultural meaning of women’s equality.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the 19<sup>th</sup> Amendment ratified women’s right to vote in 1920, the quest for women’s equality in America has taken many turns. But the philosophical lineage behind the legal and cultural debates about women’s rights remains visible in today’s disagreements. Intellectual descendants of John Stuart Mill argue that reproductive autonomy best achieves economic equality for women. Heirs of Mary Wollstonecraft’s thought, on the other hand, emphasize the need for laws that require employers to respect men’s and women’s family obligations. </p><p>Erika Bachiochi, fellow at the <a href="https://eppc.org/author/erika_bachiochi/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Ethics and Public Policy Center</a>, senior fellow at the <a href="https://www.abigailadamsinstitute.org/senior-fellows-1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Abigail Adams Institute</a>, and author of the forthcoming book <a href="https://undpress.nd.edu/9780268200824/the-rights-of-women/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>The Rights of Women: Reclaiming a Lost Vision</em></a>, joins Adam to trace and evaluate the evolving debate over the political, legal, and cultural meaning of women’s equality.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">6c26e9e0-ca87-4e73-9a45-819712027ca2</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/cc0d0213-a597-4172-9219-7e6f066abed6/un-ep43-2021-5-27-erika-bachiochi.mp3" length="55266847" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>57:34</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>43</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>The politics of religious freedom: Helen Alvaré on worship in a secular age</title><itunes:title>The politics of religious freedom: Helen Alvaré on worship in a secular age</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Both historically and constitutionally, the freedom to worship has been a centerpiece of American politics. For much of their history, Americans viewed religious devotion as a linchpin of human experience and deserving of legal protection. But traditional religion has become increasingly suspect in the current cultural landscape, which prizes autonomy and freedom. For those with secular beliefs, faith can seem like a veil for discrimination and intolerance.</p><p>To discuss the political dynamics of religion, George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School professor <a href="https://www.law.gmu.edu/faculty/directory/fulltime/alvare_helen" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Helen Alvaré</a> joins <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> on Unprecedential. Adam and Professor Alvaré, who has written and edited three books on topics related law and religion, consider religion’s place in government, in politics, and in education.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both historically and constitutionally, the freedom to worship has been a centerpiece of American politics. For much of their history, Americans viewed religious devotion as a linchpin of human experience and deserving of legal protection. But traditional religion has become increasingly suspect in the current cultural landscape, which prizes autonomy and freedom. For those with secular beliefs, faith can seem like a veil for discrimination and intolerance.</p><p>To discuss the political dynamics of religion, George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School professor <a href="https://www.law.gmu.edu/faculty/directory/fulltime/alvare_helen" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Helen Alvaré</a> joins <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> on Unprecedential. Adam and Professor Alvaré, who has written and edited three books on topics related law and religion, consider religion’s place in government, in politics, and in education.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">1a205dea-8f9d-4de9-8726-b957cf0b9508</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/605ede71-ce83-465e-9ef3-5f335d1e51d8/un-ep42-2021-05-13-alvare.mp3" length="44707523" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>46:34</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>42</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Politics, faith, and the law: Ryan Anderson on American religion and public policy</title><itunes:title>Politics, faith, and the law: Ryan Anderson on American religion and public policy</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>The relationship between politics and religion is inevitably fraught. In the American context, various confessions have evaluated America’s political arrangement differently over time, but some themes of the debate remain the same. Does America’s constitutional character favor religious belief? Or does it imply an anthropology of autonomous individualism and tacitly encourage secularism? Should laws move beyond mere proceduralism towards soulcraft, and if so, how can they do so while respecting America’s cultural and religious diversity? In our current moment, is big tech a threat to the First Amendment’s free speech and free exercise guarantees? </p><p>Ryan Anderson, President of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and author of <a href="https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/when-harry-became-sally-responding-to-the-transgender-moment/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment</em></a> and <a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1621574512/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1621574512&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=r02ea-20&amp;linkId=19ec3cded09eb2bcb85cc3bece52d9d6" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and Religious Freedom</em></a>, joins <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> to discuss how to think about the competing priorities of religion, law, technology, and speech. Ryan’s <em>Public Discourse </em>essay, “<a href="https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2021/04/75288/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">America, Liberalism, and Catholicism</a>” and the University of Dallas’ <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8eB8uNksyg0zxEIVFJHaK4T_t4kN2Os3" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">recent JPII Conference</a> also explore the themes discussed in this episode.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The relationship between politics and religion is inevitably fraught. In the American context, various confessions have evaluated America’s political arrangement differently over time, but some themes of the debate remain the same. Does America’s constitutional character favor religious belief? Or does it imply an anthropology of autonomous individualism and tacitly encourage secularism? Should laws move beyond mere proceduralism towards soulcraft, and if so, how can they do so while respecting America’s cultural and religious diversity? In our current moment, is big tech a threat to the First Amendment’s free speech and free exercise guarantees? </p><p>Ryan Anderson, President of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and author of <a href="https://www.encounterbooks.com/books/when-harry-became-sally-responding-to-the-transgender-moment/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment</em></a> and <a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1621574512/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1621574512&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=r02ea-20&amp;linkId=19ec3cded09eb2bcb85cc3bece52d9d6" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and Religious Freedom</em></a>, joins <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> to discuss how to think about the competing priorities of religion, law, technology, and speech. Ryan’s <em>Public Discourse </em>essay, “<a href="https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2021/04/75288/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">America, Liberalism, and Catholicism</a>” and the University of Dallas’ <a href="https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8eB8uNksyg0zxEIVFJHaK4T_t4kN2Os3" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">recent JPII Conference</a> also explore the themes discussed in this episode.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">03d917f0-6978-4bc0-bea4-d00f0db226d4</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/84effffd-dd4a-4348-8040-0dc0fb5a9386/un-ep41-2021-04-29-anderson.mp3" length="68706740" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>01:11:34</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>41</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Free speech on campus: Stuart Taylor and Nicole Neily on defending dialogue in higher education</title><itunes:title>Free speech on campus: Stuart Taylor and Nicole Neily on defending dialogue in higher education</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Higher education is supposed to provide space for citizens to generate new ideas, consider old ones, and debate about society’s priorities. But these intellectual activities depend upon open channels of dialogue, which face profound challenges from politically sensitive administrators and students driven by activism. What legal protections can students and faculty with diverse views invoke when their right to free speech is flouted? How can dissidents from academia’s sanctioned opinions influence campus culture to accept and cultivate diverse ideas?</p><p>In today’s episode, <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> is joined by Stuart Taylor, longtime Supreme Court journalist and co-founder of <a href="https://princetoniansforfreespeech.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Princetonians for Free Speech</a>, and Nicole Neily, president of <a href="https://speechfirst.org/our-team/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Speech First</a> and <a href="https://defendinged.org/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Parents Defending Education</a>. They discuss how to defend open dialogue on campus–both legally and culturally.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Higher education is supposed to provide space for citizens to generate new ideas, consider old ones, and debate about society’s priorities. But these intellectual activities depend upon open channels of dialogue, which face profound challenges from politically sensitive administrators and students driven by activism. What legal protections can students and faculty with diverse views invoke when their right to free speech is flouted? How can dissidents from academia’s sanctioned opinions influence campus culture to accept and cultivate diverse ideas?</p><p>In today’s episode, <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> is joined by Stuart Taylor, longtime Supreme Court journalist and co-founder of <a href="https://princetoniansforfreespeech.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Princetonians for Free Speech</a>, and Nicole Neily, president of <a href="https://speechfirst.org/our-team/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Speech First</a> and <a href="https://defendinged.org/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Parents Defending Education</a>. They discuss how to defend open dialogue on campus–both legally and culturally.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">b7b8f434-9626-473d-b491-877ddf6991b9</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/c1c52c28-dbdd-41a3-b632-ab420f37a785/un-ep40-2021-04-15-taylor-and-reilly.mp3" length="49795359" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>51:52</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>40</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Political science: Tony Mills on expert judgement and public policy</title><itunes:title>Political science: Tony Mills on expert judgement and public policy</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>The pandemic has dramatically emphasized the authority that scientific expertise commands in our political culture. As the CDC has periodically updated its guidelines over the course of the year, states, localities, and businesses adapted their policies in light of the new findings. The mantra of covid-19 has been “follow the science,” as though some rational machine processes new data and computes updated guidelines behind the scenes.</p><p>Often overlooked is the central role that human judgment plays in scientific discovery. <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/tony-mills/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tony Mills</a>, AEI resident scholar and expert in science policy, joins <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> to discuss the ways judgment and deliberation guide scientific discovery. They also consider how to weigh scientific knowledge with other forms of expertise relevant to public policy. Tony’s recent paper, “<a href="about:blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Role of Judgment and Deliberation in Science-Based Policy</a>,” explores the themes of this episode.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pandemic has dramatically emphasized the authority that scientific expertise commands in our political culture. As the CDC has periodically updated its guidelines over the course of the year, states, localities, and businesses adapted their policies in light of the new findings. The mantra of covid-19 has been “follow the science,” as though some rational machine processes new data and computes updated guidelines behind the scenes.</p><p>Often overlooked is the central role that human judgment plays in scientific discovery. <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/tony-mills/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tony Mills</a>, AEI resident scholar and expert in science policy, joins <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> to discuss the ways judgment and deliberation guide scientific discovery. They also consider how to weigh scientific knowledge with other forms of expertise relevant to public policy. Tony’s recent paper, “<a href="about:blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Role of Judgment and Deliberation in Science-Based Policy</a>,” explores the themes of this episode.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">a1983ce8-8741-4601-8851-e6eb4467f4fd</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/a07ebb67-0da0-4d17-a644-459cfc55bb54/un-ep39-2021-04-01-tony-mills.mp3" length="52068200" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:14</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Truth will set you free: Jamie Fly on America&apos;s message abroad</title><itunes:title>Truth will set you free: Jamie Fly on America&apos;s message abroad</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>As Ivana Stradner and Gary Schmitt noted in <a href="https://www.aei.org/podcast/global-institutions-and-the-u-s-constitution-ivana-stradner-and-gary-schmitt-on-the-challenges-facing-america/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Unprecedential’s previous episode</a>, the United States maintains many political, economic, and cultural interests abroad. One of the United States’ most crucial efforts abroad is the dissemination of unflinching, factual reporting in foreign nations without a free press of their own, which is the aim of <a href="https://pressroom.rferl.org/about-us" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty</a>. By maintaining editorial independence and objective reporting, even when inconvenient to American interests, RFE/RL showcases the connection between truth and good governance. </p><p>RFE/RL’s current president and CEO <a href="https://pressroom.rferl.org/management-and-governance" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jamie Fly</a> joins <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> to discuss the organization’s Cold War history, its continuing work in today’s complex global scene, and RFE/RL’s role in American government.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Ivana Stradner and Gary Schmitt noted in <a href="https://www.aei.org/podcast/global-institutions-and-the-u-s-constitution-ivana-stradner-and-gary-schmitt-on-the-challenges-facing-america/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Unprecedential’s previous episode</a>, the United States maintains many political, economic, and cultural interests abroad. One of the United States’ most crucial efforts abroad is the dissemination of unflinching, factual reporting in foreign nations without a free press of their own, which is the aim of <a href="https://pressroom.rferl.org/about-us" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty</a>. By maintaining editorial independence and objective reporting, even when inconvenient to American interests, RFE/RL showcases the connection between truth and good governance. </p><p>RFE/RL’s current president and CEO <a href="https://pressroom.rferl.org/management-and-governance" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jamie Fly</a> joins <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> to discuss the organization’s Cold War history, its continuing work in today’s complex global scene, and RFE/RL’s role in American government.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">eb663510-dc34-4fe4-9d40-6aa917f2896a</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/c84428ac-8418-490d-84ef-63481a2b8ed3/un-ep38-2021-3-18-jamie-fly.mp3" length="41348382" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>43:04</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>38</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Global institutions and the U.S. Constitution: Ivana Stradner and Gary Schmitt on the challenges facing America</title><itunes:title>Global institutions and the U.S. Constitution: Ivana Stradner and Gary Schmitt on the challenges facing America</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>:</strong> After WWII, the United States led the world in building international institutions. But in recent decades America’s polarized politics has led to a bipolar approach to international institutions: years of significant distrust followed by years of significant deference. As the Biden Administration begins to engage international institutions, how should it approach those institutions—and recent efforts by China and Russia to influence them? And how does America’s own constitutional system and politics affect the Administration’s options?</p><p>AEI’s Jeane Kirkpatrick Fellow <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/ivana-stradner/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Ivana Stradner</a> and <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/gary-j-schmitt/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Gary Schmitt</a>, frequent Unprecedential guest and AEI Resident Scholar in Strategic Studies and American Institutions, join <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> to discuss how international law and American constitutionalism impact the United States’ role in global affairs.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>:</strong> After WWII, the United States led the world in building international institutions. But in recent decades America’s polarized politics has led to a bipolar approach to international institutions: years of significant distrust followed by years of significant deference. As the Biden Administration begins to engage international institutions, how should it approach those institutions—and recent efforts by China and Russia to influence them? And how does America’s own constitutional system and politics affect the Administration’s options?</p><p>AEI’s Jeane Kirkpatrick Fellow <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/ivana-stradner/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Ivana Stradner</a> and <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/gary-j-schmitt/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Gary Schmitt</a>, frequent Unprecedential guest and AEI Resident Scholar in Strategic Studies and American Institutions, join <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> to discuss how international law and American constitutionalism impact the United States’ role in global affairs.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">41e7c8ad-977f-4ac9-bafd-0a6a375f51e6</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:00:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/f62766bd-350c-47c2-83ca-42ef92c2467a/un-ep37-2021-3-4-ivana-stradner-and-gary-schmitt.mp3" length="33315228" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>34:42</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>37</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Congress’s first hundred days and beyond: Kevin Kosar on legislative prospects for the 117th Congress</title><itunes:title>Congress’s first hundred days and beyond: Kevin Kosar on legislative prospects for the 117th Congress</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Our national legislature is overwhelmed. With a new presidential administration comes new appointments to confirm and a fresh legislative agenda to consider. But Congress’ time and resources are scarce. Antiquated legislative procedures have created perverse partisan incentives and handicapped Congress’ ability to perform its basic functions. What challenges does the First Branch face in the months ahead, and how can Congress overcome its institutional shortcomings?&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/kevin-r-kosar/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Kevin Kosar</a>, a resident scholar at AEI and editor of the recent volume <a href="https://www.aei.org/research-products/book/congress-overwhelmed-the-decline-in-congressional-capacity-and-prospects-for-reform/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Congress Overwhelmed: The Decline in Congressional Capacity and Prospects for Reform</em></a>, talks with <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> about Congress’ role in the new government, how it can refortify itself, and ways to expand Congress’ institutional capacity and expertise.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our national legislature is overwhelmed. With a new presidential administration comes new appointments to confirm and a fresh legislative agenda to consider. But Congress’ time and resources are scarce. Antiquated legislative procedures have created perverse partisan incentives and handicapped Congress’ ability to perform its basic functions. What challenges does the First Branch face in the months ahead, and how can Congress overcome its institutional shortcomings?&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/kevin-r-kosar/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Kevin Kosar</a>, a resident scholar at AEI and editor of the recent volume <a href="https://www.aei.org/research-products/book/congress-overwhelmed-the-decline-in-congressional-capacity-and-prospects-for-reform/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Congress Overwhelmed: The Decline in Congressional Capacity and Prospects for Reform</em></a>, talks with <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> about Congress’ role in the new government, how it can refortify itself, and ways to expand Congress’ institutional capacity and expertise.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">5829b1f5-8822-477e-bd02-bc96da2aeabe</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/709e77fd-f5c3-44c0-8eca-87a0a5793470/un-ep36-2021-02-18.mp3" length="44132410" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>45:58</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>36</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>The first hundred days: Jonathan Alter on why early success matters for presidents</title><itunes:title>The first hundred days: Jonathan Alter on why early success matters for presidents</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>While presidential terms last four years, the first hundred days define much of posterity’s judgment of presidents. Franklin Roosevelt marked the one hundredth day of his term with a reflection about creating the New Deal, much of which he had assembled and executed in that short period of time. Presidents since have viewed the hundred-day window as an opportunity to establish their political prowess and push signature policies.</p><p>Jonathan Alter, acclaimed presidential biographer and political historian whose most recent book, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/His-Very-Best-Jimmy-Carter/dp/1501125486" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>His Very Best: Jimmy Carter, a Life</em></a> is the first full-length biography of Jimmy Carter, joins Adam to discuss the first hundred days tradition and consider President Biden’s goals for this period. His other books, including <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Defining-Moment-FDRs-Hundred-Triumph/dp/0743246012" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>The Defining Moment: FDR's Hundred Days and the Triumph of Hope</em></a>, have examined the significance of presidents’ early accomplishments.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While presidential terms last four years, the first hundred days define much of posterity’s judgment of presidents. Franklin Roosevelt marked the one hundredth day of his term with a reflection about creating the New Deal, much of which he had assembled and executed in that short period of time. Presidents since have viewed the hundred-day window as an opportunity to establish their political prowess and push signature policies.</p><p>Jonathan Alter, acclaimed presidential biographer and political historian whose most recent book, <a href="https://www.amazon.com/His-Very-Best-Jimmy-Carter/dp/1501125486" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>His Very Best: Jimmy Carter, a Life</em></a> is the first full-length biography of Jimmy Carter, joins Adam to discuss the first hundred days tradition and consider President Biden’s goals for this period. His other books, including <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Defining-Moment-FDRs-Hundred-Triumph/dp/0743246012" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>The Defining Moment: FDR's Hundred Days and the Triumph of Hope</em></a>, have examined the significance of presidents’ early accomplishments.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">aceb6156-a278-4ce2-9eb8-786771978125</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/cf6a919f-87cd-4488-b6d9-f98444adfe96/un-ep35-2021-02-04.mp3" length="40996465" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>42:42</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>35</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Congress and the Biden Administration: Sarah Binder and Andrew Rudalevige on legislative power</title><itunes:title>Congress and the Biden Administration: Sarah Binder and Andrew Rudalevige on legislative power</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>With President Biden’s victory and two Senate seats in Georgia turning blue, Democrats will enjoy unified government control for at least two years. However, unified government does not necessarily mean President Biden can seamlessly push his legislative agenda through Congress. House and Senate Democrats represent diverse interests and priorities that often differ from those of the White House. </p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> is joined by <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/experts/sarah-a-binder/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Sarah Binder</a>, a Brookings Institution Senior Fellow and expert in legislative politics, and <a href="https://www.bowdoin.edu/profiles/faculty/arudalev/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Andy Rudalevige</a>, Bowdoin College Professor of Government who specializes in interbranch relations and the presidency, discuss how executive and congressional powers stay separate even when unified by party. Listen as they explain consensus building amid bare Senate majorities, presidential appointments and Senate consent, and congressional oversight of the Presidency.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With President Biden’s victory and two Senate seats in Georgia turning blue, Democrats will enjoy unified government control for at least two years. However, unified government does not necessarily mean President Biden can seamlessly push his legislative agenda through Congress. House and Senate Democrats represent diverse interests and priorities that often differ from those of the White House. </p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> is joined by <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/experts/sarah-a-binder/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Sarah Binder</a>, a Brookings Institution Senior Fellow and expert in legislative politics, and <a href="https://www.bowdoin.edu/profiles/faculty/arudalev/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Andy Rudalevige</a>, Bowdoin College Professor of Government who specializes in interbranch relations and the presidency, discuss how executive and congressional powers stay separate even when unified by party. Listen as they explain consensus building amid bare Senate majorities, presidential appointments and Senate consent, and congressional oversight of the Presidency.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">c2c85457-31c0-4d58-8939-6e02e23f6c3b</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/bce4a93e-cf17-4844-9689-334e0912eac1/un-ep32-2021-1-21.mp3" length="47524588" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>49:30</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>34</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>The presidency’s first impression: Stephen Howard Browne on the inauguration of George Washington</title><itunes:title>The presidency’s first impression: Stephen Howard Browne on the inauguration of George Washington</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Aristotle defines rhetoric as the faculty for discovering the available means of persuasion in any given case. When George Washington was elected&nbsp;to be our first&nbsp;president, he used rhetoric not just in his inaugural address, but throughout the journey from his Mount Vernon home to New York's Federal Hall.&nbsp;He carefully selected his words and actions—even his clothes—to exemplify the virtues of our new Constitution and the statesmanship needed to sustain it.</p><p><a href="https://cas.la.psu.edu/people/sxb17" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Stephen Howard Browne</a>, of Pennsylvania State University describes this in a terrific new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.psupress.org/books/titles/978-0-271-08727-6.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>The First Inauguration: George Washington and the Invention of the Republic</em></a>.<em>&nbsp;</em>He joins&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a>&nbsp;on today’s episode of Unprecedential to discuss it.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aristotle defines rhetoric as the faculty for discovering the available means of persuasion in any given case. When George Washington was elected&nbsp;to be our first&nbsp;president, he used rhetoric not just in his inaugural address, but throughout the journey from his Mount Vernon home to New York's Federal Hall.&nbsp;He carefully selected his words and actions—even his clothes—to exemplify the virtues of our new Constitution and the statesmanship needed to sustain it.</p><p><a href="https://cas.la.psu.edu/people/sxb17" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Stephen Howard Browne</a>, of Pennsylvania State University describes this in a terrific new book,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.psupress.org/books/titles/978-0-271-08727-6.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>The First Inauguration: George Washington and the Invention of the Republic</em></a>.<em>&nbsp;</em>He joins&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a>&nbsp;on today’s episode of Unprecedential to discuss it.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">820d9235-2ccc-405f-a6e3-d84fba8725a1</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/f718e2d8-7912-4e44-9018-f45e6eb752ed/un-ep33-2021-01-07-browne.mp3" length="38692328" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>40:18</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>33</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>The president’s opening lines: Jeff Tulis and Gary Schmitt on the inaugural address</title><itunes:title>The president’s opening lines: Jeff Tulis and Gary Schmitt on the inaugural address</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>The president’s inaugural address exemplifies America’s republican constitution. It serves as the point of connection between the “poetry” of campaigns and the “prose” of governance. It embodies the peaceful transition of power, usually with the outgoing president present for the occasion. It comes weeks after the election’s other candidate concedes the loss, and moments after the new president swears his constitutional oath of office.</p><p>To explore the meaning of inaugural addresses in our constitutional order, University of Texas Professor of Government <a href="https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/government/faculty/tulisjk" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jeffrey Tulis</a> and AEI Resident Scholar <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/gary-j-schmitt/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Gary Schmitt</a> join <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> on today’s episode of <a href="https://www.aei.org/tag/unprecedential-podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Unprecedential</a>. Transitions, as Tevi Troy explained in the <a href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/preparing-a-presidency-tevi-troy-on-presidential-transitions/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">last episode</a>, begin to translate campaign promises into policy. By contrast, Gary and Jeff note, inaugural addresses connect the president’s oath of office to the new administration’s agenda.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The president’s inaugural address exemplifies America’s republican constitution. It serves as the point of connection between the “poetry” of campaigns and the “prose” of governance. It embodies the peaceful transition of power, usually with the outgoing president present for the occasion. It comes weeks after the election’s other candidate concedes the loss, and moments after the new president swears his constitutional oath of office.</p><p>To explore the meaning of inaugural addresses in our constitutional order, University of Texas Professor of Government <a href="https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/government/faculty/tulisjk" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jeffrey Tulis</a> and AEI Resident Scholar <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/gary-j-schmitt/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Gary Schmitt</a> join <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> on today’s episode of <a href="https://www.aei.org/tag/unprecedential-podcast/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Unprecedential</a>. Transitions, as Tevi Troy explained in the <a href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/preparing-a-presidency-tevi-troy-on-presidential-transitions/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">last episode</a>, begin to translate campaign promises into policy. By contrast, Gary and Jeff note, inaugural addresses connect the president’s oath of office to the new administration’s agenda.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">050a86f1-06bd-44f7-8f9f-7917ca69e17b</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/51ce6212-a4f0-40f2-a249-f663f529a738/un-ep32-2020-12-22-schmitt-and-tulis.mp3" length="43523459" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>45:20</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Preparing a presidency: Tevi Troy on presidential transitions</title><itunes:title>Preparing a presidency: Tevi Troy on presidential transitions</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In today’s era of modern governance, presidential transitions seems like a herculean task. The shift from a presidential campaign to a presidency requires preparing the president and his advisors for the responsibility of handling current crises; translating campaign policy proposals into actual legislation and agency actions; and identifying countless high-level officials to administer the government. How can an administration possibly be ready to govern just two and a half months after the election, on Inauguration Day?</p><p><a href="https://www.tevitroy.org/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tevi Troy</a>&nbsp;is a presidential historian with firsthand experience in the White House, administrative agencies, and presidential transitions. In this episode of Unprecedential, he joins&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a>&nbsp;to discuss the nuts and bolts of transitions. They also discuss the history of presidential transitions, with some especially famous examples. The discussion draws from Tevi’s 2013 article in National Affairs, “<a href="https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/measuring-the-drapes" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Measuring the Drapes</a>,” and his recent Washington Post op-ed, “<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/five-myths/five-myths-presidential-transitions/2020/11/13/8204d86a-2524-11eb-a688-5298ad5d580a_story.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Five myths about presidential transitions</a>.”</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today’s era of modern governance, presidential transitions seems like a herculean task. The shift from a presidential campaign to a presidency requires preparing the president and his advisors for the responsibility of handling current crises; translating campaign policy proposals into actual legislation and agency actions; and identifying countless high-level officials to administer the government. How can an administration possibly be ready to govern just two and a half months after the election, on Inauguration Day?</p><p><a href="https://www.tevitroy.org/about/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tevi Troy</a>&nbsp;is a presidential historian with firsthand experience in the White House, administrative agencies, and presidential transitions. In this episode of Unprecedential, he joins&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a>&nbsp;to discuss the nuts and bolts of transitions. They also discuss the history of presidential transitions, with some especially famous examples. The discussion draws from Tevi’s 2013 article in National Affairs, “<a href="https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/measuring-the-drapes" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Measuring the Drapes</a>,” and his recent Washington Post op-ed, “<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/five-myths/five-myths-presidential-transitions/2020/11/13/8204d86a-2524-11eb-a688-5298ad5d580a_story.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Five myths about presidential transitions</a>.”</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">044a6282-e2ee-4457-b20c-6f38c86951d3</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/19263ecc-5f33-432d-8505-4e521bdac178/un-ep31-2020-12-10-troy.mp3" length="43076225" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>44:52</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Thanksgiving for (and in) the Constitution: Yuval Levin on gratitude</title><itunes:title>Thanksgiving for (and in) the Constitution: Yuval Levin on gratitude</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>2020 has shown us that our world has a lot of room for improvement, to say the least. But there’s also a lot to be grateful for. We’ve inherited an extraordinary constitutional system that has withstood the turmoil of 2020. This system’s wise and prudent stewards – such as George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and Frederick Douglass – demonstrated remarkable gratitude for the American project, even as they sought to reform it. They recognize the “unbought grace of life,” as Edmund Burke put it. </p><p>In today’s Thanksgiving episode, <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/yuval-levin/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Yuval Levin</a>, director of AEI’s Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies department and editor of <em>National Affairs</em>, sits down with <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam </a>to discuss the role of gratitude in our political order, which was the subject of Yuval’s <a href="https://eppc.org/publications/yuval-levins-bradley-prize-remarks/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">2013 Bradley Prize remarks</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2020 has shown us that our world has a lot of room for improvement, to say the least. But there’s also a lot to be grateful for. We’ve inherited an extraordinary constitutional system that has withstood the turmoil of 2020. This system’s wise and prudent stewards – such as George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and Frederick Douglass – demonstrated remarkable gratitude for the American project, even as they sought to reform it. They recognize the “unbought grace of life,” as Edmund Burke put it. </p><p>In today’s Thanksgiving episode, <a href="https://www.aei.org/profile/yuval-levin/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Yuval Levin</a>, director of AEI’s Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies department and editor of <em>National Affairs</em>, sits down with <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam </a>to discuss the role of gratitude in our political order, which was the subject of Yuval’s <a href="https://eppc.org/publications/yuval-levins-bradley-prize-remarks/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">2013 Bradley Prize remarks</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">12f69bc0-2ae2-45d8-bc33-7cc399af8033</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 11:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/10982224-1b43-40bb-b2ea-6d683bea411f/un-ep30-2020-11-26.mp3" length="46148797" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>48:04</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Celebrity Culture and the Supreme Court: Chad Oldfather on the &quot;Inconspicuous&quot; David Souter</title><itunes:title>Celebrity Culture and the Supreme Court: Chad Oldfather on the &quot;Inconspicuous&quot; David Souter</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Since the days of John Marshall, justices have worn black robes to downplay their individuality. But in recent decades, Supreme Court justices have found themselves increasingly surrounded by a "celebrity culture" befitting politicians—or reality TV stars. If the exemplar of this trend was Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (or "RBG" to her fans), then its antithesis was Justice David Souter, who retired quietly from the Court in 2009.</p><p>Marquette University Law Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3651361" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Chad Oldfather</a>&nbsp;describes this&nbsp;in a new paper:&nbsp;“<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3651361" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Inconspicuous DHS: The Supreme Court, Celebrity Culture, and Justice David H. Souter</a>.” He discussed it with&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a>&nbsp;in today's episode—an episode first scheduled before the sad news of Justice Ginsburg's passing.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the days of John Marshall, justices have worn black robes to downplay their individuality. But in recent decades, Supreme Court justices have found themselves increasingly surrounded by a "celebrity culture" befitting politicians—or reality TV stars. If the exemplar of this trend was Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg (or "RBG" to her fans), then its antithesis was Justice David Souter, who retired quietly from the Court in 2009.</p><p>Marquette University Law Professor&nbsp;<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3651361" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Chad Oldfather</a>&nbsp;describes this&nbsp;in a new paper:&nbsp;“<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3651361" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Inconspicuous DHS: The Supreme Court, Celebrity Culture, and Justice David H. Souter</a>.” He discussed it with&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a>&nbsp;in today's episode—an episode first scheduled before the sad news of Justice Ginsburg's passing.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">7cd87fc3-8304-4db2-a280-e54d65475fe4</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/c06d4650-8ea6-419d-97fb-0b45c54a909c/un-ep-29-2020-11-12-chad-oldfather.mp3" length="40421030" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>42:06</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>The Living Presidency: Saikrishna Prakash on “recaging the executive lion”</title><itunes:title>The Living Presidency: Saikrishna Prakash on “recaging the executive lion”</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>It’s commonly noted that, in the wake of King George III’s manifold mishaps, America’s framers built a constitutional system designed to constrain the executive. After all, the Founders typically deemed Congress, not the Presidency, the most powerful branch thanks to the preeminence of legislative authority granted in the Constitution. So how is it that today’s executive branch – both the Presidency and the sprawling administrative state – commands such vast governing authority, overshadowing Congress? </p><p>University of Virginia Law Professor <a href="https://www.law.virginia.edu/faculty/profile/sp5mm/1200266" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Sai Prakash</a>, author of <a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674987982" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>The Living Presidency:</em> <em>An Originalist Argument Against Its Ever-Expanding Powers</em></a>, talks with <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> about the debates and decisions of the Founding that paved the way for the expansive executive office we see today. From early on, America’s unwritten constitution – its mores, civic culture, accumulation of practices – laid the foundation for today’s muscular presidency. To “recage the executive lion,” Sai suggests sensible reforms based on an astute originalist reading of the Constitution.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s commonly noted that, in the wake of King George III’s manifold mishaps, America’s framers built a constitutional system designed to constrain the executive. After all, the Founders typically deemed Congress, not the Presidency, the most powerful branch thanks to the preeminence of legislative authority granted in the Constitution. So how is it that today’s executive branch – both the Presidency and the sprawling administrative state – commands such vast governing authority, overshadowing Congress? </p><p>University of Virginia Law Professor <a href="https://www.law.virginia.edu/faculty/profile/sp5mm/1200266" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Sai Prakash</a>, author of <a href="https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674987982" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>The Living Presidency:</em> <em>An Originalist Argument Against Its Ever-Expanding Powers</em></a>, talks with <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> about the debates and decisions of the Founding that paved the way for the expansive executive office we see today. From early on, America’s unwritten constitution – its mores, civic culture, accumulation of practices – laid the foundation for today’s muscular presidency. To “recage the executive lion,” Sai suggests sensible reforms based on an astute originalist reading of the Constitution.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">43c47f13-edab-4834-bc47-33799e145d05</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/63e9a89f-df5d-4ea4-932a-ed06dac1e88e/un-ep28-2020-10-29-prakash.mp3" length="51140386" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>53:16</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Court of Public Opinion: Dahlia Lithwick on the press and the Supreme Court</title><itunes:title>Court of Public Opinion: Dahlia Lithwick on the press and the Supreme Court</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court reporters are tasked with the heavy responsibility of telling the Court’s story fairly and accurately. But this job is not as straightforward as it might seem. The Court decides complicated legal issues, and&nbsp;analysts must resist&nbsp;the temptation to treat the Court's work as simply political, or to suggest that the 5-4 rulings are&nbsp;the most important and representative&nbsp;ones.</p><p><a href="https://slate.com/author/dahlia-lithwick" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Dahlia Lithwick</a>&nbsp;has been writing on the Court and the law for two decades, primarily at <em>Slate</em>. In today's episode, she and Adam discuss the press's work of covering&nbsp;the Court in politically and cultural fractious times. They consider Chief Justice Roberts's sometimes surprising moves&nbsp;to minimize the Court's political footprint, and the ways in which&nbsp;justices’ authentic camaraderie creates an institutional culture of spirited but largely amiable disputes that distinguish the Court from the government's political branches. Often these themes are more complicated—and more interesting—than momentary partisan disputes.&nbsp;</p><p>*NOTE: This conversation was recorded shortly before the passing of Justice Ginsburg and the nomination of Judge Barrett to succeed her.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court reporters are tasked with the heavy responsibility of telling the Court’s story fairly and accurately. But this job is not as straightforward as it might seem. The Court decides complicated legal issues, and&nbsp;analysts must resist&nbsp;the temptation to treat the Court's work as simply political, or to suggest that the 5-4 rulings are&nbsp;the most important and representative&nbsp;ones.</p><p><a href="https://slate.com/author/dahlia-lithwick" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Dahlia Lithwick</a>&nbsp;has been writing on the Court and the law for two decades, primarily at <em>Slate</em>. In today's episode, she and Adam discuss the press's work of covering&nbsp;the Court in politically and cultural fractious times. They consider Chief Justice Roberts's sometimes surprising moves&nbsp;to minimize the Court's political footprint, and the ways in which&nbsp;justices’ authentic camaraderie creates an institutional culture of spirited but largely amiable disputes that distinguish the Court from the government's political branches. Often these themes are more complicated—and more interesting—than momentary partisan disputes.&nbsp;</p><p>*NOTE: This conversation was recorded shortly before the passing of Justice Ginsburg and the nomination of Judge Barrett to succeed her.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">4715a562-f80c-4ef6-9011-b2e59fc56575</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/6e00eab0-23e0-4251-af7d-b08bc5ec4638/un-ep27-2020-10-15-dahlia-lithwick.mp3" length="44965022" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>46:50</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>The new superpowers: Klon Kitchen on big tech and geopolitics</title><itunes:title>The new superpowers: Klon Kitchen on big tech and geopolitics</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Technology has always played a role in global affairs, encouraging trade, cooperation, and competition among nations. Today’s tech giants, however, are not just influential bystanders in the international arena. They have become peers to global political powers, sometimes going toe-to-toe with state actors. Digital technology, software engineering, and big data companies often find themselves as the gatekeepers of crucial national security information and technology. </p><p>How can the U.S. government best cooperate with tech giants to achieve national security aims and stymie adversaries like China? What strategies have state actors like the U.S., China, and Europe employed to grapple with the rise of big tech? <a href="https://twitter.com/klonkitchen?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Klon Kitchen</a> joins Adam to consider these themes and discuss his recent essay, “<a href="https://nationalaffairs.com/the-new-superpowers-how-and-why-the-tech-industry-is-shaping-the-international-system" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The New Superpowers: How and Why the Tech Industry is Shaping the International System</a>” featured in <em>National Affairs</em>’ special issue, “<a href="https://nationalaffairs.com/big-tech-big-government-challenges-regulating-internet-platforms" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Big Tech, Big Government: The Challenges of Regulating Internet Platforms</a>.” Klon is the Director for the Heritage Foundation’s Center for Technology Policy. His newsletter, the <a href="https://www9.heritage.org/Kitchen-Sync-Subscribe-Page.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Kitchen Sync</a>, offers regular updates technology and global affairs.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology has always played a role in global affairs, encouraging trade, cooperation, and competition among nations. Today’s tech giants, however, are not just influential bystanders in the international arena. They have become peers to global political powers, sometimes going toe-to-toe with state actors. Digital technology, software engineering, and big data companies often find themselves as the gatekeepers of crucial national security information and technology. </p><p>How can the U.S. government best cooperate with tech giants to achieve national security aims and stymie adversaries like China? What strategies have state actors like the U.S., China, and Europe employed to grapple with the rise of big tech? <a href="https://twitter.com/klonkitchen?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Klon Kitchen</a> joins Adam to consider these themes and discuss his recent essay, “<a href="https://nationalaffairs.com/the-new-superpowers-how-and-why-the-tech-industry-is-shaping-the-international-system" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The New Superpowers: How and Why the Tech Industry is Shaping the International System</a>” featured in <em>National Affairs</em>’ special issue, “<a href="https://nationalaffairs.com/big-tech-big-government-challenges-regulating-internet-platforms" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Big Tech, Big Government: The Challenges of Regulating Internet Platforms</a>.” Klon is the Director for the Heritage Foundation’s Center for Technology Policy. His newsletter, the <a href="https://www9.heritage.org/Kitchen-Sync-Subscribe-Page.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Kitchen Sync</a>, offers regular updates technology and global affairs.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">76adbf25-b50a-4d9c-870d-3ac97ae51e5e</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/4f9bd992-57ae-48f1-a549-8328c7584cd7/un-ep27-bonus-2020-10-13-kitchen.mp3" length="43270611" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>45:04</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>bonus</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>The Essential Scalia: Judge Jeffrey Sutton and Ed Whelan on Justice Scalia’s jurisprudence</title><itunes:title>The Essential Scalia: Judge Jeffrey Sutton and Ed Whelan on Justice Scalia’s jurisprudence</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>It is difficult to exaggerate Justice Antonin Scalia’s outsized impact on American constitutional law. Originalism and textualism, the interpretive methods he championed throughout his career, are key themes in today’s legal landscape thanks in large part to his elegant and witty defense of their merits. </p><p>In this episode of Unprecedential, two former Scalia clerks, Sixth Circuit Judge <a href="https://fedsoc.org/contributors/jeffrey-sutton" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jeffrey Sutton</a> and the Ethics and Public Policy Center’s president <a href="https://eppc.org/author/edward_whelan/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Ed Whelan</a>, join <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> to talk about the recent compilation of Scalia’s writings they edited, <a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/602308/the-essential-scalia-by-antonin-scalia-edited-by-jeffrey-s-sutton-and-edward-whelan/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>The Essential Scalia: On the Constitution, the Courts, and the Rule of Law</em></a>. </p><p>Judge Sutton and Ed note that equally significant to Justice Scalia’s legal acumen was his amiable character. They discuss with Adam their memories of his generous mentorship of them as clerks, and his affable spirit even to those with whom he dissented vehemently. Justice Scalia’s playful disposition leaps out of his writings, providing his ideas with clarity, vividness, and pleasure uncommon in the legal profession. His faithfulness to originalism, as Judge Sutton and Ed point out, brought him both critics and admirers. But such principled jurisprudence is a sparkling example to all of judging at its very finest.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is difficult to exaggerate Justice Antonin Scalia’s outsized impact on American constitutional law. Originalism and textualism, the interpretive methods he championed throughout his career, are key themes in today’s legal landscape thanks in large part to his elegant and witty defense of their merits. </p><p>In this episode of Unprecedential, two former Scalia clerks, Sixth Circuit Judge <a href="https://fedsoc.org/contributors/jeffrey-sutton" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jeffrey Sutton</a> and the Ethics and Public Policy Center’s president <a href="https://eppc.org/author/edward_whelan/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Ed Whelan</a>, join <a href="https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Adam</a> to talk about the recent compilation of Scalia’s writings they edited, <a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/602308/the-essential-scalia-by-antonin-scalia-edited-by-jeffrey-s-sutton-and-edward-whelan/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>The Essential Scalia: On the Constitution, the Courts, and the Rule of Law</em></a>. </p><p>Judge Sutton and Ed note that equally significant to Justice Scalia’s legal acumen was his amiable character. They discuss with Adam their memories of his generous mentorship of them as clerks, and his affable spirit even to those with whom he dissented vehemently. Justice Scalia’s playful disposition leaps out of his writings, providing his ideas with clarity, vividness, and pleasure uncommon in the legal profession. His faithfulness to originalism, as Judge Sutton and Ed point out, brought him both critics and admirers. But such principled jurisprudence is a sparkling example to all of judging at its very finest.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">19f49eb5-8235-4ed9-8e31-b8c47b955b5d</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/6989e468-5dc8-47ef-8e52-0c95036d5564/un-ep25-2020-10-01-essential-scalia.mp3" length="50085279" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>52:10</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Supreme Disorder: Ilya Shapiro on the politics of Supreme Court nominations</title><itunes:title>Supreme Disorder: Ilya Shapiro on the politics of Supreme Court nominations</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Americans are all too aware of the partisan warfare involved in recent nominations to the Supreme Court. Heated political frenzy accompanied Brett Kavanaugh, Merrick Garland, and Neil Gorsuch on their path to reaching (or being denied) a seat on the nation’s highest bench. How much further will the Supreme Court nomination battles escalate? How did […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/supreme-disorder-ilya-shapiro-on-the-politics-of-supreme-court-nominations/">Supreme Disorder: Ilya Shapiro on the politics of Supreme Court nominations</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans are all too aware of the partisan warfare involved in recent nominations to the Supreme Court. Heated political frenzy accompanied Brett Kavanaugh, Merrick Garland, and Neil Gorsuch on their path to reaching (or being denied) a seat on the nation’s highest bench. How much further will the Supreme Court nomination battles escalate? How did […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/supreme-disorder-ilya-shapiro-on-the-politics-of-supreme-court-nominations/">Supreme Disorder: Ilya Shapiro on the politics of Supreme Court nominations</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/supreme-disorder-ilya-shapiro-on-the-politics-of-supreme-court-nominations/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008577396</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:30:00 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/8f075410-f795-4094-a282-e3c3687d87b4/un-ep24-2020-09-10-ilya-shapiro.mp3" length="52740861" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:56</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
Americans&lt;br /&gt;
are all too aware of the partisan warfare involved in recent nominations to the&lt;br /&gt;
Supreme Court. Heated political frenzy accompanied Brett Kavanaugh, Merrick&lt;br /&gt;
Garland, and Neil Gorsuch on their path to reaching (or being denied) a seat on&lt;br /&gt;
the nation’s highest bench. How much further will the Supreme Court nomination&lt;br /&gt;
battles escalate? How did we get here? How much of today’s vitriolic atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
surrounding the nomination process is business as usual, and how much is it a&lt;br /&gt;
symptom of our polarized era?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/ishapiro?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot;&gt;Ilya Shapiro&lt;/a&gt;, author of the forthcoming book &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/Supreme-Disorder-Judicial-Nominations-Politics/dp/1684510562&quot;&gt;Supreme Disorder: Judicial Nominations and the Politics of America&amp;#8217;s Highest Court&lt;/a&gt;, joins &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt; on this episode of Unprecedential todiscuss the fascinating and sometimes unexpected history of Supreme Court nominations. This history involves idiosyncratic moments, such as men being confirmed to the Supreme Court before they even knew they were nominated in the earliest days of the republic. There are also interesting anecdotes of nominations past, including the fact that hearings for judicial nominees began only in the 1930s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This history crucially informs us that disagreement and debate have always been involved in the confirmation process. Today, however, every single political controversy of national significance reaches the Supreme Court’s docket. Ilya and Adam discuss how nomination processes of the past can inform our thinking today, and point us to reforms that can deescalate the Court’s entrenchment in controversy. One especially urgent reform suggested by history is for policy disputes to be redirected away from the Court, back to the branch where they belong: Congress. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Before and after the people vote: John Fortier on the 2020 election</title><itunes:title>Before and after the people vote: John Fortier on the 2020 election</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Every presidential election involves at least some uncertainty. But usually the uncertainty is the outcome—not the process itself. In 2020, however, with COVID-19 complicating every aspect of our lives, there is great uncertainty around how the basic processes of casting and counting votes will work. Will polling places be staffed? Will significant expansion of mail-in voting […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/before-and-after-the-people-vote-john-fortier-on-the-2020-election/">Before and after the people vote: John Fortier on the 2020 election</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every presidential election involves at least some uncertainty. But usually the uncertainty is the outcome—not the process itself. In 2020, however, with COVID-19 complicating every aspect of our lives, there is great uncertainty around how the basic processes of casting and counting votes will work. Will polling places be staffed? Will significant expansion of mail-in voting […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/before-and-after-the-people-vote-john-fortier-on-the-2020-election/">Before and after the people vote: John Fortier on the 2020 election</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/before-and-after-the-people-vote-john-fortier-on-the-2020-election/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008577386</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 19:30:01 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/7aa8c567-b8e8-40d9-976b-a2b1ec52987d/un-ep23-2020-09-03-john-fortier.mp3" length="47780719" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>49:46</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
Every presidential election involves at least some uncertainty. But usually the uncertainty is the outcome—not the process itself. In 2020, however,&amp;nbsp;with &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/2019-coronavirus-coverage/&quot;&gt;COVID-19&lt;/a&gt; complicating every aspect of our lives, there is great uncertainty around how the basic processes of casting and counting votes will work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Will polling places be staffed? Will significant expansion of mail-in voting be sustainable? Will the Electoral College be able to complete its work in accordance with constitutional and statutory deadlines?&amp;nbsp;The elections will present a&amp;nbsp;tangle of legal problems, complicating both people&amp;#8217;s exercise of their right to vote and their faith in the security and legitimacy of&amp;nbsp;electoral process itself.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To discuss these questions, &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot;&gt;Adam White&lt;/a&gt; is joined by&amp;nbsp;the Bipartisan Policy Center&amp;#8217;s &lt;a href=&quot;https://bipartisanpolicy.org/person/john-c-fortier/&quot;&gt;John Fortier&lt;/a&gt;, author of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/Absentee-Early-Voting-John-Fortier/dp/0844742473&quot;&gt;Absentee and Early Voting&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and editor of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/After-People-Vote-Electoral-College/dp/0844742023&quot;&gt;After the People Vote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/After-People-Vote-Electoral-College/dp/0844742023&quot;&gt;: &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/After-People-Vote-Electoral-College/dp/0844742023&quot;&gt;A Guide to the Electoral College&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Defender in Chief: John Yoo on President Trump and executive power</title><itunes:title>Defender in Chief: John Yoo on President Trump and executive power</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Since the election of Donald Trump, Americans have been sharply divided in their views of his presidency. Has he preserved the Founding Fathers’ vision of an energetic executive? Or has President Trump, in his quest for executive efficiency, sidestepped crucial constitutional constraints? This episode presents John Yoo and Adam White’s conversation from the July 28 […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/defender-in-chief-john-yoo-on-president-trump-and-executive-power/">Defender in Chief: John Yoo on President Trump and executive power</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the election of Donald Trump, Americans have been sharply divided in their views of his presidency. Has he preserved the Founding Fathers’ vision of an energetic executive? Or has President Trump, in his quest for executive efficiency, sidestepped crucial constitutional constraints? This episode presents John Yoo and Adam White’s conversation from the July 28 […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/defender-in-chief-john-yoo-on-president-trump-and-executive-power/">Defender in Chief: John Yoo on President Trump and executive power</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/defender-in-chief-john-yoo-on-president-trump-and-executive-power/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008576156</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:30:07 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/11020b33-8532-486f-a5cf-9a0319d3cefd/un-ep22-2020-08-20-defender-in-chief.mp3" length="54148377" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>56:24</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
Since the election of Donald Trump, Americans have been sharply divided in their views of his presidency. Has he preserved the Founding Fathers’ vision of an energetic executive? Or has President Trump, in his quest for executive efficiency, sidestepped crucial constitutional constraints? This episode presents John Yoo and Adam White’s conversation from the July 28 AEI webinar on John’s new book, Defender in Chief: Donald Trump&amp;#8217;s Fight for Presidential Power. During their conversation, John and Adam examine Donald Trump’s performance as president. But they also unearth and discuss deeper theories about the nature of executive power. John contends that president have a “power to reverse,” meaning a vastly consequential policymaking power to modify the decisions of previous administrations. John also sees a vital role for presidents, not just the Supreme Court, in defending the Constitution. In this episode, Adam and John consider and debate these ideas and others that animate American constitutionalism today. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>The Cost of Greatness: Jay Cost on the Bank of the United States</title><itunes:title>The Cost of Greatness: Jay Cost on the Bank of the United States</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>When George Washington’s Administration proposed to create a national bank, it exploded divisions among Americans—and, more specifically, among Alexander Hamilton and James Madison—about what our Constitution means. The Bank, and the arguments surrounding it, continue to echo today. To discuss the Bank of the United States, Adam was joined on the podcast by AEI’s own […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/the-cost-of-greatness-jay-cost-on-the-bank-of-the-united-states/">The Cost of Greatness: Jay Cost on the Bank of the United States</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When George Washington’s Administration proposed to create a national bank, it exploded divisions among Americans—and, more specifically, among Alexander Hamilton and James Madison—about what our Constitution means. The Bank, and the arguments surrounding it, continue to echo today. To discuss the Bank of the United States, Adam was joined on the podcast by AEI’s own […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/the-cost-of-greatness-jay-cost-on-the-bank-of-the-united-states/">The Cost of Greatness: Jay Cost on the Bank of the United States</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/the-cost-of-greatness-jay-cost-on-the-bank-of-the-united-states/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008574752</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 19:30:48 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/166bfd65-365a-47b8-8e1b-6ff3926011ec/un-ep21-2020-08-06-jay-cost.mp3" length="48452420" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>50:28</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
When George Washington’s&lt;br /&gt;
Administration proposed to create a national bank, it exploded divisions among&lt;br /&gt;
Americans—and, more specifically, among Alexander Hamilton and James&lt;br /&gt;
Madison—about what our Constitution means. The Bank, and the arguments&lt;br /&gt;
surrounding it, continue to echo today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To discuss the Bank of the United States, Adam was joined on the podcast by AEI’s own &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/JayCostTWS?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot;&gt;Jay Cost&lt;/a&gt;, who has written about Madison’s concerns that the Bank and other federal initiatives would foster corruption and oligarchy. (See especially his recent two-part AEI &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/a-powerful-machine-part-i-james-madison-the-first-bank-of-the-united-states-and-the-dangers-of-public-private-partnerships/&quot;&gt;essay&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/a-powerful-machine-part-2-lessons-from-the-death-and-rebirth-of-the-birth-of-the-united-states/&quot;&gt;series&lt;/a&gt;.) Jay and Adam discuss problems inherent in factionalism, private-public partnerships, established churches—and whether Madison would have ever admitted that Hamilton was right about the Bank. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This discussion follows previous Unprecedential episodes &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/multimedia/mcculloch-v-maryland-at-200/&quot;&gt;on McCulloch v. Maryland&lt;/a&gt; (with Gary Schmitt and Nelson Lund) and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/multimedia/precedents-and-the-search-for-constitutional-meaning/&quot;&gt;on Madison’s notion of constitutional “liquidation”&lt;/a&gt; (with Will Baude). &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Judicial legitimacy</title><itunes:title>Judicial legitimacy</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court, entrusted by the Constitution with “the judicial power,” is said to wield “neither force, nor will, but merely judgment.” To that end, the Constitution gives judges significant independence from political reprisal. Yet the institution as a whole remains part of our political system. The justices are appointed by politicians. Even the number of […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/judicial-legitimacy/">Judicial legitimacy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court, entrusted by the Constitution with “the judicial power,” is said to wield “neither force, nor will, but merely judgment.” To that end, the Constitution gives judges significant independence from political reprisal. Yet the institution as a whole remains part of our political system. The justices are appointed by politicians. Even the number of […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/judicial-legitimacy/">Judicial legitimacy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/judicial-legitimacy/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008572972</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2020 19:30:46 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/b56f6b9f-ec52-49b4-ac29-7f367375d588/un-ep20-2020-07-16-greve.mp3" length="44644399" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>46:30</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court, entrusted by the Constitution with &amp;#8220;the judicial power,&amp;#8221; is said to wield &amp;#8220;neither force, nor will, but merely judgment.&amp;#8221; To that end, the Constitution gives judges significant independence from political reprisal. Yet the institution as a whole remains part of our political system. The justices&amp;nbsp;are appointed by politicians. Even the number of justices on the Court, set merely by statute and always subject to the possibility of amendment, is preserved only by tradition and political restraint.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How, then, does the independent Court maintain its legitimacy? Can unpopular decisions from a body not democratically elected undermine its ability to maintain its proper role in American governance? &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.law.gmu.edu/faculty/directory/fulltime/greve_michael&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Michael Greve&lt;/a&gt;, author of a recent &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; href=&quot;https://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/is-the-roberts-court-legitimate&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;essay&lt;/a&gt; on judicial &amp;#8220;legitimacy&amp;#8221; and the current Roberts Court, joins &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?lang=en&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt; and Tal to work through some of these most challenging issues. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>McCulloch v Maryland at 200</title><itunes:title>McCulloch v Maryland at 200</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>For the 200th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in McCulloch v. Maryland, AEI’s Program on American Citizenship commissioned six distinguished scholars to author essays related to that decision. Gary Schmitt, the editor of the volume, provides an introduction with his essay, “John Marshall and the Politics of McCulloch v. Maryland.” Nelson Lund of […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/mcculloch-v-maryland-at-200/">McCulloch v Maryland at 200</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the 200th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in McCulloch v. Maryland, AEI’s Program on American Citizenship commissioned six distinguished scholars to author essays related to that decision. Gary Schmitt, the editor of the volume, provides an introduction with his essay, “John Marshall and the Politics of McCulloch v. Maryland.” Nelson Lund of […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/mcculloch-v-maryland-at-200/">McCulloch v Maryland at 200</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/mcculloch-v-maryland-at-200/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008571639</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 19:30:11 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/eb7776d5-995b-457e-b5fb-183e2772f32a/un-ep19-2020-07-02-lund-schmitt.mp3" length="52964309" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:10</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
For the 200th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/17us316&quot;&gt;McCulloch v. Maryland&lt;/a&gt;, AEI’s Program on American Citizenship commissioned six distinguished scholars to author &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/special-features/mcculloch-v-maryland-at-200/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;essays related to that decision&lt;/a&gt;. Gary Schmitt, the editor of the volume, provides an introduction with &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/McCulloch-Introduction-Final.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;his essay&lt;/a&gt;, “John Marshall and the Politics of McCulloch v. Maryland.” Nelson Lund of George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School offers &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Lund-Chapter-Final-McCulloch.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;his criticisms&lt;/a&gt; in “The Destructive Legacy of McCulloch v. Maryland.” And finally, Unprecedential’s own Adam White &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/White-Final-McCulloch.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;defends&lt;/a&gt; Chief Justice Marshall’s decision with “McCulloch v. Maryland&amp;nbsp;and John Marshall’s Judicial Statesmanship.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All three authors join this special episode of &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/unprecedential?lang=en&quot;&gt;Unprecedential&lt;/a&gt; to discuss their views on the landmark case that touched on so many fundamental questions of constitutional governance. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Congress’ proxy wars</title><itunes:title>Congress’ proxy wars</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Adam and Tal talk with 2 panels about the decision to allow Congress to vote by proxy, how Congress functions in crisis, and the necessity of precedent</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/congresss-proxy-wars/">Congress’ proxy wars</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam and Tal talk with 2 panels about the decision to allow Congress to vote by proxy, how Congress functions in crisis, and the necessity of precedent</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/congresss-proxy-wars/">Congress’ proxy wars</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/congresss-proxy-wars/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008569900</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:30:47 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/72a3ae0a-0e23-4cc6-a70b-6e82b5fe19bb/un-ep18-2020-06-19-cooper-alicea-stern-kosar-wallner.mp3" length="79556558" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>01:22:52</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
The House of Representatives has resolved to allow members of Congress to &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/hres965&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;vote by proxy&lt;/a&gt;. Some members of the House, led by Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.republicanleader.gov/mccarthy-statement-on-lawsuit-against-proxy-voting/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;filed a lawsuit&lt;/a&gt; challenging the constitutionality of the measure, citing the lack of historical precedent for a measure allowing representatives to vote from beyond the House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To discuss the case, and the broader question of how Congress does its constitutional work in times of crisis, we bring you a special two-part episode. Part One features &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.cooperkirk.com/lawyers/charles-j-cooper/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Chuck Cooper&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cooperkirk.com/lawyers/joel-alicea/&quot;&gt;Joel Ali&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot;c (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.cooperkirk.com/lawyers/joel-alicea/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cooperkirk.com/lawyers/joel-alicea/&quot;&gt;ea&lt;/a&gt;, two of the lead lawyers arguing against the resolution’s constitutionality. In Part Two we welcome several experts on congressional procedure and precedent: &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.rstreet.org/team/kevin-kosar/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Kevin Kosar&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.pointoforder.com/about/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Michael Stern&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rstreet.org/team/james-wallner/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot;&gt;James Wallner&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Et tu, Brutus? The Anti-Federalists as cofounders</title><itunes:title>Et tu, Brutus? The Anti-Federalists as cofounders</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Adam and Tal talk with Judge Andrew Oldham about why those who opposed the US Constitution in 1787 are founders of the nation on par with its proponents</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/et-tu-brutus-the-anti-federalists-as-co-founders/">Et tu, Brutus? The Anti-Federalists as cofounders</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam and Tal talk with Judge Andrew Oldham about why those who opposed the US Constitution in 1787 are founders of the nation on par with its proponents</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/et-tu-brutus-the-anti-federalists-as-co-founders/">Et tu, Brutus? The Anti-Federalists as cofounders</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/et-tu-brutus-the-anti-federalists-as-co-founders/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008568589</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 19:30:26 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/d2a11695-4b94-44cf-b90e-cd0d1324ed67/un-ep17-2020-06-04-judge-andrew-oldham.mp3" length="40134207" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>41:48</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
When we talk about “the Founders” of the United States, we often think of the 55 men of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, 1787. We might even think of the great defenders of the Constitution that emerged from the Convention, such as &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/events/the-life-and-legacy-of-alexander-hamilton-a-discussion-of-alexander-hamilton/&quot;&gt;Alexander Hamilton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/events/james-madison-a-life-reconsidered/&quot;&gt;James Madison&lt;/a&gt;, and John Jay. But to understand the Constitutional republic we have, we must listen not just to its supporters but its detractors – known as the Anti-Federalists – lest we run the risk of playing judge while considering only one party’s brief. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://fedsoc.org/contributors/andrew-oldham&quot;&gt;Judge Andrew Oldham&lt;/a&gt; of the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit is accustomed to giving both sides their due, and as such set out to &lt;a href=&quot;https://static1.squarespace.com/static/514e1ca0e4b04c6ad1834313/t/5d8ce1a408c622711b20fb0a/1569513893033/FINAL+-+Oldham+451-476.pdf&quot;&gt;explore&lt;/a&gt; the argument of the Anti-Federalists, in &lt;a href=&quot;https://contemporarythinkers.org/herbert-storing/&quot;&gt;essays&lt;/a&gt; collected by the late Herbert Storing in ‘The Complete Anti-Federalist’. Why were they so worried about the Executive Branch? What can they tell us about today’s administrative state? And how should their arguments inform current debates about the Constitution’s original public meaning? Judge Oldham joins Unprecedential to cover all this and more.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Links:   &amp;#8211; &lt;a href=&quot;https://static1.squarespace.com/static/514e1ca0e4b04c6ad1834313/t/5d8ce1a408c622711b20fb0a/1569513893033/FINAL+-+Oldham+451-476.pdf&quot;&gt;Judge Oldham’s article, &amp;#8220;The Anti-Federalists: Past as Prologue&amp;#8221;&lt;/a&gt;   &amp;#8211; &lt;a href=&quot;https://contemporarythinkers.org/herbert-storing/&quot;&gt;Assorted works of Herbert Storing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Precedents and the search for constitutional meaning</title><itunes:title>Precedents and the search for constitutional meaning</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In Federalist 37, James Madison conceded that even the best lawmakers cannot write perfectly clear laws. “All written laws,” whether the Constitution or in statutes, “are considered as more or less obscure and equivocal, until their meaning be liquidated and ascertained by a series of particular discussions and adjudications”. These discussions happen not just in […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/precedents-and-the-search-for-constitutional-meaning/">Precedents and the search for constitutional meaning</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Federalist 37, James Madison conceded that even the best lawmakers cannot write perfectly clear laws. “All written laws,” whether the Constitution or in statutes, “are considered as more or less obscure and equivocal, until their meaning be liquidated and ascertained by a series of particular discussions and adjudications”. These discussions happen not just in […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/precedents-and-the-search-for-constitutional-meaning/">Precedents and the search for constitutional meaning</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/precedents-and-the-search-for-constitutional-meaning/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008567264</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2020 20:00:42 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/8a427db6-76d7-461d-b51f-d7e71e3a649f/un-ep16-2020-05-21-will-baude.mp3" length="47140481" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>49:06</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
In &lt;a href=&quot;https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed37.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot;&gt;Federalist 37&lt;/a&gt;, James Madison conceded that even the best lawmakers cannot write perfectly clear laws. “All written laws,” whether the Constitution or in statutes, “are considered as more or less obscure and equivocal, until their meaning be liquidated and ascertained by a series of particular discussions and adjudications”. These discussions happen not just in courts but in the course of actual administration. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, when a law’s original meaning is not clear, its ambiguities can be resolved — “liquidated” — by the people themselves, through the settlement of precedents set by judges and statesmen alike. To discuss this underappreciated part of republican self-government, and its relation to more familiar notions of judicial stare decisis, &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt; welcomes &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/WilliamBaude?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot;&gt;William Baude&lt;/a&gt; of the University of Chicago, author of two recent articles on these subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional Resources:   &amp;#8211; &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; href=&quot;https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3517580&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Precedent and Discretion&lt;/a&gt;   &amp;#8211; &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; href=&quot;https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/constitutional-liquidation/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Constitutional Liquidation&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>After the people vote, who really decides?</title><itunes:title>After the people vote, who really decides?</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Adam talks to law professor Derek Muller about the value and challenges of the Electoral College, as well as some current challenges to it's existence</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/after-the-people-vote-who-really-decides/">After the people vote, who really decides?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam talks to law professor Derek Muller about the value and challenges of the Electoral College, as well as some current challenges to it's existence</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/after-the-people-vote-who-really-decides/">After the people vote, who really decides?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/after-the-people-vote-who-really-decides/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008566149</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 20:00:40 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/91eeb23c-91df-40e3-a718-bda353ba9328/un-ep15-2020-05-11-derek-muller.mp3" length="57444385" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>59:50</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
Today the &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/tag/electoral-college/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Electoral College&lt;/a&gt; operates mostly like an algorithm, automatically converting popular votes into electoral ones. But the Constitution originally created the Electoral College to be a fourth institution in federal government. Elected and assembled every four years, this body would deliberate and elect the next president of the United States. Nearly 30 years ago, AEI published a collection of essays on the College: &amp;#8220;&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/research-products/book/after-the-people-vote-2/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;After the People Vote&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;#8221; edited by the late Walter Berns. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For years, some activists have called for the Electoral College to be abolished and replaced with a single national popular vote, while others ask how much power the states or Congress can assert over the votes of the College’s individual members. The latter question now arrives at the Supreme Court, in a pair of cases to be argued on May 13. Those cases center on questions of the respective powers of Congress, the states, and the electors themselves. To discuss them, &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/tag/unprecedential-podcast/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Unprecedential&lt;/a&gt; welcomes &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/derektmuller?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot;&gt;Professor Derek Muller&lt;/a&gt;, an expert on the law of American democracy. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Lead yourself, govern yourself</title><itunes:title>Lead yourself, govern yourself</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>US 6th Circuit Judge Ray Kethledge and Adam discuss the benefits we can glean from this time of forced solitude, and how to lead others and govern ourselves</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/lead-yourself-govern-yourself/">Lead yourself, govern yourself</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US 6th Circuit Judge Ray Kethledge and Adam discuss the benefits we can glean from this time of forced solitude, and how to lead others and govern ourselves</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/lead-yourself-govern-yourself/">Lead yourself, govern yourself</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/lead-yourself-govern-yourself/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008565363</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 19:30:15 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/1a4606aa-1c91-4f11-b637-83eb5e86e922/un-ep14-2020-05-07-judge-kethledge.mp3" length="73390785" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>01:16:27</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
Many Americans have been thrust into a period of unprecedented solitude. That can be daunting and lonely — but solitude can also be an opportunity for working on inner strength, balance, and fortitude. It can even be a time to write your most challenging opinions for the US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That is, if you are &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Kethledge&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Judge Ray Kethledge&lt;/a&gt;, who joins the podcast to discuss the lessons of his 2017 book, &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/Lead-Yourself-First-Inspiring-Leadership/dp/1632866315&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Lead Yourself First&lt;/a&gt;. He and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt; discuss how we can learn from models of thoughtful solitude, from Helmand Province, Afghanistan, to Lake Huron, Michigan and from Lincoln to Lawrence of Arabia. They also cover, you know, judge stuff: Whether statutes are ambiguous as they seem, the real meaning of the rule of law, and whether &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Hayek&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;FA Hayek&lt;/a&gt; was right about the 9th Amendment. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>George Washington, cabinetmaker</title><itunes:title>George Washington, cabinetmaker</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Some of America’s most important precedents are the ones that were set outside of the Supreme Court. So much of the form and function of American public life reflects precedents set by the founding generation, by the first Congress and the first president. And among President Washington’s most significant precedents was his establishment of the […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/george-washington-cabinetmaker/">George Washington, cabinetmaker</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of America’s most important precedents are the ones that were set outside of the Supreme Court. So much of the form and function of American public life reflects precedents set by the founding generation, by the first Congress and the first president. And among President Washington’s most significant precedents was his establishment of the […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/george-washington-cabinetmaker/">George Washington, cabinetmaker</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/george-washington-cabinetmaker/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008565364</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2020 19:30:28 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/5cabe358-d812-4163-a260-eb99b66ee2d7/un-ep13-2020-04-30-lindsay-chervinsky.mp3" length="37318402" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>38:52</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
Some of America’s most important precedents are the ones that were set outside of the Supreme Court. So much of the form and function of American public life reflects precedents set by the founding generation, by the first Congress and the first president. And among President Washington’s most significant precedents was his establishment of the cabinet as the president’s advisory council.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://twitter.com/lmchervinsky?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Dr. Lindsay Chervinsky&lt;/a&gt; describes this in her terrific new book, “&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/Cabinet-Washington-Creation-American-Institution/dp/0674986482&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Cabinet: George Washington and the Creation of an American Institution&lt;/a&gt;.” Dr. Chervinsky, a historian at the White House Historical Association, joins &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt; to discuss how the Washington administration created the model for future administrations, how the responsibilities and powers of cabinet officials changed through American history, and how those official mediated between the branches of the federal government. Dr. Chervinsky also gives an unsurprising answer when asked which president’s cabinet was worst. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Reviewing judicial review</title><itunes:title>Reviewing judicial review</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>How should US courts exercise the "judicial power" given to them by the Constitution? Princeton's Keith Whittington discusses the concept of judicial review</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/unprecedential-reviewing-judicial-review/">Reviewing judicial review</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How should US courts exercise the "judicial power" given to them by the Constitution? Princeton's Keith Whittington discusses the concept of judicial review</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/unprecedential-reviewing-judicial-review/">Reviewing judicial review</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/unprecedential-reviewing-judicial-review/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008559901</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:00:33 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/865c558b-7bc5-498c-969d-f4e93f53c472/un-ep12-2020-04-23-keith-whittington.mp3" length="40867305" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>42:34</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiii&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Article III of the US Constitution&lt;/a&gt; vests “the judicial power” in the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts. How that power should be exercised — and when it has been exercised throughout our country’s history — are questions still fiercely debated today. May courts legitimately exercise “judicial review,” the power to say conclusively what the law is? Or is this notion actually foreign to what the framers of the Constitution had in mind for the judiciary?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://twitter.com/kewhittington?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Keith Whittington&lt;/a&gt; of Princeton University, author of “&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/Repugnant-Laws-Judicial-Congress-Constitutional/dp/0700627790&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Repugnant Laws,&lt;/a&gt;” a recent book on the surprisingly misunderstood history of judicial review, joins the show to explain what “the Judicial power” has meant to Americans from the founding to the present. He and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt; then venture far afield in legal nerdery while Tal sits in the corner and quietly grits his teeth, remembering the subpar grade Whittington gave his senior thesis. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Justice delayed</title><itunes:title>Justice delayed</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court expert (and former lawyer) Amy Howe joins to discuss the role SCOTUS will play in the upcoming election and their response to COVID-19</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/justice-delayed/">Justice delayed</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court expert (and former lawyer) Amy Howe joins to discuss the role SCOTUS will play in the upcoming election and their response to COVID-19</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/justice-delayed/">Justice delayed</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/justice-delayed/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008563200</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2020 20:00:56 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/007e71e4-b70b-4ef9-83b6-eefafedd5100/un-ep11-2020-04-16-amy-howe.mp3" length="33211610" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>35:24</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
The Supreme Court was set to have a busy spring, with a full docket of cases and a schedule packed with oral arguments. But like so many American institutions, even the Highest Court in the Land had to pause business-as-usual thanks to the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/2019-coronavirus-coverage/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot;&gt;COVID-19 pandemic&lt;/a&gt;. So what happens now? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joining us to discuss these questions, and the Court’s role in the upcoming election season, is &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Amy Howe&lt;/a&gt;, a cofounder of &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; href=&quot;https://www.scotusblog.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SCOTUSblog&lt;/a&gt; and one of the leading reporters covering the Supreme Court (and a former &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; href=&quot;https://www.oyez.org/advocates/amy_howe&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Supreme Court lawyer&lt;/a&gt; herself). She helps us try to understand how the Supreme Court and its Justices may adapt — or not — to our nearly unprecedented circumstances. Is this going to change the operations of the Court forever? That’s up for debate; you be the judge. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Repugnant Laws</title><itunes:title>Repugnant Laws</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Keith Whittington joins Adam to discuss the use of judicial power throughout American history, and the radical consequences it can hold.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/repugnant-laws/">Repugnant Laws</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith Whittington joins Adam to discuss the use of judicial power throughout American history, and the radical consequences it can hold.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/repugnant-laws/">Repugnant Laws</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/repugnant-laws/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008563628</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:00:44 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/4a30ec1a-c837-4e6a-8e87-7f12ba3f2544/un-ep10-2020-04-09-repugnant-laws.mp3" length="51405773" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:19</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
How often does the Supreme Court declare laws unconstitutional? What does this say about the Court’s place in American politics? These are timeless questions, of course, but Princeton University’s &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/kewhittington?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot;&gt;Keith Whittington&lt;/a&gt; sheds significant new light on them in his latest book. Drawing from Whittington’s comprehensive database of cases,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/Repugnant-Laws-Judicial-Congress-Constitutional/dp/0700627790&quot;&gt;Repugnant Laws: Judicial Review of Acts of Congress from the Founding to the Present&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;examines how judges have used their power throughout American history, and it upends conventional wisdom in the process.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enjoy this special episode of Unprecedential, featuring Whittington’s &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/events/repugnant-laws-a-book-event-with-keith-whittington/&quot;&gt;presentation of his book at AEI&lt;/a&gt;, his conversation with &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot;&gt;Adam White&lt;/a&gt;, and some sharp audience Q&amp;amp;A. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Defense Coordinators — How the White House Manages Disaster</title><itunes:title>Defense Coordinators — How the White House Manages Disaster</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In moments of disaster, the White House is the first to respond. AEI's Kori Schake and Ryan Streeter join Adam to discuss how that response is coordinated.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/defense-coordinators-how-the-white-house-manages-disaster/">Defense Coordinators — How the White House Manages Disaster</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In moments of disaster, the White House is the first to respond. AEI's Kori Schake and Ryan Streeter join Adam to discuss how that response is coordinated.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/defense-coordinators-how-the-white-house-manages-disaster/">Defense Coordinators — How the White House Manages Disaster</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/defense-coordinators-how-the-white-house-manages-disaster/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008563623</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:15:56 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/19b2e9d8-7920-42e8-97a5-f61ca6c2cc9b/un-ep9-2020-04-02-schake-streeter.mp3" length="40932506" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>42:38</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
When disaster strikes — a public health crisis, natural disaster, or terrorist attack — the executive branch is the first to respond. Our Constitution empowers the president to respond quickly to threats, allowing the other parts of government to get their footing. But crafting an energetic response is no easy task when it requires not just coordinating the White House’s own team, but also the rest of the executive branch.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of AEI’s research directors know this firsthand. &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://twitter.com/KoriSchake&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Kori Schake&lt;/a&gt;, AEI’s director of Foreign and Defense Policy, served on the White House’s National Security Council and in the State Department after 9/11; &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://twitter.com/streeterryan&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Ryan Streeter&lt;/a&gt;, AEI’s director of Domestic Policy, served on the White House’s Domestic Policy Council during Hurricane Katrina. They join &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot;&gt;A&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot;d (opens in a new tab)&quot;&gt;d&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot;&gt;am&lt;/a&gt; to discuss some of the near-impossible challenges of coordinating responses to disaster: How are responsibilities delegated? What kind of legal considerations come into play? How does the federal government remain cognizant of state needs during national emergencies? And much more.&lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Commander in Crisis</title><itunes:title>Commander in Crisis</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>When crisis strikes, we turn to the President for leadership. But in a world of uncertainty, which response is right? Guest Tevi Troy shares his thoughts.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/commander-in-crisis/">Commander in Crisis</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When crisis strikes, we turn to the President for leadership. But in a world of uncertainty, which response is right? Guest Tevi Troy shares his thoughts.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/commander-in-crisis/">Commander in Crisis</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/commander-in-crisis/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008563597</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:30:08 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/c0dde062-1329-4130-8272-67f691a512c7/un-ep8-2020-03-26-tevi-troy.mp3" length="40547558" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>42:14</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
When crisis engulfs the nation, how should the federal government — especially the president — respond? Of course, when crisis strikes, the best response is for everyone — government and citizens alike — to have prepared in advance. But when “unknown knowns” suddenly appear and shake our sense of normalcy, we look to the president and his administration to respond.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our guest, &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://twitter.com/TeviTroy?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Tevi Troy&lt;/a&gt;, knows this well. He has served at the highest levels of government in the White House and the US Department of Health and Human Services, and has studied the White House from a historian’s perspective — most recently in “&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/Fight-House-Rivalries-White-Truman/dp/1621578364&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Fight House&lt;/a&gt;,” his account of White House rivalries. Perhaps most relevantly, though, is “&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/Shall-Wake-President-Centuries-Management/dp/1493024647&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Shall We Wake the President?&lt;/a&gt;” (2016), his account of&amp;nbsp;presidential crisis management through American history. Seeing as he predicted the coronavirus pandemic in that 2016 book, he seemed to be the right oracle to discuss disaster management within and across the various arms of government. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Virtuous republicans</title><itunes:title>Virtuous republicans</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Adam and Tal discuss whether or not the success of our republic's constitutional structure depends on the character of its citizens and servants</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/virtuous-republicans-2/">Virtuous republicans</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam and Tal discuss whether or not the success of our republic's constitutional structure depends on the character of its citizens and servants</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/virtuous-republicans-2/">Virtuous republicans</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/virtuous-republicans-2/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008563596</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:00:02 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/1625ed26-6c84-462f-8bc3-331e83ab3d20/un-ep7-2020-03-19-republican-virtue.mp3" length="37828324" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>39:24</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
That’s “republican” with a lowercase “r” — the set of structures and characteristics that together form a free people governing themselves through representative bodies and the rule of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a special guest-less episode, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt; expands on &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/02/a-republic-if-we-can-keep-it/605887/&quot;&gt;a recent essay&lt;/a&gt; in which he argues that our republic’s constitutional structure depends upon the character of its public servants and its citizens. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adam and Tal talk about the definitions and value of civility, and how Americans can see themselves as active participants in shaping the lessons of history. Tal cites the Bible; Adam quotes Ron Burgundy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional Resources:   &amp;#8211; &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/justice-gorsuch-defends-republican-virtues/&quot;&gt;Gorsuch were the joys&lt;/a&gt;   &amp;#8211; &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/12/adam-serwer-civility/600784/&quot;&gt;Civility is overrated&lt;/a&gt;   &amp;#8211; &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/coming-constitutional-storm&quot;&gt;The coming constitutional storm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Approaching the Bench</title><itunes:title>Approaching the Bench</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Adam talks to Supreme Court advocate and former CFPB senior counsel Deepak Gupta on the administrative state, regulation, and standing before SCOTUS.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/approaching-the-bench/">Approaching the Bench</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam talks to Supreme Court advocate and former CFPB senior counsel Deepak Gupta on the administrative state, regulation, and standing before SCOTUS.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/approaching-the-bench/">Approaching the Bench</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/approaching-the-bench/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008563594</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:00:57 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/7353c896-a816-40f1-a2e0-e3e45750e6a8/un-ep5-2020-03-05-gupta.mp3" length="47122823" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>44:03</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
Only a few select lawyers get to argue before the Supreme Court. But even fewer are personally appointed by a Supreme Court Justice to do so. &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;http://guptawessler.com/people/deepak-gupta/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Deepak Gupta&lt;/a&gt; is one such attorney, and is no stranger to unusual or uncharted territory. Before launching his own firm in 2012, Deepak helped start the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as senior counsel for litigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After discussing life as a Supreme Court advocate, &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt; and Deepak descend into wonkery about regulation, the administrative state, and whether various agency structures might be considered constitutional. Sure, Adam once tried to sue the CFPB into oblivion — but what’s a little constitutional litigation among friends? &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>The Constitution as an Institution</title><itunes:title>The Constitution as an Institution</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Adam White and guest Yuval Levin broaden our view of what institutions (like the Constitution) are, how they work, and how vital they are to republican citizenship.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/the-constitution-as-an-institution/">The Constitution as an Institution</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam White and guest Yuval Levin broaden our view of what institutions (like the Constitution) are, how they work, and how vital they are to republican citizenship.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/the-constitution-as-an-institution/">The Constitution as an Institution</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/the-constitution-as-an-institution/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008563592</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:00:34 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/e43df31b-cf63-48cf-9a29-dcc230b32cd0/un-ep4-2020-02-20-levin.mp3" length="44619819" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>41:23</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
What is an institution? How can we learn to see institutions more clearly in our daily lives? &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/yuval-levin/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Yuval Levin&lt;/a&gt;, director of AEI’s Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies department, editor of &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.nationalaffairs.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;National Affairs&lt;/a&gt;, and author of the new book &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/a-time-to-build-yuval-levin/1131919210;jsessionid=EB5CC48285E9385259608BB12B766DBC.prodny_store01-atgap11?ean=9781541699281&amp;amp;st=AFF&amp;amp;2sid=Hachette%20Book%20Group_8040641_NA&amp;amp;sourceId=AFFHachette%20Book%20Group#/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot;&gt;“A Time to Build”&lt;/a&gt; on restoring American institutions, joins the show to discuss the structures of American associational life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt; asks him about the challenge of upholding existing institutions and how American citizens should think of themselves as parties to the institution that is the Constitution. Meanwhile, Yuval’s ability to speak in full paragraphs amazes and delights the audience. &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Abdication and Nondelegation</title><itunes:title>Abdication and Nondelegation</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>For nearly 100 years the Supreme Court has declined to strike down laws that it believes “delegates” Congress’s legislative power to the Executive Branch. What would a more assertive “nondelegation doctrine” look like? Until then, what limits — if any — does the current nondelegation doctrine place upon Congress?   Administrative Law nerds everywhere celebrate […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/abdication-and-nondelegation/">Abdication and Nondelegation</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For nearly 100 years the Supreme Court has declined to strike down laws that it believes “delegates” Congress’s legislative power to the Executive Branch. What would a more assertive “nondelegation doctrine” look like? Until then, what limits — if any — does the current nondelegation doctrine place upon Congress?   Administrative Law nerds everywhere celebrate […]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/abdication-and-nondelegation/">Abdication and Nondelegation</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/abdication-and-nondelegation/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008563595</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:00:28 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/ddfed3fc-c9c1-454f-94e5-1d3dae81fcd6/un-ep6-2020-03-12-alan-morrison.mp3" length="49392965" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>48:44</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
For nearly 100 years the Supreme Court has declined to strike down laws that it believes &amp;#8220;delegates&amp;#8221; Congress’s legislative power to the Executive Branch. What would a more assertive “&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/special-features/the-american-enterprise-institute-project-on-the-nondelegation-doctrine/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;nondelegation doctrine&lt;/a&gt;” look like? Until then, what limits — if any — does the current nondelegation doctrine place upon Congress? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Administrative Law nerds everywhere celebrate as we welcome an indefatigable champion of the nondelegation doctrine, George Washington University Law Professor &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.law.gwu.edu/alan-b-morrison&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Alan Morrison&lt;/a&gt;. Together, he and &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/adamjwhitedc?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt; discuss separation of powers, the judiciary&amp;#8217;s role in enforcing that separation, and the timeless problem of vague laws.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Court-ing power?</title><itunes:title>Court-ing power?</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Host Adam White is joined by AEI colleage Greg Weiner to discuss the role of the Court both within and in interpreting the Constitution</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/court-ing-power/">Court-ing power?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Host Adam White is joined by AEI colleage Greg Weiner to discuss the role of the Court both within and in interpreting the Constitution</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/court-ing-power/">Court-ing power?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/court-ing-power/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008563591</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 22:31:17 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/dfe0fb74-4943-4104-8569-c7433913edc0/un-ep3-2019-11-25-greg-weiner.mp3" length="31430319" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>30:45</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
How strong is the &amp;#8220;least dangerous branch?&amp;#8221; Moreover, how self-restrained should it be? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this episode of “Unprecedential,” &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Adam White&lt;/a&gt; interviews &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/gregory-s-weiner/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Greg Weiner&lt;/a&gt;,  AEI visiting scholar and associate professor at Assumption College. Professor Weiner’s latest book, “&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/Political-Constitution-against-Judicial-Supremacy/dp/0700628371&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot;&gt;The Political Constitution: The Case Against Judicial Supremacy&lt;/a&gt;,” argues that an over-active judiciary undermines the Constitution’s republican qualities. He and Adam discuss judicial restraint, judicial legitimacy, and the Madisonian and Burkean themes of Weiner’s previous books.&lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>The ‘soul’ of the presidency</title><itunes:title>The ‘soul’ of the presidency</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>What is the essence of the American presidency? How does it compare to what the Constitution intended it to be? Adam White and guest Stephen Knott discuss.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/the-soul-of-the-presidency/">The ‘soul’ of the presidency</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the essence of the American presidency? How does it compare to what the Constitution intended it to be? Adam White and guest Stephen Knott discuss.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/the-soul-of-the-presidency/">The ‘soul’ of the presidency</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/the-soul-of-the-presidency/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008563502</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:07:01 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/e36a4386-764b-49bf-b332-ab51f9e5385e/un-ep2-2019-12-04-stephen-knott.mp3" length="38572555" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>37:02</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
What is the constitutional presidency, and what does it demand of a president? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://usnwc.edu/Faculty-and-Departments/Directory/Stephen-F-Knott&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Stephen Knott&lt;/a&gt;, a professor at the US Naval War College, explores these themes in a new book: “&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/Lost-Soul-American-Presidency-Demagoguery/dp/0700628509&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Lost Soul of the American Presidency&lt;/a&gt;.” In this episode of “Unprecedential,” &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Adam White&lt;/a&gt; asks him how we should understand the presidency in theory and in practice. Not every president can be a George Washington, but how close do we need them to come? &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>The first episode, the first branch</title><itunes:title>The first episode, the first branch</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Host and AEI Scholar Adam White talks with Cornell law professor Josh Chafetz about Congress: its limits, its powers, and its purpose</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/the-first-episode-the-first-branch/">The first episode, the first branch</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Host and AEI Scholar Adam White talks with Cornell law professor Josh Chafetz about Congress: its limits, its powers, and its purpose</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/the-first-episode-the-first-branch/">The first episode, the first branch</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/the-first-episode-the-first-branch/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008563501</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:59:31 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/8f7fce20-b430-4226-ba4f-44afd592be3e/un-ep1-2019-11-26-josh-chafetz-edits.mp3" length="20533775" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>34:13</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
Where else would we start other than with the “first branch,” Congress?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Host &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Adam White&lt;/a&gt; interviews &lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://twitter.com/joshchafetz?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Josh Chafetz&lt;/a&gt;, a professor of law at Cornell University and author of “&lt;a rel=&quot;noreferrer noopener&quot; aria-label=&quot; (opens in a new tab)&quot; href=&quot;https://www.amazon.com/Congresss-Constitution-Legislative-Authority-Separation-dp-0300248334/dp/0300248334/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Congress’s Constitution: Legislative Authority and the Separation of Powers&lt;/a&gt;&amp;#8220;. They discuss Congress’ powers, especially its “power of the purse” and its efforts to conduct “oversight” of the executive branch. Taped during the House’s impeachment hearings, we dive into a core constitutional question: What can Congress do, and how? &lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item><item><title>Welcome to Unprecedential!</title><itunes:title>Welcome to Unprecedential!</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Join host Adam White, producer Tal Fortgang, and guests as they examine the constitutional debates surrounding Congress, the President, and, of course, the courts.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/welcome-to-unprecedential/">Welcome to Unprecedential!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Join host Adam White, producer Tal Fortgang, and guests as they examine the constitutional debates surrounding Congress, the President, and, of course, the courts.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org/multimedia/welcome-to-unprecedential/">Welcome to Unprecedential!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.aei.org">American Enterprise Institute - AEI</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.aei.org/multimedia/welcome-to-unprecedential/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.aei.org/?post_type=multimedia&amp;p=1008563500</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8f1d1825-ba13-487f-a207-e1cd9ec6d8bb/unprecedential-final3000px.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[American Enterprise Institute]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:43:44 -0500</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/e490ded6-ea1d-4102-a62c-addbb522c55c/un-ep0-2019-11-06-trailer.mp3" length="11082269" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>11:33</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:summary>&lt;br /&gt;
Welcome to Unprecedential, a new AEI podcast exploring American constitutionalism beyond the courts. Join host &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aei.org/profile/adam-j-white/&quot;&gt;Adam White&lt;/a&gt;, producer Tal Fortgang, and guests as they examine the constitutional debates surrounding Congress, the President, and, of course, the courts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Benjamin Franklin once (allegedly) said that the Founders gave us “a republic—if you can keep it”. On this podcast, we’ll discuss what it takes for the American people to do so.&lt;br /&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:author>American Enterprise Institute</itunes:author></item></channel></rss>