<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://feeds.captivate.fm/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"><channel><atom:link href="https://feeds.captivate.fm/eod/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><title><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></title><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2021 22:00:04 +0000</lastBuildDate><generator>Captivate.fm</generator><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><copyright><![CDATA[Copyright 2021 Evidence of Design]]></copyright><managingEditor>radioeod@gmail.com (Evidence of Design)</managingEditor><itunes:summary><![CDATA[Evidence of Design is a live call-in talk show about the political economy, namely the the relationship between our political choices and economic outcomes. This show investigates and critiques the political-economic ideology of neoliberalism, or the belief that a free-market, small government, privatization, and financialization are the best ways to run society. Generally lacking in public discourse is appropriate attention given to vastly unequal distributions of income and wealth. This show attempts to bring the inequalities produced by neoliberalism to the forefront. Join us in deliberation as we attempt to create the vocabulary necessary to understand how our world works, and as we endeavor to become active agents of change for a more just and equitable society.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><itunes:owner><itunes:name>Evidence of Design</itunes:name><itunes:email>radioeod@gmail.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author><description>Evidence of Design is a live call-in talk show about the political economy, namely the the relationship between our political choices and economic outcomes. This show investigates and critiques the political-economic ideology of neoliberalism, or the belief that a free-market, small government, privatization, and financialization are the best ways to run society. Generally lacking in public discourse is appropriate attention given to vastly unequal distributions of income and wealth. This show attempts to bring the inequalities produced by neoliberalism to the forefront. Join us in deliberation as we attempt to create the vocabulary necessary to understand how our world works, and as we endeavor to become active agents of change for a more just and equitable society.</description><link>https://eod.captivate.fm</link><atom:link href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" rel="hub"/><itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Investigate the causes and critique the effects of economic inequality.]]></itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><itunes:category text="News"><itunes:category text="Politics"/></itunes:category><itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"></itunes:category><itunes:category text="Education"></itunes:category><item><title>Episode 154: School Bus Driver Shortage and the RCSD</title><itunes:title>Episode 154: School Bus Driver Shortage and the RCSD</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss the Rochester City School District&apos;s 9/3/2021 announcement that high school students may start the school year virtually because a bus driver shortage is causing school transportation jobs to go unfilled. The RCSD is not the only school district facing a bus driver shortage: district&apos;s across the country are short bus drivers, causing transportation disruptions to the start of the new school year.
We explore what&apos;s possibly causing the bus driver shortage, critique the standard of the 40 hour work week, and urge for the RCSD&apos;s systemic problems, such as poverty and segregation, to be resolved.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss the Rochester City School District's 9/3/2021 announcement that high school students may start the school year virtually because a bus driver shortage is causing school transportation jobs to go unfilled. The RCSD is not the only school district facing a bus driver shortage: district's across the country are short bus drivers, causing transportation disruptions to the start of the new school year.</p><p>We explore what's possibly causing the bus driver shortage, critique the standard of the 40 hour work week, and urge for the RCSD's systemic problems, such as poverty and segregation, to be resolved.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-154-school-bus-driver-shortage-and-the-rcsd]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">8265b338-556f-47e0-84a6-ffcc9d94c9c8</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2021 18:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/72c6bd7c-878d-4fe8-b344-796e9daf03a4/episode-154.mp3" length="75503194" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:53</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>154</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss the Rochester City School District&apos;s 9/3/2021 announcement that high school students may start the school year virtually because a bus driver shortage is causing school transportation jobs to go unfilled. The RCSD is not the only school district facing a bus driver shortage: district&apos;s across the country are short bus drivers, causing transportation disruptions to the start of the new school year.
We explore what&apos;s possibly causing the bus driver shortage, critique the standard of the 40 hour work week, and urge for the RCSD&apos;s systemic problems, such as poverty and segregation, to be resolved.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 152: Afghanistan - From Then to Now</title><itunes:title>Episode 152: Afghanistan - From Then to Now</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Taliban re-takeover.
The costs from United States&apos; 20 year war are steep: 250,000 lives (83x those that died 9/11) and over $2.2 trillion ($11,000,000 an hour over the past 20 years) of debt-financed spending.
We revisit clips from the Bush Administration in 2001 and hear their demands of the Taliban and projections for how the war would go. 
From a conventional war, to counterinsurgency, to nation building, to training security forces, to withdrawal and, now, to armed oversight of evacuation, U.S. involvement has been varied and challenged.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Taliban re-takeover.</p><p>The costs from United States' 20 year war are steep: 250,000 lives (83x those that died 9/11) and over $2.2 trillion ($11,000,000 an hour over the past 20 years) of debt-financed spending.</p><p>We revisit clips from the Bush Administration in 2001 and hear their demands of the Taliban and projections for how the war would go. </p><p>From a conventional war, to counterinsurgency, to nation building, to training security forces, to withdrawal and, now, to armed oversight of evacuation, U.S. involvement has been varied and challenged.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-152-afghanistan-from-then-to-now]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">64210ccc-78ad-4568-9cd3-2aed8fd00515</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 10:15:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/db33cbd2-4e63-459f-807a-3e542b8101c7/episode-152.mp3" length="61571091" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:19</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>152</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Taliban re-takeover.
The costs from United States&apos; 20 year war are steep: 250,000 lives (83x those that died 9/11) and over $2.2 trillion ($11,000,000 an hour over the past 20 years) of debt-financed spending.
We revisit clips from the Bush Administration in 2001 and hear their demands of the Taliban and projections for how the war would go. 
From a conventional war, to counterinsurgency, to nation building, to training security forces, to withdrawal and, now, to armed oversight of evacuation, U.S. involvement has been varied and challenged.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 151: Rochester Community Power with Representatives from Roctricity</title><itunes:title>Episode 151: Rochester Community Power with Representatives from Roctricity</itunes:title><description>We chat with folks from Roctricity to help us understand Rochester&apos;s new Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) power program--Rochester Community Power. Beginning in September, most Rochester residents will be automatically enrolled in Rochester Community Power which aims to deliver 100% renewable NYS-generated electricity at a fixed rate of 0.058 $/kWh for the next two years.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We chat with folks from Roctricity to help us understand Rochester's new Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) power program--Rochester Community Power. Beginning in September, most Rochester residents will be automatically enrolled in Rochester Community Power which aims to deliver 100% renewable NYS-generated electricity at a fixed rate of 0.058 $/kWh for the next two years.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-151-rochester-community-power-with-representatives-from-roctricity]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">704856b1-0fec-4026-bb96-e178579050a3</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 18:15:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/7efb93f6-cb2e-4421-a8f7-4bbca856d5c1/episode-151.mp3" length="69598861" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>52:27</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>151</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We chat with folks from Roctricity to help us understand Rochester&apos;s new Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) power program--Rochester Community Power. Beginning in September, most Rochester residents will be automatically enrolled in Rochester Community Power which aims to deliver 100% renewable NYS-generated electricity at a fixed rate of 0.058 $/kWh for the next two years.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 150: &quot;Right to Repair&quot; with Kevin O&apos;Reilly of the U.S. PIRG</title><itunes:title>Episode 150: &quot;Right to Repair&quot; with Kevin O&apos;Reilly of the U.S. PIRG</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss the &quot;Right to Repair&quot; movement with Kevin O&apos;Reilly (@kevin_oreilly7), director of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group&apos;s Right to Repair campaign.
Recently, the Biden Administration and 27 state governments have pushed legislation to make it easier and more affordable for consumers to repair consumer electronics, medical equipment, farming equipment, and more. Why? Well, for years consumer advocates have pushed for &quot;Right to Repair&quot; legislation to ensure consumers can repair devices without having to (1) throw them out and buy a new one when an issue arises or (2) be forced to pay heavy costs getting it repaired through the Original Equipment Manufacturer.
Right to Repair legislation would enable consumers and third party repair businesses (similar to third party car mechanics) to obtain the parts necessary to repair devices, the knowledge of how to repair devices, and greater choice of who to go to in order to repair a device. This could have extensive economic benefits for consumers and environmental benefits for us all.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss the "Right to Repair" movement with Kevin O'Reilly (@kevin_oreilly7), director of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group's Right to Repair campaign.</p><p>Recently, the Biden Administration and 27 state governments have pushed legislation to make it easier and more affordable for consumers to repair consumer electronics, medical equipment, farming equipment, and more. Why? Well, for years consumer advocates have pushed for "Right to Repair" legislation to ensure consumers can repair devices without having to (1) throw them out and buy a new one when an issue arises or (2) be forced to pay heavy costs getting it repaired through the Original Equipment Manufacturer.</p><p>Right to Repair legislation would enable consumers and third party repair businesses (similar to third party car mechanics) to obtain the parts necessary to repair devices, the knowledge of how to repair devices, and greater choice of who to go to in order to repair a device. This could have extensive economic benefits for consumers and environmental benefits for us all.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-150-right-to-repair-with-kevin-oreilly-of-the-u-s-pirg]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">f7cfdef7-e65c-41ca-808f-524da6cbb287</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2021 11:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/40265fbd-a15e-47d9-9d49-ad7a81024d1c/episode-150.mp3" length="64066004" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>56:07</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>150</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss the &quot;Right to Repair&quot; movement with Kevin O&apos;Reilly (@kevin_oreilly7), director of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group&apos;s Right to Repair campaign.
Recently, the Biden Administration and 27 state governments have pushed legislation to make it easier and more affordable for consumers to repair consumer electronics, medical equipment, farming equipment, and more. Why? Well, for years consumer advocates have pushed for &quot;Right to Repair&quot; legislation to ensure consumers can repair devices without having to (1) throw them out and buy a new one when an issue arises or (2) be forced to pay heavy costs getting it repaired through the Original Equipment Manufacturer.
Right to Repair legislation would enable consumers and third party repair businesses (similar to third party car mechanics) to obtain the parts necessary to repair devices, the knowledge of how to repair devices, and greater choice of who to go to in order to repair a device. This could have extensive economic benefits for consumers and environmental benefits for us all.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 149: Expanded Child Tax Credit Disbursements and Democrats&apos; Proposed Budget</title><itunes:title>Episode 149: Expanded Child Tax Credit Disbursements and Democrats&apos; Proposed Budget</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss the first disbursements of the expanded child tax credit, break down myths about why a social safety net is bad, and discuss what&apos;s in the Democrats&apos; proposed $3.5 trillion budget.
The expanded child tax credit, passed earlier this year in the American Rescue Plan with zero Republicans voting in favor of it, is a big deal. The vast majority of American families with children will now receive $3,600 for each child between the ages of 0-6 and $3,000 per child between the ages of 7-17. This is far higher than what the tax credit was before the ARP. As important, the credit is now fully refundable, meaning even the lowest income families will receive it. What&apos;s more, half of the tax credit is being disbursed as monthly installments through the end of the year, akin to universal basic income for families with children. Government programs can be incredibly helpful to enable people to live their lives more comfortably.
Speaking of which, we also break down myths about the social safety net. Believe it or not Senator Rubio, poverty is solvable by increasing income.
Lastly, we discuss what&apos;s in the Democrats&apos; proposed $3.5 trillion budget, among which is a proposal to make the aforementioned expanded child tax credits permanent.
Thanks for joining us. 
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss the first disbursements of the expanded child tax credit, break down myths about why a social safety net is bad, and discuss what's in the Democrats' proposed $3.5 trillion budget.</p><p>The expanded child tax credit, passed earlier this year in the American Rescue Plan with zero Republicans voting in favor of it, is a big deal. The vast majority of American families with children will now receive $3,600 for each child between the ages of 0-6 and $3,000 per child between the ages of 7-17. This is far higher than what the tax credit was before the ARP. As important, the credit is now fully refundable, meaning even the lowest income families will receive it. What's more, half of the tax credit is being disbursed as monthly installments through the end of the year, akin to universal basic income for families with children. Government programs can be incredibly helpful to enable people to live their lives more comfortably.</p><p>Speaking of which, we also break down myths about the social safety net. Believe it or not Senator Rubio, poverty is solvable by increasing income.</p><p>Lastly, we discuss what's in the Democrats' proposed $3.5 trillion budget, among which is a proposal to make the aforementioned expanded child tax credits permanent.</p><p>Thanks for joining us. </p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-149-expanded-child-tax-credit-disbursements-and-democrats-proposed-budget]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">ec5222b9-6373-49b3-acf0-2b126aa7b381</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2021 11:15:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/715004d9-7b7a-4ef1-bf8f-86fb3e357e0e/episode-149.mp3" length="62916545" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>52:17</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>149</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss the first disbursements of the expanded child tax credit, break down myths about why a social safety net is bad, and discuss what&apos;s in the Democrats&apos; proposed $3.5 trillion budget.
The expanded child tax credit, passed earlier this year in the American Rescue Plan with zero Republicans voting in favor of it, is a big deal. The vast majority of American families with children will now receive $3,600 for each child between the ages of 0-6 and $3,000 per child between the ages of 7-17. This is far higher than what the tax credit was before the ARP. As important, the credit is now fully refundable, meaning even the lowest income families will receive it. What&apos;s more, half of the tax credit is being disbursed as monthly installments through the end of the year, akin to universal basic income for families with children. Government programs can be incredibly helpful to enable people to live their lives more comfortably.
Speaking of which, we also break down myths about the social safety net. Believe it or not Senator Rubio, poverty is solvable by increasing income.
Lastly, we discuss what&apos;s in the Democrats&apos; proposed $3.5 trillion budget, among which is a proposal to make the aforementioned expanded child tax credits permanent.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 147: Cultural Analysis of &quot;Battle Royale&quot; Genre</title><itunes:title>Episode 147: Cultural Analysis of &quot;Battle Royale&quot; Genre</itunes:title><description>We analyze the battle royale genre (e.g. movies, games, books) and what it says about our culture.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We analyze the battle royale genre (e.g. movies, games, books) and what it says about our culture.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-147-cultural-analysis-of-battle-royale-genre]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">4900ed7f-f3d5-4fad-b641-1b692cf65e40</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2021 14:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/f31a18b1-2e1b-4223-a58d-57eee47c3808/episode-147.mp3" length="67108201" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:52</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>147</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We analyze the battle royale genre (e.g. movies, games, books) and what it says about our culture.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 146: 2021 Primary Election Results and RPD Federal Support for Crime Reduction</title><itunes:title>Episode 146: 2021 Primary Election Results and RPD Federal Support for Crime Reduction</itunes:title><description>Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-146-2021-primary-election-results-and-rpd-federal-support-for-crime-reduction]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">290923ab-f895-4af3-9952-1cdd1217aa70</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2021 13:45:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/966d3c15-5d74-43b1-a6f3-6b8b79eba1cd/episode-146.mp3" length="102083376" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:01</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>146</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 148: Proposed Global Minimum Corporate Tax</title><itunes:title>Episode 148: Proposed Global Minimum Corporate Tax</itunes:title><description>We discuss the proposed creation of a global minimum corporate tax.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discuss the proposed creation of a global minimum corporate tax.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-148-proposed-global-minimum-corporate-tax]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">e3e7f819-7bb5-4817-ba2a-f78682d48d63</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2021 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/2b2962f1-4c06-42b8-ae87-336d1d960acd/episode-148.mp3" length="73302236" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:15</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>148</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We discuss the proposed creation of a global minimum corporate tax.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 145: ProPublica Report (re)Reveals How Wealthy Avoid Paying Fair Share of Taxes</title><itunes:title>Episode 145: ProPublica Report (re)Reveals How Wealthy Avoid Paying Fair Share of Taxes</itunes:title><description>We discuss recent https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-how-the-wealthiest-avoid-income-tax (reporting) by ProPublica that (re)reveals how the wealthy avoid paying their fair share of taxes. We say (re)reveals because this should come as a surprise to no one given a preponderance of similar evidence. All the same, the reporting helps shine an even brighter light.
While the wealthiest Americans nominally pay a &quot;high&quot; dollar value in taxes, their true tax rate is fractions of what it is paid by most Americans. Using tax loopholes and tax avoidance strategies essentially only available for the wealthiest, they abscond from paying their fair share of taxes, taxes which would benefit everyone in society through public service spending.
Meanwhile, Congressional Republicans flash their true anti-majoritarian colors by obstinately blocking any efforts to rectify this oligarchical inequality, such as refusing Biden&apos;s efforts to raise the top marginal tax rate from 37% to 39.6% (which wouldn&apos;t even really affect the wealthy given the strategies they use to avoid paying taxes as shown in the ProPublica report) and refusing to adequately fund the IRS.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discuss recent <a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-how-the-wealthiest-avoid-income-tax" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">reporting</a> by ProPublica that (re)reveals how the wealthy avoid paying their fair share of taxes. We say (re)reveals because this should come as a surprise to no one given a preponderance of similar evidence. All the same, the reporting helps shine an even brighter light.</p><p>While the wealthiest Americans nominally pay a "high" dollar value in taxes, their true tax rate is <em>fractions</em> of what it is paid by most Americans. Using tax loopholes and tax avoidance strategies essentially only available for the wealthiest, they abscond from paying their fair share of taxes, taxes which would benefit everyone in society through public service spending.</p><p>Meanwhile, Congressional Republicans flash their true anti-majoritarian colors by obstinately blocking any efforts to rectify this oligarchical inequality, such as refusing Biden's efforts to raise the top marginal tax rate from 37% to 39.6% (which wouldn't even really affect the wealthy given the strategies they use to avoid paying taxes as shown in the ProPublica report) and refusing to adequately fund the IRS.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-145-propublica-report-rereveals-how-wealthy-avoid-paying-fair-share-of-taxes]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">feee2b41-eb01-4502-a646-045b34ae1b1f</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/4cf8b769-f321-4404-8e21-a014b5065b8d/episode-145.mp3" length="67237215" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>56:31</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>145</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We discuss recent https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-how-the-wealthiest-avoid-income-tax (reporting) by ProPublica that (re)reveals how the wealthy avoid paying their fair share of taxes. We say (re)reveals because this should come as a surprise to no one given a preponderance of similar evidence. All the same, the reporting helps shine an even brighter light.
While the wealthiest Americans nominally pay a &quot;high&quot; dollar value in taxes, their true tax rate is fractions of what it is paid by most Americans. Using tax loopholes and tax avoidance strategies essentially only available for the wealthiest, they abscond from paying their fair share of taxes, taxes which would benefit everyone in society through public service spending.
Meanwhile, Congressional Republicans flash their true anti-majoritarian colors by obstinately blocking any efforts to rectify this oligarchical inequality, such as refusing Biden&apos;s efforts to raise the top marginal tax rate from 37% to 39.6% (which wouldn&apos;t even really affect the wealthy given the strategies they use to avoid paying taxes as shown in the ProPublica report) and refusing to adequately fund the IRS.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 144: Three Civic Opportunities in Rochester - Food Policy Council, ARP Funding, and Primary Elections</title><itunes:title>Episode 144: Three Civic Opportunities in Rochester - Food Policy Council, ARP Funding, and Primary Elections</itunes:title><description>We discuss three important civic opportunities in Rochester, NY.
1.) Joining the recently created Rochester Food Policy Council
2.) Sharing your feedback with the City and RCSD about how American Rescue Plan Funding should be spent
3.) Preparing to vote in the June 22nd primaries
We also review the book &quot;Fulfillment: Winning and Losing in One Click America&quot; by Alec MacGillis.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discuss three important civic opportunities in Rochester, NY.</p><p>1.) Joining the recently created Rochester Food Policy Council</p><p>2.) Sharing your feedback with the City and RCSD about how American Rescue Plan Funding should be spent</p><p>3.) Preparing to vote in the June 22nd primaries</p><p>We also review the book "Fulfillment: Winning and Losing in One Click America" by Alec MacGillis.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-144-three-civic-opportunities-in-rochester-food-policy-council-arp-funding-and-primary-elections]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">634b8bc1-b7b5-4878-bebf-f816bdfcba40</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:45:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/89a94e8c-06e0-4653-b5f1-cd02d8c3434e/episode-143.mp3" length="65844555" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>52:54</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>144</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We discuss three important civic opportunities in Rochester, NY.
1.) Joining the recently created Rochester Food Policy Council
2.) Sharing your feedback with the City and RCSD about how American Rescue Plan Funding should be spent
3.) Preparing to vote in the June 22nd primaries
We also review the book &quot;Fulfillment: Winning and Losing in One Click America&quot; by Alec MacGillis.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 143: Critical Race Theory with Dr. Joanne Larson</title><itunes:title>Episode 143: Critical Race Theory with Dr. Joanne Larson</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss Critical Race Theory with Dr. Joanne Larson, the Michael W. Scandling Professor of Education &amp;amp; Associate Director of Research at the Center for Urban Education Success at the University of Rochester&apos;s Warner School of Education.
From national culture wars to local school board elections, Critical Race Theory has become a contested issue. What is Critical Race Theory, and what is it not? How has race and marginality been traditionally been taught in schools? Why might a new conceptual framework, such as the one provided by Critical Race Theory, be needed to provide for better educational and social outcomes?
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss Critical Race Theory with Dr. Joanne Larson, the Michael W. Scandling Professor of Education &amp; Associate Director of Research at the Center for Urban Education Success at the University of Rochester's Warner School of Education.</p><p>From national culture wars to local school board elections, Critical Race Theory has become a contested issue. What is Critical Race Theory, and what is it not? How has race and marginality been traditionally been taught in schools? Why might a new conceptual framework, such as the one provided by Critical Race Theory, be needed to provide for better educational and social outcomes?</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-143-critical-race-theory-with-dr-joanne-larson]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">a79e6750-b0e8-406b-8fde-aaa0f834b4d5</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2021 10:45:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/5762550d-3fc0-4114-acb6-a82d9bc681d1/episode-143.mp3" length="65844555" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>52:54</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>143</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss Critical Race Theory with Dr. Joanne Larson, the Michael W. Scandling Professor of Education and Associate Director of Research at the Center for Urban Education Success at the University of Rochester&apos;s Warner School of Education.
From national culture wars to local school board elections, Critical Race Theory has become a contested issue. What is Critical Race Theory, and what is it not? How has race and marginality been traditionally been taught in schools? Why might a new conceptual framework, such as the one provided by Critical Race Theory, be needed to provide for better educational and social outcomes?
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 142: Countering Disinformation and Preparing for the June 22, 2021 Primary</title><itunes:title>Episode 142: Countering Disinformation and Preparing for the June 22, 2021 Primary</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss the paradox of living in a society split by political parties endorsing two different versions of reality. Do any of your relatives, friends, or co-workers believe in something you see at outlandish? What do we do about the epidemic-like spread of misinformation and disinformation? How do we break through social media-fueled echo chambers? We&apos;ll cover these questions and more.
We&apos;ll also talk about the upcoming June 22nd primary election, which seats are up for election, who is running to fill those seats, and where you can vote early. If you live in Monroe County, NY, you can find all of this information, and more, at the Monroe County Board of Elections webpage: https://www.monroecounty.gov/elections?fbclid=IwAR1t6DkRV4EK52vWuHyrkwjB5kWTMTt_MwgVQk9LFXwQq2ksKL-1e6t3UIY (https://www.monroecounty.gov/elections).
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss the paradox of living in a society split by political parties endorsing two different versions of reality. Do any of your relatives, friends, or co-workers believe in something you see at outlandish? What do we do about the epidemic-like spread of misinformation and disinformation? How do we break through social media-fueled echo chambers? We'll cover these questions and more.</p><p>We'll also talk about the upcoming June 22nd primary election, which seats are up for election, who is running to fill those seats, and where you can vote early. If you live in Monroe County, NY, you can find all of this information, and more, at the Monroe County Board of Elections webpage: <a href="https://www.monroecounty.gov/elections?fbclid=IwAR1t6DkRV4EK52vWuHyrkwjB5kWTMTt_MwgVQk9LFXwQq2ksKL-1e6t3UIY" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.monroecounty.gov/elections</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-142-countering-disinformation-and-preparing-for-the-june-22-2021-primary]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">deb05265-8c44-4937-850a-c96e8b5f4082</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 18:15:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/df62ead2-5857-49ea-a9aa-104cca94703b/episode-142.mp3" length="94681509" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>51:18</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>142</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss the paradox of living in a society split by political parties endorsing two different versions of reality. Do any of your relatives, friends, or co-workers believe in something you see at outlandish? What do we do about the epidemic-like spread of misinformation and disinformation? How do we break through social media-fueled echo chambers? We&apos;ll cover these questions and more.
We&apos;ll also talk about the upcoming June 22nd primary election, which seats are up for election, who is running to fill those seats, and where you can vote early. If you live in Monroe County, NY, you can find all of this information, and more, at the Monroe County Board of Elections webpage: https://www.monroecounty.gov/elections?fbclid=IwAR1t6DkRV4EK52vWuHyrkwjB5kWTMTt_MwgVQk9LFXwQq2ksKL-1e6t3UIY (https://www.monroecounty.gov/elections).</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 141: Legalization of Marijuana in NYS and What&apos;s in the Biden Administration&apos;s $1.8 Trillion American Families Plan</title><itunes:title>Episode 141: Legalization of Marijuana in NYS and What&apos;s in the Biden Administration&apos;s $1.8 Trillion American Families Plan</itunes:title><description>We discuss the legalization of marijuana in New York. We&apos;ll cover what&apos;s legal, how sales and home cultivation will work, and New York&apos;s approach is to rectifying its past over-enforcement of marijuana-related crimes (many of which are, well, no longer crimes).
On the second half of the show we cover what&apos;s in the Biden Administrations proposed $1.8 trillion American Families Plan. This comes after the administration&apos;s multi-trillion dollar American Rescue Plan and American Jobs Plan. Included in the provision are hundreds of billions of dollars for child care, paid leave, free community college, teacher education, child nutrition, and health care affordability.
We think these massive government spending plans are much needed and long overdue, which is counter to the myopic take by congressional Republicans, such as Tim Scott, that any government action beyond cutting taxes and regulations for the wealthiest individuals and corporations is bad government action.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discuss the legalization of marijuana in New York. We'll cover what's legal, how sales and home cultivation will work, and New York's approach is to rectifying its past over-enforcement of marijuana-related crimes (many of which are, well, no longer crimes).</p><p>On the second half of the show we cover what's in the Biden Administrations proposed $1.8 trillion American Families Plan. This comes after the administration's multi-trillion dollar American Rescue Plan and American Jobs Plan. Included in the provision are hundreds of billions of dollars for child care, paid leave, free community college, teacher education, child nutrition, and health care affordability.</p><p>We think these massive government spending plans are much needed and long overdue, which is counter to the myopic take by congressional Republicans, such as Tim Scott, that any government action beyond cutting taxes and regulations for the wealthiest individuals and corporations is bad government action.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-141-legalization-of-marijuana-in-nys-and-whats-in-the-biden-administrations-1-8-trillion-american-families-plan]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">1cd8b9ef-45b2-446f-af12-6a7004fd7e0d</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2021 09:45:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/d720ee63-5768-4f1f-85ee-626353ddef2b/episode-141.mp3" length="61063829" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:56</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>141</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We discuss the legalization of marijuana in New York. We&apos;ll cover what&apos;s legal, how sales and home cultivation will work, and New York&apos;s approach is to rectifying its past over-enforcement of marijuana-related crimes (many of which are, well, no longer crimes).
On the second half of the show we cover what&apos;s in the Biden Administrations proposed $1.8 trillion American Families Plan. This comes after the administration&apos;s multi-trillion dollar American Rescue Plan and American Jobs Plan. Included in the provision are hundreds of billions of dollars for child care, paid leave, free community college, teacher education, child nutrition, and health care affordability.
We think these massive government spending plans are much needed and long overdue, which is counter to the myopic take by congressional Republicans, such as Tim Scott, that any government action beyond cutting taxes and regulations for the wealthiest individuals and corporations is bad government action.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 140: The 51st Earth Day &amp; European Soccer&apos;s Super League</title><itunes:title>Episode 140: The 51st Earth Day &amp; European Soccer&apos;s Super League</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss the honoring of 51st Earth Day and the proposed Super League in European Soccer.
As the world celebrated Earth Day on 4/22, there remains relatively little to actually celebrate in regard to substantive climate policy. Locally, the https://www.climategfl.org/ (Climate Solutions Accelerator of the Genesee-Finger Lakes Region) held a 22-day program promoting climate justice. It&apos;s summit ended with a session reminding us that climate inequities are embedded with race- and class-based inequities as well. We also discuss Rochester&apos;s 2017 Climate Action Plan and the Biden Administration&apos;s pledge to reduce U.S. green house gas emissions by 50% by 2030 based on 2005 levels.
We also discuss the proposed creation of a Super League in European Soccer. This League would be made up of the wealthiest teams and would be a closed league, dramatically reshaping European soccer. Why does this matter? Well, for one thing, it can be seen as another example of the wealthiest trying consolidate wealth and influence. For another thing, the League&apos;s creation is based off models in American sports, and 33% of the proposed 12 Super League teams are owned by American 1%ers or Hedge Funds.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss the honoring of 51st Earth Day and the proposed Super League in European Soccer.</p><p>As the world celebrated Earth Day on 4/22, there remains relatively little to actually celebrate in regard to substantive climate policy. Locally, the <a href="https://www.climategfl.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Climate Solutions Accelerator of the Genesee-Finger Lakes Region</a> held a 22-day program promoting climate justice. It's summit ended with a session reminding us that climate inequities are embedded with race- and class-based inequities as well. We also discuss Rochester's 2017 Climate Action Plan and the Biden Administration's pledge to reduce U.S. green house gas emissions by 50% by 2030 based on 2005 levels.</p><p>We also discuss the proposed creation of a Super League in European Soccer. This League would be made up of the wealthiest teams and would be a closed league, dramatically reshaping European soccer. Why does this matter? Well, for one thing, it can be seen as another example of the wealthiest trying consolidate wealth and influence. For another thing, the League's creation is based off models in American sports, and 33% of the proposed 12 Super League teams are owned by American 1%ers or Hedge Funds.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-140-the-51st-earth-day-european-soccers-super-league]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">c68ac54f-ef6e-4b4e-ae5a-47aa7299c58d</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/86f3e17b-84b7-46d9-88ff-ceec5a56dcf4/episode-140.mp3" length="62203794" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:40</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>140</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss the honoring of 51st Earth Day and the proposed Super League in European Soccer.
As the world celebrated Earth Day on 4/22, there remains relatively little to actually celebrate in regard to substantive climate policy. Locally, the https://www.climategfl.org/ (Climate Solutions Accelerator of the Genesee-Finger Lakes Region) held a 22-day program promoting climate justice. It&apos;s summit ended with a session reminding us that climate inequities are embedded with race- and class-based inequities as well. We also discuss Rochester&apos;s 2017 Climate Action Plan and the Biden Administration&apos;s pledge to reduce U.S. green house gas emissions by 50% by 2030 based on 2005 levels.
We also discuss the proposed creation of a Super League in European Soccer. This League would be made up of the wealthiest teams and would be a closed league, dramatically reshaping European soccer. Why does this matter? Well, for one thing, it can be seen as another example of the wealthiest trying consolidate wealth and influence. For another thing, the League&apos;s creation is based off models in American sports, and 33% of the proposed 12 Super League teams are owned by American 1%ers or Hedge Funds.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 139: Rochester Police Accountability Board&apos;s Proposed Budget &amp; Countering Anti-Vaccine Conspiracies</title><itunes:title>Episode 139: Rochester Police Accountability Board&apos;s Proposed Budget &amp; Countering Anti-Vaccine Conspiracies</itunes:title><description>We discuss the proposed budget of the Rochester Police Accountability Board (PAB). The proposed $5 million annual budget would dramatically expand funding for the PAB, creating three new PAB bureaus that, they claim, would help it do its duties: (1) the Bureau of Officer Accountability to investigate nearly 500 annual complaints against the RPD within 90 days, (2) the Bureau of Systemic Change to lead comprehensive community-driven policing changes, and (3) the Bureau of Administration to ensure the PAB&apos;s operations are accessible and functional. Were this budget to be approved, it would effectively mean that for every $20 the city spends on the RPD it would spend $1 on the PAB. You can learn more about the PAB&apos;s proposed budget here: https://www.cityofrochester.gov/pab/budget/?fbclid=IwAR1RlMuJIe8i3M1nehypArOcxIeeNsTFi5bC9lZoGVVp7Dfda-SjbgPaMCw (https://www.cityofrochester.gov/pab/budget/)
We also discuss the continued troubling rise of disinformation and susceptibility to misinformation through the lens of vaccine conspiracies. Many vaccine skeptics, conspiracy theorists, and right-wing trolls latched onto the federal government&apos;s halt of the Johnson &amp;amp; Johnson vaccine distribution this week. You would be surprised at the extent to which conspiracy theories have embedded into &quot;normal&quot; discourse and &quot;normal&quot; people. We need to take a deep breath and do better at not falling prey to peddlers of misinformation and disinformation.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discuss the proposed budget of the Rochester Police Accountability Board (PAB). The proposed $5 million annual budget would dramatically expand funding for the PAB, creating three new PAB bureaus that, they claim, would help it do its duties: (1) the Bureau of Officer Accountability to investigate nearly 500 annual complaints against the RPD within 90 days, (2) the Bureau of Systemic Change to lead comprehensive community-driven policing changes, and (3) the Bureau of Administration to ensure the PAB's operations are accessible and functional. Were this budget to be approved, it would effectively mean that for every $20 the city spends on the RPD it would spend $1 on the PAB. You can learn more about the PAB's proposed budget here: <a href="https://www.cityofrochester.gov/pab/budget/?fbclid=IwAR1RlMuJIe8i3M1nehypArOcxIeeNsTFi5bC9lZoGVVp7Dfda-SjbgPaMCw" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.cityofrochester.gov/pab/budget/</a></p><p>We also discuss the continued troubling rise of disinformation and susceptibility to misinformation through the lens of vaccine conspiracies. Many vaccine skeptics, conspiracy theorists, and right-wing trolls latched onto the federal government's halt of the Johnson &amp; Johnson vaccine distribution this week. You would be surprised at the extent to which conspiracy theories have embedded into "normal" discourse and "normal" people. We need to take a deep breath and do better at not falling prey to peddlers of misinformation and disinformation.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-139-rochester-police-accountability-boards-proposed-budget-countering-anti-vaccine-conspiracies]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">522cea87-558b-4356-9f27-f7db73422c87</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2021 08:15:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/d7aaceb0-7023-443b-ba92-89daa37f8a82/episode-139.mp3" length="58261448" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:15</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>139</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We discuss the proposed budget of the Rochester Police Accountability Board (PAB). The proposed $5 million annual budget would dramatically expand funding for the PAB, creating three new PAB bureaus that, they claim, would help it do its duties: (1) the Bureau of Officer Accountability to investigate nearly 500 annual complaints against the RPD within 90 days, (2) the Bureau of Systemic Change to lead comprehensive community-driven policing changes, and (3) the Bureau of Administration to ensure the PAB&apos;s operations are accessible and functional. Were this budget to be approved, it would effectively mean that for every $20 the city spends on the RPD it would spend $1 on the PAB. You can learn more about the PAB&apos;s proposed budget here: https://www.cityofrochester.gov/pab/budget/?fbclid=IwAR1RlMuJIe8i3M1nehypArOcxIeeNsTFi5bC9lZoGVVp7Dfda-SjbgPaMCw (https://www.cityofrochester.gov/pab/budget/)
We also discuss the continued troubling rise of disinformation and susceptibility to misinformation through the lens of vaccine conspiracies. Many vaccine skeptics, conspiracy theorists, and right-wing trolls latched onto the federal government&apos;s halt of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine distribution this week. You would be surprised at the extent to which conspiracy theories have embedded into &quot;normal&quot; discourse and &quot;normal&quot; people. We need to take a deep breath and do better at not falling prey to peddlers of misinformation and disinformation.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 138: Defeated Amazon Unionization Effort in Bessemer, Alabama</title><itunes:title>Episode 138: Defeated Amazon Unionization Effort in Bessemer, Alabama</itunes:title><description>We discuss the unionization effort among Amazon warehouse workers in Bessemer, Alabama. Nearly 6,000 workers voted whether to unionize or not with the Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union (RWDSU). Over 3,200 votes were cast, and around 70% of workers voted not to unionize while the the other 30% voted to unionize, defeating the unionization effort.
However, the RWDSU is filing an objection of the results with the National Labor Relations Board, alleging that Amazon &quot;created an atmosphere of confusion, coercion, and/or fear of reprisals&quot; which skewed the Amazon employees towards voting not to unionize.
Amazon&apos;s alleged misconduct include (1) pressuring the United States Postal Service to install a modified mailbox on its campus and encouraging employees to drop their ballots there as opposed to mailing them in outside of supervisor scrutiny, (2) pressuring the local government to change the traffic light timing at the major intersection of the campus to make it harder for labor organizers to connect with employees as they wait at the red light, (3) forcing temp workers to wear uniforms donned with anti-union sloganeering, (4) holding mandatory &quot;information sessions&quot; where management slandered unions, (5) repreatedly blasting workers with emails, texts, posters, and fliers which encouraged them to vote not to unionize, (6) lying to workers that they would be forced to pay hundreds of dollars in union dues if they voted to unionize even though Alabama is a &quot;Right to Work&quot; state, (7) forcing the union to encompass more workers than originally intended so that it would be harder to for labor organizers to mobilize and represent the myriad interests of different categories of workers, (8) and contesting hundreds of ballots cast in the unionization vote.
To be clear, it appears that most--if not all--of these efforts might be found to be within the law as it&apos;s currently written and interpreted, which points to the inordinate power corporations have over labor in unionization efforts. We ask then: why do corporations go through all the trouble to squash unionization efforts? Is it because they genuinely want what&apos;s best for their workers and want them to realize that they would be materially better off with the company&apos;s bargaining compared to the union&apos;s bargaining, or is it because corporations want as much money and power as possible, and they see unions as a threat to their sovereignty? We think the latter is more likely.
Thanks for joining us.  
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discuss the unionization effort among Amazon warehouse workers in Bessemer, Alabama. Nearly 6,000 workers voted whether to unionize or not with the Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union (RWDSU). Over 3,200 votes were cast, and around 70% of workers voted not to unionize while the the other 30% voted to unionize, defeating the unionization effort.</p><p>However, the RWDSU is filing an objection of the results with the National Labor Relations Board, alleging that Amazon "created an atmosphere of confusion, coercion, and/or fear of reprisals" which skewed the Amazon employees towards voting not to unionize.</p><p>Amazon's alleged misconduct include (1) pressuring the United States Postal Service to install a modified mailbox on its campus and encouraging employees to drop their ballots there as opposed to mailing them in outside of supervisor scrutiny, (2) pressuring the local government to change the traffic light timing at the major intersection of the campus to make it harder for labor organizers to connect with employees as they wait at the red light, (3) forcing temp workers to wear uniforms donned with anti-union sloganeering, (4) holding mandatory "information sessions" where management slandered unions, (5) repreatedly blasting workers with emails, texts, posters, and fliers which encouraged them to vote not to unionize, (6) lying to workers that they would be forced to pay hundreds of dollars in union dues if they voted to unionize even though Alabama is a "Right to Work" state, (7) forcing the union to encompass more workers than originally intended so that it would be harder to for labor organizers to mobilize and represent the myriad interests of different categories of workers, (8) and contesting hundreds of ballots cast in the unionization vote.</p><p>To be clear, it appears that most--if not all--of these efforts might be found to be within the law as it's currently written and interpreted, which points to the inordinate power corporations have over labor in unionization efforts. We ask then: why do corporations go through all the trouble to squash unionization efforts? Is it because they genuinely want what's best for their workers and want them to realize that they would be materially better off with the company's bargaining compared to the union's bargaining, or is it because corporations want as much money and power as possible, and they see unions as a threat to their sovereignty? We think the latter is more likely.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.  </p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-138-defeated-amazon-unionization-effort-in-bessemer-alabama]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">4ea5e5bb-674e-4d0f-aa3f-22dfc4d9780e</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2021 10:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/111c3b4b-0200-4d3d-831f-d9d8b24dcaf9/episode-138.mp3" length="63184888" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>56:45</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>138</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We discuss the unionization effort among Amazon warehouse workers in Bessemer, Alabama. Nearly 6,000 workers voted whether to unionize or not with the Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union (RWDSU). Over 3,200 votes were cast, and around 70% of workers voted not to unionize while the the other 30% voted to unionize, defeating the unionization effort.
However, the RWDSU is filing an objection of the results with the National Labor Relations Board, alleging that Amazon &quot;created an atmosphere of confusion, coercion, and/or fear of reprisals&quot; which skewed the Amazon employees towards voting not to unionize.
Amazon&apos;s alleged misconduct include (1) pressuring the United States Postal Service to install a modified mailbox on its campus and encouraging employees to drop their ballots there as opposed to mailing them in outside of supervisor scrutiny, (2) pressuring the local government to change the traffic light timing at the major intersection of the campus to make it harder for labor organizers to connect with employees as they wait at the red light, (3) forcing temp workers to wear uniforms donned with anti-union sloganeering, (4) holding mandatory &quot;information sessions&quot; where management slandered unions, (5) repreatedly blasting workers with emails, texts, posters, and fliers which encouraged them to vote not to unionize, (6) lying to workers that they would be forced to pay hundreds of dollars in union dues if they voted to unionize even though Alabama is a &quot;Right to Work&quot; state, (7) forcing the union to encompass more workers than originally intended so that it would be harder to for labor organizers to mobilize and represent the myriad interests of different categories of workers, (8) and contesting hundreds of ballots cast in the unionization vote.
To be clear, it appears that most--if not all--of these efforts might be found to be within the law as it&apos;s currently written and interpreted, which points to the inordinate power corporations have over labor in unionization efforts. We ask then: why do corporations go through all the trouble to squash unionization efforts? Is it because they genuinely want what&apos;s best for their workers and want them to realize that they would be materially better off with the company&apos;s bargaining compared to the union&apos;s bargaining, or is it because corporations want as much money and power as possible, and they see unions as a threat to their sovereignty? We think the latter is more likely.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 137: The $2.3 Trillion American Jobs Plan</title><itunes:title>Episode 137: The $2.3 Trillion American Jobs Plan</itunes:title><description>We discuss the Biden Administration’s proposed $2.3 trillion infrastructure and green energy plan, also known as the American Jobs Plan. It would be one of the largest public, government investments in years. Included in the plan would be hundreds of billions of dollars for rebuilding the nations roads, bridges, and tunnels; expanding high speed broadband; upgrading schools; strengthening the power grid and shifting towards clean energy; boosting the electric vehicle market; expanding public transportation; investing in affordable housing; investing in research and development and job training programs; and supporting the caretaking economy. You can read more about what’s in the plan here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/31/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan/ (https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/31/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan/). We think these are great investments to make. 
One of the ways the Biden administration is proposing to pay for the plan is through increasing taxes on the wealthiest corporations. We also think that’s a good idea, considering that America’s wealthiest corporations are often highly profitable and evade paying taxes through a variety of mechanisms. This is especially true given that recent studies reaffirm that the wealthiest individuals and corporations abscond from paying at least hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes every year, which we’ll discuss in the second half of our show (for example (1) https://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/latest/641/ (https://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/latest/641/) and (2) https://itep.org/55-profitable-corporations-zero-corporate-tax/)
Thanks for joining us. 
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discuss the Biden Administration’s proposed $2.3 trillion infrastructure and green energy plan, also known as the American Jobs Plan. It would be one of the largest public, government investments in years. Included in the plan would be hundreds of billions of dollars for rebuilding the nations roads, bridges, and tunnels; expanding high speed broadband; upgrading schools; strengthening the power grid and shifting towards clean energy; boosting the electric vehicle market; expanding public transportation; investing in affordable housing; investing in research and development and job training programs; and supporting the caretaking economy. You can read more about what’s in the plan here: <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/31/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/31/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan/</a>. We think these are great investments to make. </p><p>One of the ways the Biden administration is proposing to pay for the plan is through increasing taxes on the wealthiest corporations. We also think that’s a good idea, considering that America’s wealthiest corporations are often highly profitable and evade paying taxes through a variety of mechanisms. This is especially true given that recent studies reaffirm that the wealthiest individuals and corporations abscond from paying at least hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes every year, which we’ll discuss in the second half of our show (for example (1) <a href="https://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/latest/641/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/latest/641/</a> and (2) https://itep.org/55-profitable-corporations-zero-corporate-tax/)</p><p>Thanks for joining us. </p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-137-the-2-3-trillion-american-jobs-plan]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">11df4c43-8b4e-4af4-b972-14734f8a2e6b</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2021 10:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/b3ca31ab-09eb-4acc-a0b7-6c169b52e0ce/episode-137.mp3" length="65332156" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:32</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>137</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We discuss the Biden Administration’s proposed $2.3 trillion infrastructure and green energy plan, also known as the American Jobs Plan. It would be one of the largest public, government investments in years. Included in the plan would be hundreds of billions of dollars for rebuilding the nations roads, bridges, and tunnels; expanding high speed broadband; upgrading schools; strengthening the power grid and shifting towards clean energy; boosting the electric vehicle market; expanding public transportation; investing in affordable housing; investing in research and development and job training programs; and supporting the caretaking economy. You can read more about what’s in the plan here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/31/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan/ (https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/31/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan/). We think these are great investments to make. 
One of the ways the Biden administration is proposing to pay for the plan is through increasing taxes on the wealthiest corporations. We also think that’s a good idea, considering that America’s wealthiest corporations are often highly profitable and evade paying taxes through a variety of mechanisms. This is especially true given that recent studies reaffirm that the wealthiest individuals and corporations abscond from paying at least hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes every year, which we’ll discuss in the second half of our show (for example (1) https://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/latest/641/ (https://trac.syr.edu/tracirs/latest/641/) and (2) https://itep.org/55-profitable-corporations-zero-corporate-tax/)
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 136: Monroe County&apos;s Report of the Comission on Racial and Structural Equity (RASE)</title><itunes:title>Episode 136: Monroe County&apos;s Report of the Comission on Racial and Structural Equity (RASE)</itunes:title><description>We discuss the recently released Report of the Commission on Racial and Structural Equity (RASE) in Monroe County, New York. The RASE Commission was formed last Summer after the murder of George Floyed. It&apos;s a joint City-County commission whose goal is to evaluate and propose changes to local laws and policies in order to fight structural racism.
You can read the report at: https://rocrase.com/?fbclid=IwAR0vOUryy5JaGe4ttBxEZhlSZWtahXcWZy6d5obxUfQHJRpcuyZCwcpl0Ho (https://rocrase.com/)
We will specifically cover the Job Creation and Business Development sections of the report. While we find that the Commission&apos;s proposals to create more job opportunities is certainly more helpful than hurtful, we find the proposals to be lacking overall. We think there were opportunities to be more assertive in regards to promoting job creation and fighting structural racism, such as by raising the minimum wage, investing in job training programs, expanding public transit, and creating a universal basic income system.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discuss the recently released Report of the Commission on Racial and Structural Equity (RASE) in Monroe County, New York. The RASE Commission was formed last Summer after the murder of George Floyed. It's a joint City-County commission whose goal is to evaluate and propose changes to local laws and policies in order to fight structural racism.</p><p>You can read the report at: <a href="https://rocrase.com/?fbclid=IwAR0vOUryy5JaGe4ttBxEZhlSZWtahXcWZy6d5obxUfQHJRpcuyZCwcpl0Ho" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://rocrase.com/</a></p><p>We will specifically cover the Job Creation and Business Development sections of the report. While we find that the Commission's proposals to create more job opportunities is certainly more helpful than hurtful, we find the proposals to be lacking overall. We think there were opportunities to be more assertive in regards to promoting job creation and fighting structural racism, such as by raising the minimum wage, investing in job training programs, expanding public transit, and creating a universal basic income system.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-136-monroe-countys-report-of-the-comission-on-racial-and-structural-equity-rase]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">46a4dbdd-05df-4892-b0e1-70a17e2e9b55</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2021 09:45:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/b5844afa-d1ee-44a6-a13c-dab49d6c5324/episode-136.mp3" length="92550623" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>53:35</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>136</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We discuss the recently released Report of the Commission on Racial and Structural Equity (RASE) in Monroe County, New York. The RASE Commission was formed last Summer after the murder of George Floyed. It&apos;s a joint City-County commission whose goal is to evaluate and propose changes to local laws and policies in order to fight structural racism.
You can read the report at: https://rocrase.com/?fbclid=IwAR0vOUryy5JaGe4ttBxEZhlSZWtahXcWZy6d5obxUfQHJRpcuyZCwcpl0Ho (https://rocrase.com/)
We will specifically cover the Job Creation and Business Development sections of the report. While we find that the Commission&apos;s proposals to create more job opportunities is certainly more helpful than hurtful, we find the proposals to be lacking overall. We think there were opportunities to be more assertive in regards to promoting job creation and fighting structural racism, such as by raising the minimum wage, investing in job training programs, expanding public transit, and creating a universal basic income system.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 135: New York State Criminal Justice Reforms</title><itunes:title>Episode 135: New York State Criminal Justice Reforms</itunes:title><description>In this episode we cover several proposals in New York State to reform the criminal justice system, free up billions of dollars in state revenue to spend on other social services, and rehabilitate more people back into society. Many of these proposals are covered in a recent report by The Center for Justice called &quot;https://centerforjustice.columbia.edu/news/new-report-unlocking-billions-fiscal-analysis-pending-justice-reforms-new-york-state (Unlocking Billions: A Fiscal Analysis of Pending Justice Reforms in New York State).&quot;
The proposals include reforming the state&apos;s parole system, restarting college classes for inmates, reducing the use of solitary confinement, closing excess prisons, and legalization marijuana. All told, the Center for Justice estimates these efforts would unlock for New York $1.5 billion a year or $15 billion over the next decade, to say nothing of the positive economic benefits that would come from successfully rehabilitating former inmates back into society. Some of these efforts have gained recent steam, such as the New York State Senate passing the HALT Solitary Confinement Act.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover several proposals in New York State to reform the criminal justice system, free up billions of dollars in state revenue to spend on other social services, and rehabilitate more people back into society. Many of these proposals are covered in a recent report by The Center for Justice called "<a href="https://centerforjustice.columbia.edu/news/new-report-unlocking-billions-fiscal-analysis-pending-justice-reforms-new-york-state" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Unlocking Billions: A Fiscal Analysis of Pending Justice Reforms in New York State</a>."</p><p>The proposals include reforming the state's parole system, restarting college classes for inmates, reducing the use of solitary confinement, closing excess prisons, and legalization marijuana. All told, the Center for Justice estimates these efforts would unlock for New York $1.5 billion a year or $15 billion over the next decade, to say nothing of the positive economic benefits that would come from successfully rehabilitating former inmates back into society. Some of these efforts have gained recent steam, such as the New York State Senate passing the HALT Solitary Confinement Act.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-135-new-york-state-criminal-justice-reforms]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">a89e317e-157d-4796-9a00-f1e3393661d4</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2021 10:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/f7918b18-8b37-44e9-b803-80241ffd3a12/episode-135.mp3" length="60827323" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:22</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>135</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we cover several proposals in New York State to reform the criminal justice system, free up billions of dollars in state revenue to spend on other social services, and rehabilitate more people back into society. Many of these proposals are covered in a recent report by The Center for Justice called &quot;https://centerforjustice.columbia.edu/news/new-report-unlocking-billions-fiscal-analysis-pending-justice-reforms-new-york-state (Unlocking Billions: A Fiscal Analysis of Pending Justice Reforms in New York State).&quot;
The proposals include reforming the state&apos;s parole system, restarting college classes for inmates, reducing the use of solitary confinement, closing excess prisons, and legalization marijuana. All told, the Center for Justice estimates these efforts would unlock for New York $1.5 billion a year or $15 billion over the next decade, to say nothing of the positive economic benefits that would come from successfully rehabilitating former inmates back into society. Some of these efforts have gained recent steam, such as the New York State Senate passing the HALT Solitary Confinement Act.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 134: What&apos;s in the $1.9 Trillion American Rescue Plan</title><itunes:title>Episode 134: What&apos;s in the $1.9 Trillion American Rescue Plan</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss what&apos;s in the American Rescue Plan, the $1.9 trillion stimulus package passed this week by Democrats. From stimulus checks, to unemployment benefits, to housing assistance, to state and local government aid, to lowered health insurance costs, to expanded child care tax credits, to SNAP increases, the plan includes a lot of provisions that materially benefit most Americans&apos; lives. Join us to learn the specifics of what&apos;s in the plan and how YOU might benefit.
We also highlight the latest exhibitions at the Rochester Contemporary Art Center, including a piece by WXIR&apos;s very own Darien Lamen.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss what's in the American Rescue Plan, the $1.9 trillion stimulus package passed this week by Democrats. From stimulus checks, to unemployment benefits, to housing assistance, to state and local government aid, to lowered health insurance costs, to expanded child care tax credits, to SNAP increases, the plan includes a lot of provisions that materially benefit most Americans' lives. Join us to learn the specifics of what's in the plan and how YOU might benefit.</p><p>We also highlight the latest exhibitions at the Rochester Contemporary Art Center, including a piece by WXIR's very own Darien Lamen.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-134-whats-in-the-1-9-trillion-american-rescue-plan]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">c9e7e177-7474-490e-9269-429cd78b71bd</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 01:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/75a576ed-5be5-4a20-b91d-a01738b5b396/episode-134.mp3" length="62670921" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:02</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>134</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss what&apos;s in the American Rescue Plan, the $1.9 trillion stimulus package passed this week by Democrats. From stimulus checks, to unemployment benefits, to housing assistance, to state and local government aid, to lowered health insurance costs, to expanded child care tax credits, to SNAP increases, the plan includes a lot of provisions that materially benefit most Americans&apos; lives. Join us to learn the specifics of what&apos;s in the plan and how YOU might benefit.
We also highlight the latest exhibitions at the Rochester Contemporary Art Center, including a piece by WXIR&apos;s very own Darien Lamen.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 133: Raising the Minimum Wage and Universal Basic Income - Morally and Practically the Right Thing to Do</title><itunes:title>Episode 133: Raising the Minimum Wage and Universal Basic Income - Morally and Practically the Right Thing to Do</itunes:title><description>In this episode we cover the latest on raising the minimum wage and establishing universal basic income.
Minimum wage: The Senate recently voted 58-42 to not overrule the Senate Parliamentarian&apos;s opinion that the Raise the Wage Act of 2021 could not be included as part of the $1.9 trillion stimulus package, on grounds that it did not meet requirements for the reconciliation procedure being used to pass the aforementioned. It&apos;s incredibly disappointing--to say the least--that zero Senate Republicans support raising the wages of 32 million Americans. It&apos;s also disappointing that all Democrats are not wielding government power to make material benefits to people&apos;s lives, power Republicans would surely use to punish most others. The federal minimum wage is not a living wage. If we are to create the conditions for a capitalist society, human beings deserve a living wage.


Universal basic income: A recent study of a universal basic income program in Stockton, California reveals how recipients of UBI experienced increased employment and productivity; reduced stress, depression, and anxiety; increased ability to pay off debt; and the spending of money on necessities, not frivolous items or illegal items. UBI should be considered as a serious and pertinent policy for meeting human needs, boosting economic activity, and contributing to social cohesion.


Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover the latest on raising the minimum wage and establishing universal basic income.</p><p>Minimum wage: The Senate recently voted 58-42 to not overrule the Senate Parliamentarian's opinion that the Raise the Wage Act of 2021 could not be included as part of the $1.9 trillion stimulus package, on grounds that it did not meet requirements for the reconciliation procedure being used to pass the aforementioned. It's incredibly disappointing--to say the least--that zero Senate Republicans support raising the wages of 32 million Americans. It's also disappointing that all Democrats are not wielding government power to make material benefits to people's lives, power Republicans would surely use to punish most others. The federal minimum wage is not a living wage. If we are to create the conditions for a capitalist society, human beings deserve a living wage.</p><p><br></p><p>Universal basic income: A recent study of a universal basic income program in Stockton, California reveals how recipients of UBI experienced increased employment and productivity; reduced stress, depression, and anxiety; increased ability to pay off debt; and the spending of money on necessities, not frivolous items or illegal items. UBI should be considered as a serious and pertinent policy for meeting human needs, boosting economic activity, and contributing to social cohesion.</p><p><br></p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-133-raising-the-minimum-wage-and-universal-basic-income-morally-and-practically-the-right-thing-to-do]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">91c7d025-1e42-4fd7-b510-de653c2b5f2e</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2021 18:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/8de9dba7-6516-4b9c-821d-7e2d59c1560e/episode-133-converted.mp3" length="52641930" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:50</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>133</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we cover the latest on raising the minimum wage and establishing universal basic income.
Minimum wage: The Senate recently voted 58-42 to not overrule the Senate Parliamentarian&apos;s opinion that the Raise the Wage Act of 2021 could not be included as part of the $1.9 trillion stimulus package, on grounds that it did not meet requirements for the reconciliation procedure being used to pass the aforementioned. It&apos;s incredibly disappointing--to say the least--that zero Senate Republicans support raising the wages of 32 million Americans. It&apos;s also disappointing that all Democrats are not wielding government power to make material benefits to people&apos;s lives, power Republicans would surely use to punish most others. The federal minimum wage is not a living wage. If we are to create the conditions for a capitalist society, human beings deserve a living wage.


Universal basic income: A recent study of a universal basic income program in Stockton, California reveals how recipients of UBI experienced increased employment and productivity; reduced stress, depression, and anxiety; increased ability to pay off debt; and the spending of money on necessities, not frivolous items or illegal items. UBI should be considered as a serious and pertinent policy for meeting human needs, boosting economic activity, and contributing to social cohesion.


Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 132: Raising Taxes on the Wealthiest in NYS - The Invest in Our NY Act</title><itunes:title>Episode 132: Raising Taxes on the Wealthiest in NYS - The Invest in Our NY Act</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss proposals to raise taxes on ultra-millionaires and billionaires in NYS. COVID-19 has both created and exacerbated economic crises for millions of New Yorkers, and New York faces a $15 billion budget shortfall this year, with tens of billions of dollars expected in shortfalls for years to come if things do not change. 
To combat these issues, a growing group of NYS Legislators is proposing bills to raise taxes on the wealthiest. The Invest in Our New York Act combines many of these bills, including: (1) establishing more of a progressive income tax structure by raising the tax rates on those making around $300,000 a year or above, (2) increasing the capital gains tax to tax capital gains similarly to income, (3) increasing the &quot;heir&apos;s tax&quot; to ensure the exorbitant intergenerational wealth of the state&apos;s wealthiest is subject to fair taxation, (4) establishing a billionaire&apos;s tax specifically aimed at fairly taxing New York&apos;s 120 billionaires collectively worth over $600 billion, (5) increasing the corporate tax to the level seen before the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and (6) establishing a tax on financial transactions in the financial markets, similar to what&apos;s seen in other financial centers like London and Hong Kong. If passed, these efforts would raise over $50 billion for New York State, helping fund social services for ALL New Yorkers. 
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss proposals to raise taxes on ultra-millionaires and billionaires in NYS. COVID-19 has both created and exacerbated economic crises for millions of New Yorkers, and New York faces a $15 billion budget shortfall this year, with tens of billions of dollars expected in shortfalls for years to come if things do not change. </p><p>To combat these issues, a growing group of NYS Legislators is proposing bills to raise taxes on the wealthiest. The Invest in Our New York Act combines many of these bills, including: (1) establishing more of a progressive income tax structure by raising the tax rates on those making around $300,000 a year or above, (2) increasing the capital gains tax to tax capital gains similarly to income, (3) increasing the "heir's tax" to ensure the exorbitant intergenerational wealth of the state's wealthiest is subject to fair taxation, (4) establishing a billionaire's tax specifically aimed at fairly taxing New York's 120 billionaires collectively worth over $600 billion, (5) increasing the corporate tax to the level seen before the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and (6) establishing a tax on financial transactions in the financial markets, similar to what's seen in other financial centers like London and Hong Kong. If passed, these efforts would raise over $50 billion for New York State, helping fund social services for ALL New Yorkers. </p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-132-raising-taxes-on-the-wealthiest-in-nys-the-invest-in-our-ny-act]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">64386a34-0d23-4daa-bcb0-4010875b301b</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:18:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/34616418-c02a-4c35-bf50-01bbb1231428/episode-132.mp3" length="53069927" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>46:52</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>132</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss proposals to raise taxes on ultra-millionaires and billionaires in NYS. COVID-19 has both created and exacerbated economic crises for millions of New Yorkers, and New York faces a $15 billion budget shortfall this year, with tens of billions of dollars expected in shortfalls for years to come if things do not change. 
To combat these issues, a growing group of NYS Legislators is proposing bills to raise taxes on the wealthiest. The Invest in Our New York Act combines many of these bills, including: (1) establishing more of a progressive income tax structure by raising the tax rates on those making around $300,000 a year or above, (2) increasing the capital gains tax to tax capital gains similarly to income, (3) increasing the &quot;heir&apos;s tax&quot; to ensure the exorbitant intergenerational wealth of the state&apos;s wealthiest is subject to fair taxation, (4) establishing a billionaire&apos;s tax specifically aimed at fairly taxing New York&apos;s 120 billionaires collectively worth over $600 billion, (5) increasing the corporate tax to the level seen before the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and (6) establishing a tax on financial transactions in the financial markets, similar to what&apos;s seen in other financial centers like London and Hong Kong. If passed, these efforts would raise over $50 billion for New York State, helping fund social services for ALL New Yorkers. 
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 131: The Fight for $15 - Raising the Minimum Wage</title><itunes:title>Episode 131: The Fight for $15 - Raising the Minimum Wage</itunes:title><description>In this episode we talk about the Fight for $15. Wages in general, and the minimum wage in particular, have decreased in purchasing power in the U.S. over the past 50 years. The federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 an hour, which is around $15,000 per year for someone who works full-time in a minimum wage job. According to the Economic Policy Institute, the current minimum wage is 29% lower than what it was in 1968, when adjusted for inflation. When adjusted for productivity growth, the minimum wage should be around $24 an hour today. 
Although 29 states have a minimum wage above the federal rate of $7.25 an hour, the vast majority of states do not have a $15 minimum wage, and we argue no state has a minimum wage that is a living wage. 
Democrats propose raising the national minimum wage to $15 an hour through the Raise the Wage Act of 2021, as part of their proposed $1.9 trillion stimulus package. After this show aired, we learned that the Senate Parliamentarian ruled that Democrats could not include their minimum wage provision as part of the stimulus package, making the minimum wage increase nearly impossible to pass without any Republican support. Still, the fight does and should continue. 
We also cover the University of Rochester announcing that it will guarantee a $15 minimum wage for all of its positions by the end of 2022, and we cover the winter weather and power outages in Texas which is a perfect storm (pun intended!) of climate change, privatization, de-regulation, lack of belief in and funding for a strong government, and a culture of individualism. 
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we talk about the Fight for $15. Wages in general, and the minimum wage in particular, have decreased in purchasing power in the U.S. over the past 50 years. The federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 an hour, which is around $15,000 per year for someone who works full-time in a minimum wage job. According to the Economic Policy Institute, the current minimum wage is 29% lower than what it was in 1968, when adjusted for inflation. When adjusted for productivity growth, the minimum wage should be around $24 an hour today. </p><p>Although 29 states have a minimum wage above the federal rate of $7.25 an hour, the vast majority of states do not have a $15 minimum wage, and we argue no state has a minimum wage that is a living wage. </p><p>Democrats propose raising the national minimum wage to $15 an hour through the Raise the Wage Act of 2021, as part of their proposed $1.9 trillion stimulus package. After this show aired, we learned that the Senate Parliamentarian ruled that Democrats could not include their minimum wage provision as part of the stimulus package, making the minimum wage increase nearly impossible to pass without any Republican support. Still, the fight does and should continue. </p><p>We also cover the University of Rochester announcing that it will guarantee a $15 minimum wage for all of its positions by the end of 2022, and we cover the winter weather and power outages in Texas which is a perfect storm (pun intended!) of climate change, privatization, de-regulation, lack of belief in and funding for a strong government, and a culture of individualism. </p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-131-the-fight-for-15-raising-the-minimum-wage]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">4d4dc584-3913-48ac-a50e-00c3bb4a7d69</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:15:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/980bdcca-fa02-4f9f-a9d0-a746167d15e3/episode-131.mp3" length="63685478" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:48</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>131</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we talk about the Fight for $15. Wages in general, and the minimum wage in particular, have decreased in purchasing power in the U.S. over the past 50 years. The federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 an hour, which is around $15,000 per year for someone who works full-time in a minimum wage job. According to the Economic Policy Institute, the current minimum wage is 29% lower than what it was in 1968, when adjusted for inflation. When adjusted for productivity growth, the minimum wage should be around $24 an hour today. 
Although 29 states have a minimum wage above the federal rate of $7.25 an hour, the vast majority of states do not have a $15 minimum wage, and we argue no state has a minimum wage that is a living wage. 
Democrats propose raising the national minimum wage to $15 an hour through the Raise the Wage Act of 2021, as part of their proposed $1.9 trillion stimulus package. After this show aired, we learned that the Senate Parliamentarian ruled that Democrats could not include their minimum wage provision as part of the stimulus package, making the minimum wage increase nearly impossible to pass without any Republican support. Still, the fight does and should continue. 
We also cover the University of Rochester announcing that it will guarantee a $15 minimum wage for all of its positions by the end of 2022, and we cover the winter weather and power outages in Texas which is a perfect storm (pun intended!) of climate change, privatization, de-regulation, lack of belief in and funding for a strong government, and a culture of individualism. 
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 130: Rochester, NY&apos;s Year in Politics - From the CABLE Act to the RPD</title><itunes:title>Episode 130: Rochester, NY&apos;s Year in Politics - From the CABLE Act to the RPD</itunes:title><description>In this episode we revisit the top political stories of the past year in Rochester, NY. Local news can be harder to follow than national news, and it&apos;s been a dizzying year of events. 
From Democrats winning, for the first time in decades, the County Executive in 2019, to the Republicans attempting to pass the CABLE Act and passing a later-repealed &quot;police annoyance law.&quot; From Democratic party infighting over their Elections Commissioner, to the murder of Daniel Prude, to infighting over this year&apos;s budget, all the way to this week&apos;s latest news: the RPD handcuffing and pepper spraying a 9-year old girl. 
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we revisit the top political stories of the past year in Rochester, NY. Local news can be harder to follow than national news, and it's been a dizzying year of events. </p><p>From Democrats winning, for the first time in decades, the County Executive in 2019, to the Republicans attempting to pass the CABLE Act and passing a later-repealed "police annoyance law." From Democratic party infighting over their Elections Commissioner, to the murder of Daniel Prude, to infighting over this year's budget, all the way to this week's latest news: the RPD handcuffing and pepper spraying a 9-year old girl. </p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-130-rochester-nys-year-in-politics-from-the-cable-act-to-the-rpd]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">b0eded56-9f78-49be-b52c-86b58410dd6c</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2021 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/89da577a-c506-496a-b12e-0d3c6e7282b2/episode-130.mp3" length="37135368" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:15</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>130</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we revisit the top political stories of the past year in Rochester, NY. Local news can be harder to follow than national news, and it&apos;s been a dizzying year of events. 
From Democrats winning, for the first time in decades, the County Executive in 2019, to the Republicans attempting to pass the CABLE Act and passing a later-repealed &quot;police annoyance law.&quot; From Democratic party infighting over their Elections Commissioner, to the murder of Daniel Prude, to infighting over this year&apos;s budget, all the way to this week&apos;s latest news: the RPD handcuffing and pepper spraying a 9-year old girl. 
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 129: Gamestop&apos;s Stocks and Lyft&apos;s Priority Mode</title><itunes:title>Episode 129: Gamestop&apos;s Stocks and Lyft&apos;s Priority Mode</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss Lyft and Gamestop.
Ride-sharing company Lyft recently instituted a new policy for its drivers called &quot;priority mode.&quot; If drivers opt-in to priority mode, Lyft&apos;s algorithms, which match drivers with customers wanting a ride, will give drivers priority over non-priority mode drivers, meaning priority mode drivers will be more likely to be given more work so they can, in theory, make more money. The catch? Priority mode drivers&apos; hourly pay rate will be reduced by 10%. 
This effectively means more work for less pay for many of the most vulnerable workers in our increasingly gig economy. That is entirely antithetical to the &quot;logic&quot; of the free market, where increased productivity and increased labor should equate to more pay, not less. People shouldn&apos;t be expected to do more work for less pay. 
We also discuss Gamestop&apos;s meteoric stock rise thanks to r/WallStreetBets and how this is a great example showing the perverse, non-productive, and manipulative qualities of our financialized economy.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss Lyft and Gamestop.</p><p>Ride-sharing company Lyft recently instituted a new policy for its drivers called "priority mode." If drivers opt-in to priority mode, Lyft's algorithms, which match drivers with customers wanting a ride, will give drivers priority over non-priority mode drivers, meaning priority mode drivers will be more likely to be given more work so they can, in theory, make more money. The catch? Priority mode drivers' hourly pay rate will be reduced by 10%. </p><p>This effectively means more work for less pay for many of the most vulnerable workers in our increasingly gig economy. That is entirely antithetical to the "logic" of the free market, where increased productivity and increased labor <em>should</em> equate to more pay, not less. People shouldn't be expected to do more work for less pay. </p><p>We also discuss Gamestop's meteoric stock rise thanks to r/WallStreetBets and how this is a great example showing the perverse, non-productive, and manipulative qualities of our financialized economy.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-129-gamestops-stocks-and-lyfts-priority-mode]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">9f025885-8c7a-4b11-8da8-e0bae27e0566</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 14:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/cd63f481-e093-44e5-851b-8263e9662d3f/episode-129.mp3" length="37077156" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>56:45</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>129</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss Lyft and Gamestop.
Ride-sharing company Lyft recently instituted a new policy for its drivers called &quot;priority mode.&quot; If drivers opt-in to priority mode, Lyft&apos;s algorithms, which match drivers with customers wanting a ride, will give drivers priority over non-priority mode drivers, meaning priority mode drivers will be more likely to be given more work so they can, in theory, make more money. The catch? Priority mode drivers&apos; hourly pay rate will be reduced by 10%. 
This effectively means more work for less pay for many of the most vulnerable workers in our increasingly gig economy. That is entirely antithetical to the &quot;logic&quot; of the free market, where increased productivity and increased labor should equate to more pay, not less. People shouldn&apos;t be expected to do more work for less pay. 
We also discuss Gamestop&apos;s meteoric stock rise thanks to r/WallStreetBets and how this is a great example showing the perverse, non-productive, and manipulative qualities of our financialized economy.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 128: Bernie Memes and the First Executive Orders of the Biden Presidency</title><itunes:title>Episode 128: Bernie Memes and the First Executive Orders of the Biden Presidency</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss the best photo of 2021...Bernie Sanders sitting bundled up during Biden&apos;s inauguration. We never thought there&apos;d be a better photo than the dude stealing the Speaker&apos;s Podium during the June 6th incursion into the capital, but this just might do it.
We also discuss the first acts of the Biden presidency, including signing 17 executive orders on his first day in office. Among these orders are a cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline, a stoppage of border wall construction, an abolition of the 1776 commission, a 100 day mask challenge, a recommittment to the WHO and the Paris Climate Accords, and more, a nationwide extension of the moratorium on evictions and foreclosures, an extension on the pause of federal student loan interest accrual and payments, and more.
Good stuff, but Democrats should continue to push as hard and as fast as they can for a material politics than benefits America&apos;s working and poor classes and to strengthen or reform some institutions in the interests of Democratic sustainability.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss the best photo of 2021...Bernie Sanders sitting bundled up during Biden's inauguration. We never thought there'd be a better photo than the dude stealing the Speaker's Podium during the June 6th incursion into the capital, but this just might do it.</p><p>We also discuss the first acts of the Biden presidency, including signing 17 executive orders on his first day in office. Among these orders are a cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline, a stoppage of border wall construction, an abolition of the 1776 commission, a 100 day mask challenge, a recommittment to the WHO and the Paris Climate Accords, and more, a nationwide extension of the moratorium on evictions and foreclosures, an extension on the pause of federal student loan interest accrual and payments, and more.</p><p>Good stuff, but Democrats should continue to push as hard and as fast as they can for a material politics than benefits America's working and poor classes and to strengthen or reform some institutions in the interests of Democratic sustainability.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-128-bernie-memes-and-the-first-executive-orders-of-the-biden-presidency]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">b3f0e9e6-7374-4807-861c-af9ee419ef46</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/797f55f4-15cf-4b12-9a97-ca11aafe6b81/episode-128.mp3" length="37142748" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>56:52</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>128</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss the best photo of 2021...Bernie Sanders sitting bundled up during Biden&apos;s inauguration. We never thought there&apos;d be a better photo than the dude stealing the Speaker&apos;s Podium during the June 6th incursion into the capital, but this just might do it.
We also discuss the first acts of the Biden presidency, including signing 17 executive orders on his first day in office. Among these orders are a cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline, a stoppage of border wall construction, an abolition of the 1776 commission, a 100 day mask challenge, a recommittment to the WHO and the Paris Climate Accords, and more, a nationwide extension of the moratorium on evictions and foreclosures, an extension on the pause of federal student loan interest accrual and payments, and more.
Good stuff, but Democrats should continue to push as hard and as fast as they can for a material politics than benefits America&apos;s working and poor classes and to strengthen or reform some institutions in the interests of Democratic sustainability.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 127: Trump&apos;s Social Media Ban and Biden&apos;s Proposed Stimulus Package</title><itunes:title>Episode 127: Trump&apos;s Social Media Ban and Biden&apos;s Proposed Stimulus Package</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss Trump&apos;s ban on Twitter and Facebook. We believe the ban isn&apos;t a perfect solution, but it&apos;s long overdue. 
We also discuss Biden&apos;s proposed $1.9 trillion stimulus package, pledging more unemployment assistance and stimulus checks and funding state and local governments.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss Trump's ban on Twitter and Facebook. We believe the ban isn't a perfect solution, but it's long overdue. </p><p>We also discuss Biden's proposed $1.9 trillion stimulus package, pledging more unemployment assistance and stimulus checks and funding state and local governments.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-127-trumps-social-media-ban-and-bidens-proposed-stimulus-package]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">7a9d8b77-ba2c-4e89-a763-749854381524</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/7287f1ff-811e-413e-8b7a-cb1136ebef5b/episode-127.mp3" length="37360332" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>56:49</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>127</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss Trump&apos;s ban on Twitter and Facebook. We believe the ban isn&apos;t a perfect solution, but it&apos;s long overdue. 
We also discuss Biden&apos;s proposed $1.9 trillion stimulus package, pledging more unemployment assistance and stimulus checks and funding state and local governments.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 126: America&apos;s Red Letter Day - January 6th, 2021</title><itunes:title>Episode 126: America&apos;s Red Letter Day - January 6th, 2021</itunes:title><description>Wednesday, January 6th, 2021 was a red letter day in American history. We woke up to surprising news of Democrats winning both run-off Senate seats in Georgia, tipping the balance of power in the Senate. We went to bed to even more surprising news of pro-Trump supporters invading the U.S. capital over factually, empirically, objectively false information.
We&apos;ll offer our takes on both momentous events.
Firstly, we hope that Democrats use their majority in government throughout the first two years of Biden&apos;s administration to try to pass as progressive legislation as possible, the kind that will benefit all Americans. This includes (1) drastically increasing taxes on the wealthiest to fund social programs like health care as a human right, (2) taking a strong stance on climate change by reducing our dependence on fossil fuels by incentivizing the creation of jobs and training programs in the renewable energy sector, and (3) refining American democracy by doing such things as mandating presidents to have to release their tax returns, revitalization the Voting Rights Act, and increasing transparency in and limiting the opportunities for corporate/private campaign contributions.
Secondly, we hope that people recognize that while the pro-Trump supporters who stormed the capitol certainly exhibited poor behavior for a deplorable cause, the true coup that day was the one carried out by the nearly 10 Republican Senators and 139 Republican House of Representatives members who did not vote to certify the free and fair 2020 U.S. general election results. The true, long lasting stain on American democracy isn&apos;t just Trump or his manipulated supporters, but the morally and intellectually bankrupt policies and practices of the Republican party that got us to where we are today.
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wednesday, January 6th, 2021 was a red letter day in American history. We woke up to surprising news of Democrats winning both run-off Senate seats in Georgia, tipping the balance of power in the Senate. We went to bed to even more surprising news of pro-Trump supporters invading the U.S. capital over factually, empirically, objectively false information.</p><p>We'll offer our takes on both momentous events.</p><p>Firstly, we hope that Democrats use their majority in government throughout the first two years of Biden's administration to try to pass as progressive legislation as possible, the kind that will benefit all Americans. This includes (1) drastically increasing taxes on the wealthiest to fund social programs like health care as a human right, (2) taking a strong stance on climate change by reducing our dependence on fossil fuels by incentivizing the creation of jobs and training programs in the renewable energy sector, and (3) refining American democracy by doing such things as mandating presidents to have to release their tax returns, revitalization the Voting Rights Act, and increasing transparency in and limiting the opportunities for corporate/private campaign contributions.</p><p>Secondly, we hope that people recognize that while the pro-Trump supporters who stormed the capitol certainly exhibited poor behavior for a deplorable cause, the true coup that day was the one carried out by the nearly 10 Republican Senators and 139 Republican House of Representatives members who did not vote to certify the free and fair 2020 U.S. general election results. The true, long lasting stain on American democracy isn't just Trump or his manipulated supporters, but the morally and intellectually bankrupt policies and practices of the Republican party that got us to where we are today.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-126-americas-red-letter-day-january-6th-2021]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">b8283246-2f49-4d66-a2b8-4f630dea3997</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2021 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/88a9b023-9374-4b7a-8df5-1b5e21f0b4d3/episode-126.mp3" length="37673028" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>57:00</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>126</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>Wednesday, January 6th, 2021 was a red letter day in American history. We woke up to surprising news of Democrats winning both run-off Senate seats in Georgia, tipping the balance of power in the Senate. We went to bed to even more surprising news of pro-Trump supporters invading the U.S. capital over factually, empirically, objectively false information.
We&apos;ll offer our takes on both momentous events.
Firstly, we hope that Democrats use their majority in government throughout the first two years of Biden&apos;s administration to try to pass as progressive legislation as possible, the kind that will benefit all Americans. This includes (1) drastically increasing taxes on the wealthiest to fund social programs like health care as a human right, (2) taking a strong stance on climate change by reducing our dependence on fossil fuels by incentivizing the creation of jobs and training programs in the renewable energy sector, and (3) refining American democracy by doing such things as mandating presidents to have to release their tax returns, revitalization the Voting Rights Act, and increasing transparency in and limiting the opportunities for corporate/private campaign contributions.
Secondly, we hope that people recognize that while the pro-Trump supporters who stormed the capitol certainly exhibited poor behavior for a deplorable cause, the true coup that day was the one carried out by the nearly 10 Republican Senators and 139 Republican House of Representatives members who did not vote to certify the free and fair 2020 U.S. general election results. The true, long lasting stain on American democracy isn&apos;t just Trump or his manipulated supporters, but the morally and intellectually bankrupt policies and practices of the Republican party that got us to where we are today.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 125: Rochester Police Accountability Board and Draft Police Reforms</title><itunes:title>Episode 125: Rochester Police Accountability Board and Draft Police Reforms</itunes:title><description>In response to the Black Lives Matter movement, systemic racism, unjust policing, and Governor Cuomo&apos;s Executive Order 203, cities around New York State are pulling together teams to examine how policing can change.  
In Rochester, the Police Accountability Board is helping spearhead this change process. As part of a larger working group, they released a draft plan as to how policing should change in Rochester. 
You can see the draft plan--and share your own ideas for change--here: https://www.cityofrochester.gov/pab/answers/.
In this episode we some of the proposed changes. Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the Black Lives Matter movement, systemic racism, unjust policing, and Governor Cuomo's Executive Order 203, cities around New York State are pulling together teams to examine how policing can change.  </p><p>In Rochester, the Police Accountability Board is helping spearhead this change process. As part of a larger working group, they released a draft plan as to how policing should change in Rochester. </p><p>You can see the draft plan--and share your own ideas for change--here: https://www.cityofrochester.gov/pab/answers/.</p><p>In this episode we some of the proposed changes. Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-125-rochester-police-accountability-board-and-draft-police-reforms]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">06df29a3-5532-4c88-a33c-f883b1b3c8fc</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2021 16:45:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/dc48a574-3280-43fe-b1bc-d624dc41060a/episode-125.mp3" length="39084084" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>57:00</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>125</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In response to the Black Lives Matter movement, systemic racism, unjust policing, and Governor Cuomo&apos;s Executive Order 203, cities around New York State are pulling together teams to examine how policing can change.  
In Rochester, the Police Accountability Board is helping spearhead this change process. As part of a larger working group, they released a draft plan as to how policing should change in Rochester. 
You can see the draft plan--and share your own ideas for change--here: https://www.cityofrochester.gov/pab/answers/.
In this episode we some of the proposed changes. Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 124: Productive Civic Engagement with Dr. Kevin Meuwissen</title><itunes:title>Episode 124: Productive Civic Engagement with Dr. Kevin Meuwissen</itunes:title><description>Dr. Kevin Meuwissen, associate professor and coordinator of the social studies education program at the University of Rochester&apos;s Warner School of Education joins us for a conversation on civic engagement. How do youth come to understand politics? Are all forms of political engagement good, or can political engagement also be destructive? What is being politically engaged good for, anyway?
In the pantheon of the English language, the phrase “civic engagement” doesn’t win awards for being exciting. Despite literally being about “engagement,” there aren&apos;t many things less, well, engaging. What’s invoked are cold marble statues of long-dead Greek men. Idols to the founders of civics to which Western Civilization is happy to pay homage in words more than deeds.
But perhaps beauty is in the eye of the beholder, not beholden to an object itself. Maybe what rescues “civic engagement” from this pessimistic purgatory is not a corporate rebranding or linguistic wordsmithing, but a re-realization that civic engagement means more than tax bills, voter IDs, and “Don’t tread on me” flags.
Civic engagement is also about participating in the defining of society and what it means to live in said society. It’s about building the complex web of connections and articulations of power that come to manifest as our reality. Sound complex? To boil it down to its rudest element, both your actions and inaction have power, and in complex alchemical ways all of our actions and inaction come to define our society.
We’re here to talk about civic engagement, dust off those old, cold statues and, most importantly, build some new ones along the way.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Kevin Meuwissen, associate professor and coordinator of the social studies education program at the University of Rochester's Warner School of Education joins us for a conversation on civic engagement. How do youth come to understand politics? Are all forms of political engagement good, or can political engagement also be destructive? What is being politically engaged good for, anyway?</p><p>In the pantheon of the English language, the phrase “civic engagement” doesn’t win awards for being exciting. Despite literally being about “engagement,” there aren't many things less, well, engaging. What’s invoked are cold marble statues of long-dead Greek men. Idols to the founders of civics to which Western Civilization is happy to pay homage in words more than deeds.</p><p>But perhaps beauty is in the eye of the beholder, not beholden to an object itself. Maybe what rescues “civic engagement” from this pessimistic purgatory is not a corporate rebranding or linguistic wordsmithing, but a re-realization that civic engagement means more than tax bills, voter IDs, and “Don’t tread on me” flags.</p><p>Civic engagement is also about participating in the defining of society and what it means to live in said society. It’s about building the complex web of connections and articulations of power that come to manifest as our reality. Sound complex? To boil it down to its rudest element, both your actions and inaction have power, and in complex alchemical ways all of our actions and inaction come to define our society.</p><p>We’re here to talk about civic engagement, dust off those old, cold statues and, most importantly, build some new ones along the way.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-124-productive-civic-engagement-with-dr-kevin-meuwissen]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">c8fc0392-9bcf-4e77-8bf1-7245a10063f4</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/8e2ab5d4-e233-4406-aad0-1be86b292e28/6f-5fcu5hij1sxhnke1mtsxt.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 15:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/f8978b47-dc70-4d66-b372-e16ce07affb4/episode-124.mp3" length="37256148" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>57:04</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>124</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>Dr. Kevin Meuwissen, associate professor and coordinator of the social studies education program at the University of Rochester&apos;s Warner School of Education joins us for a conversation on civic engagement. How do youth come to understand politics? Are all forms of political engagement good, or can political engagement also be destructive? What is being politically engaged good for, anyway?
In the pantheon of the English language, the phrase “civic engagement” doesn’t win awards for being exciting. Despite literally being about “engagement,” there aren&apos;t many things less, well, engaging. What’s invoked are cold marble statues of long-dead Greek men. Idols to the founders of civics to which Western Civilization is happy to pay homage in words more than deeds.
But perhaps beauty is in the eye of the beholder, not beholden to an object itself. Maybe what rescues “civic engagement” from this pessimistic purgatory is not a corporate rebranding or linguistic wordsmithing, but a re-realization that civic engagement means more than tax bills, voter IDs, and “Don’t tread on me” flags.
Civic engagement is also about participating in the defining of society and what it means to live in said society. It’s about building the complex web of connections and articulations of power that come to manifest as our reality. Sound complex? To boil it down to its rudest element, both your actions and inaction have power, and in complex alchemical ways all of our actions and inaction come to define our society.
We’re here to talk about civic engagement, dust off those old, cold statues and, most importantly, build some new ones along the way.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 123: Georgia Senate Runoff Elections</title><itunes:title>Episode 123: Georgia Senate Runoff Elections</itunes:title><description>We cover the Georgia Senate runoff elections of Jon Ossoff (D) v. incumbent David Purdue (R) and Raphael Warnock (D) v. incumbent Kelly Loeffler (R).
The incumbent Republicans are two of the most conservative in the country. Both have refused to acknowledge that Trump lost the presidential election, thereby refusing the acknowledge their own constituents&apos; votes. Both have refused to work on passing another round of federal support for the millions of people and thousands of governments and businesses struggling during the pandemic. Both dumped stock for millions of dollars at the start of the year, after learning in closed door sessions how much the pandemic would influence society, before the American public was made aware.
In short, Purdue and Loeffler are not allies of American democracy or civil society.
We use this content to analyze how Democratic challengers Ossoff and Warnock lay out their vision. We argue Democrats are best when they boldly go after progressive economic policies (e.g. health care as a human right, big government that supports people). While there were moments when both Ossoff and Warnock went there, oftentimes Democratic rhetoric is playing defensive against Republican narratives. Democrats should stop playing defensive when Republicans habitually and anti-democratically lie about them. Democrats should show voters why their vision for society is better than the one Republicans claim to provide.
This vision MUST take into account material needs, not just supposed moral superiority.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We cover the Georgia Senate runoff elections of Jon Ossoff (D) v. incumbent David Purdue (R) and Raphael Warnock (D) v. incumbent Kelly Loeffler (R).</p><p>The incumbent Republicans are two of the most conservative in the country. Both have refused to acknowledge that Trump lost the presidential election, thereby refusing the acknowledge their own constituents' votes. Both have refused to work on passing another round of federal support for the millions of people and thousands of governments and businesses struggling during the pandemic. Both dumped stock for millions of dollars at the start of the year, after learning in closed door sessions how much the pandemic would influence society, before the American public was made aware.</p><p>In short, Purdue and Loeffler are not allies of American democracy or civil society.</p><p>We use this content to analyze how Democratic challengers Ossoff and Warnock lay out their vision. We argue Democrats are best when they boldly go after progressive economic policies (e.g. health care as a human right, big government that supports people). While there were moments when both Ossoff and Warnock went there, oftentimes Democratic rhetoric is playing defensive against Republican narratives. Democrats should stop playing defensive when Republicans habitually and anti-democratically lie about them. Democrats should show voters why their vision for society is better than the one Republicans claim to provide.</p><p>This vision MUST take into account material needs, not just supposed moral superiority.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-123-georgia-senate-runoff-elections]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">a7743271-6dc2-4f2c-b9cd-3053c0a4b80e</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/39ab7268-f2f7-41e1-9ec8-a8f2fb28d88e/episode-123.mp3" length="37875060" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>57:00</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>123</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We cover the Georgia Senate runoff elections of Jon Ossoff (D) v. incumbent David Purdue (R) and Raphael Warnock (D) v. incumbent Kelly Loeffler (R).
The incumbent Republicans are two of the most conservative in the country. Both have refused to acknowledge that Trump lost the presidential election, thereby refusing the acknowledge their own constituents&apos; votes. Both have refused to work on passing another round of federal support for the millions of people and thousands of governments and businesses struggling during the pandemic. Both dumped stock for millions of dollars at the start of the year, after learning in closed door sessions how much the pandemic would influence society, before the American public was made aware.
In short, Purdue and Loeffler are not allies of American democracy or civil society.
We use this content to analyze how Democratic challengers Ossoff and Warnock lay out their vision. We argue Democrats are best when they boldly go after progressive economic policies (e.g. health care as a human right, big government that supports people). While there were moments when both Ossoff and Warnock went there, oftentimes Democratic rhetoric is playing defensive against Republican narratives. Democrats should stop playing defensive when Republicans habitually and anti-democratically lie about them. Democrats should show voters why their vision for society is better than the one Republicans claim to provide.
This vision MUST take into account material needs, not just supposed moral superiority.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 122: President-elect Joe Biden&apos;s Economic Team</title><itunes:title>Episode 122: President-elect Joe Biden&apos;s Economic Team</itunes:title><description>We cover President-elect Joe Biden&apos;s economic team. This week he announced his nominees for Treasury Secretary, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, among other positions.
On the one hand, it&apos;s encouraging to hear Biden and these nominees speak about the importance of fixing America&apos;s structural inequalities, such as wage growth, the pay gap, and immediate pandemic-related relief. The Trump administration--and the Republican party at large--certainly doesn&apos;t take up these issues with any seriousness.
On the other hand, it&apos;s disappointing to hear Biden and these nominees speak with such feverishness about the link between work and human dignity. A few spoke as if a job is the only thing that offers someone meaning in life. The reality, of course, is that as a human being you inherently have dignity, and you don&apos;t need to let the capitalistic labor market define your dignity based on what job you have. Also, where is the dignity in work for the tens of millions of Americans who work dead-end, low wage, low benefit jobs, for no fault of their own?
Our worry for a Biden presidency--coming out of a Trump presidency--is that success for Biden and his team will be measured by how &quot;nice&quot; and &quot;empathetic&quot; they are. We don&apos;t just need &quot;Uncle Joe&quot; to &quot;bring us together&quot; and &quot;listen to use&quot; and to &quot;care&quot; about &quot;all Americans.&quot; We need the executive and legislative branches of our government to actually do their jobs in passing and enforcing policies and legislation that fundamentally and materially make our lives better and less reliant on the vicissitudes of &quot;the market.&quot;
Raising taxes on the wealthy, expanding the social safety net, providing health care as a human right would be good places to start.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We cover President-elect Joe Biden's economic team. This week he announced his nominees for Treasury Secretary, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, among other positions.</p><p>On the one hand, it's encouraging to hear Biden and these nominees speak about the importance of fixing America's structural inequalities, such as wage growth, the pay gap, and immediate pandemic-related relief. The Trump administration--and the Republican party at large--certainly doesn't take up these issues with any seriousness.</p><p>On the other hand, it's disappointing to hear Biden and these nominees speak with such feverishness about the link between work and human dignity. A few spoke as if a job is the only thing that offers someone meaning in life. The reality, of course, is that as a human being you inherently have dignity, and you don't need to let the capitalistic labor market define your dignity based on what job you have. Also, where is the dignity in work for the tens of millions of Americans who work dead-end, low wage, low benefit jobs, for no fault of their own?</p><p>Our worry for a Biden presidency--coming out of a Trump presidency--is that success for Biden and his team will be measured by how "nice" and "empathetic" they are. We don't just need "Uncle Joe" to "bring us together" and "listen to use" and to "care" about "all Americans." We need the executive and legislative branches of our government to actually do their jobs in passing and enforcing policies and legislation that fundamentally and materially make our lives better and less reliant on the vicissitudes of "the market."</p><p>Raising taxes on the wealthy, expanding the social safety net, providing health care as a human right would be good places to start.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-122-president-elect-joe-bidens-economic-team]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">83143d84-3aab-4189-a461-6feb045d2d6f</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2020 11:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/dc92dfbc-81ec-4160-a5e0-87d7342c9c71/episode-122.mp3" length="37223856" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:57</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>122</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We cover President-elect Joe Biden&apos;s economic team. This week he announced his nominees for Treasury Secretary, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, among other positions.
On the one hand, it&apos;s encouraging to hear Biden and these nominees speak about the importance of fixing America&apos;s structural inequalities, such as wage growth, the pay gap, and immediate pandemic-related relief. The Trump administration--and the Republican party at large--certainly doesn&apos;t take up these issues with any seriousness.
On the other hand, it&apos;s disappointing to hear Biden and these nominees speak with such feverishness about the link between work and human dignity. A few spoke as if a job is the only thing that offers someone meaning in life. The reality, of course, is that as a human being you inherently have dignity, and you don&apos;t need to let the capitalistic labor market define your dignity based on what job you have. Also, where is the dignity in work for the tens of millions of Americans who work dead-end, low wage, low benefit jobs, for no fault of their own?
Our worry for a Biden presidency--coming out of a Trump presidency--is that success for Biden and his team will be measured by how &quot;nice&quot; and &quot;empathetic&quot; they are. We don&apos;t just need &quot;Uncle Joe&quot; to &quot;bring us together&quot; and &quot;listen to use&quot; and to &quot;care&quot; about &quot;all Americans.&quot; We need the executive and legislative branches of our government to actually do their jobs in passing and enforcing policies and legislation that fundamentally and materially make our lives better and less reliant on the vicissitudes of &quot;the market.&quot;
Raising taxes on the wealthy, expanding the social safety net, providing health care as a human right would be good places to start.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 121: Local Election Results and American Academy of Arts &amp; Sciences Report on Democratc Reforms</title><itunes:title>Episode 121: Local Election Results and American Academy of Arts &amp; Sciences Report on Democratc Reforms</itunes:title><description>We cover three topics this episode: the latest global, national, and local COVID-19 numbers, (2) who won local races in the 2020 General Election, (3) and a report by the American Academy of Arts &amp;amp; Sciences on reinventing American democracy for the 21st century: https://www.amacad.org/ourcommonpurpose/reporthttps://www.amacad.org/ourcommonpurpose/report?fbclid=IwAR3Zp0qyDeNflIlZijrpfGaV_a1mwIKXbV2ZzBbiHzgMxH0glSx8ZTuUmyE (https://www.amacad.org/.../www.../ourcommonpurpose/report)
The AAAS report outlines 31 reforms that are needed to strengthen America&apos;s constitutional democracy. Many Americans have become distrustful of government, arguably for good reason (e.g. a politics that has been increasingly influenced by corporate interests, conservative rhetoric that dogmatically espouses government has a problem, an increasingly sclerotic government that fails to respond to the great challenges of our time, etc.). These are bipartisan--nonpartisan--criticisms.
The AAAS report suggests such reforms as (1) enlarging the House of Representatives, (2) introducing ranked choice voting, (3) implementing independent redistricting commissions, and many more.
Despite the profound polarization and sclerosis of our society and politics, we think we must take up many of these reforms for America to continue and, dare we say, remain/become Great.
All politics is local. We all have the power to organize ourselves and be the change we wish to see in the world.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We cover three topics this episode: the latest global, national, and local COVID-19 numbers, (2) who won local races in the 2020 General Election, (3) and a report by the American Academy of Arts &amp; Sciences on reinventing American democracy for the 21st century: <a href="https://www.amacad.org/ourcommonpurpose/reporthttps://www.amacad.org/ourcommonpurpose/report?fbclid=IwAR3Zp0qyDeNflIlZijrpfGaV_a1mwIKXbV2ZzBbiHzgMxH0glSx8ZTuUmyE" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.amacad.org/.../www.../ourcommonpurpose/report</a></p><p>The AAAS report outlines 31 reforms that are needed to strengthen America's constitutional democracy. Many Americans have become distrustful of government, arguably for good reason (e.g. a politics that has been increasingly influenced by corporate interests, conservative rhetoric that dogmatically espouses government has a problem, an increasingly sclerotic government that fails to respond to the great challenges of our time, etc.). These are bipartisan--nonpartisan--criticisms.</p><p>The AAAS report suggests such reforms as (1) enlarging the House of Representatives, (2) introducing ranked choice voting, (3) implementing independent redistricting commissions, and many more.</p><p>Despite the profound polarization and sclerosis of our society and politics, we think we must take up many of these reforms for America to continue and, dare we say, remain/become Great.</p><p>All politics is local. We all have the power to organize ourselves and be the change we wish to see in the world.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-121-local-election-results-and-american-academy-of-arts-sciences-report-on-democratc-reforms]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">a339b744-13c7-4c63-8f38-009926425e4d</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/9575be41-afca-4262-8f37-e5944afade70/episode-121.mp3" length="40872849" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:15</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>121</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We cover three topics this episode: the latest global, national, and local COVID-19 numbers, (2) who won local races in the 2020 General Election, (3) and a report by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences on reinventing American democracy for the 21st century: https://www.amacad.org/ourcommonpurpose/reporthttps://www.amacad.org/ourcommonpurpose/report?fbclid=IwAR3Zp0qyDeNflIlZijrpfGaV_a1mwIKXbV2ZzBbiHzgMxH0glSx8ZTuUmyE (https://www.amacad.org/.../www.../ourcommonpurpose/report)
The AAAS report outlines 31 reforms that are needed to strengthen America&apos;s constitutional democracy. Many Americans have become distrustful of government, arguably for good reason (e.g. a politics that has been increasingly influenced by corporate interests, conservative rhetoric that dogmatically espouses government has a problem, an increasingly sclerotic government that fails to respond to the great challenges of our time, etc.). These are bipartisan--nonpartisan--criticisms.
The AAAS report suggests such reforms as (1) enlarging the House of Representatives, (2) introducing ranked choice voting, (3) implementing independent redistricting commissions, and many more.
Despite the profound polarization and sclerosis of our society and politics, we think we must take up many of these reforms for America to continue and, dare we say, remain/become Great.
All politics is local. We all have the power to organize ourselves and be the change we wish to see in the world.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 120: Where We Stand - COVID-19 Globally, Nationally, and Locally</title><itunes:title>Episode 120: Where We Stand - COVID-19 Globally, Nationally, and Locally</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss where we stand when it comes to COVID-19. We go in depth about global, national, and local COVID-19 figures.
Globally, the U.S. has 4% of the world&apos;s population while having 20% of the world&apos;s confirmed cases of COVID-19 and COVID-19 deaths. Barring India and Brazil, which have the second and third most confirmed cases of COVID-19, the U.S. has more COVID-19 cases than the next 10 countries combined, despite having nearly 1/3 of their combined populations. The figures are tragic and astounding.


Nationally, COVID-19 will be the third leading cause of death this year, behind only cancer and heart disease.


Locally, Monroe County is no longer in the eye of the storm: we are in the storm itself with cases having precipitously risen. In just three days this week there were more confirmed COVID-19 cases than there were in the entire month of September. Now, more than 1.35% of Monroe County residents either have or have had COVID-19.


None of this was or needs to be inevitable. By practicing relatively easy to do and common sense practices, such as physical distancing and universal mask wearing, we can flatten the curve until a more permanent solution, like a vaccine, arrives. The best time to stop COVID-19 was months ago, the second best time is now.


Thank you for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss where we stand when it comes to COVID-19. We go in depth about global, national, and local COVID-19 figures.</p><p>Globally, the U.S. has 4% of the world's population while having 20% of the world's confirmed cases of COVID-19 and COVID-19 deaths. Barring India and Brazil, which have the second and third most confirmed cases of COVID-19, the U.S. has more COVID-19 cases than the next 10 countries combined, despite having nearly 1/3 of their combined populations. The figures are tragic and astounding.</p><p><br></p><p>Nationally, COVID-19 will be the third leading cause of death this year, behind only cancer and heart disease.</p><p><br></p><p>Locally, Monroe County is no longer in the eye of the storm: we are in the storm itself with cases having precipitously risen. In just three days this week there were more confirmed COVID-19 cases than there were in the entire month of September. Now, more than 1.35% of Monroe County residents either have or have had COVID-19.</p><p><br></p><p>None of this was or needs to be inevitable. By practicing relatively easy to do and common sense practices, such as physical distancing and universal mask wearing, we can flatten the curve until a more permanent solution, like a vaccine, arrives. The best time to stop COVID-19 was months ago, the second best time is now.</p><p><br></p><p>Thank you for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-120-where-we-stand-covid-19-globally-nationally-and-locally]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">1a189fe5-df96-47a1-92bd-df217ce034e4</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/f2fbb79d-944d-4b8d-9ec5-9ec0eda25340/episode-120.mp3" length="40060725" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:34</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>120</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss where we stand when it comes to COVID-19. We go in depth about global, national, and local COVID-19 figures.
Globally, the U.S. has 4% of the world&apos;s population while having 20% of the world&apos;s confirmed cases of COVID-19 and COVID-19 deaths. Barring India and Brazil, which have the second and third most confirmed cases of COVID-19, the U.S. has more COVID-19 cases than the next 10 countries combined, despite having nearly 1/3 of their combined populations. The figures are tragic and astounding.


Nationally, COVID-19 will be the third leading cause of death this year, behind only cancer and heart disease.


Locally, Monroe County is no longer in the eye of the storm: we are in the storm itself with cases having precipitously risen. In just three days this week there were more confirmed COVID-19 cases than there were in the entire month of September. Now, more than 1.35% of Monroe County residents either have or have had COVID-19.


None of this was or needs to be inevitable. By practicing relatively easy to do and common sense practices, such as physical distancing and universal mask wearing, we can flatten the curve until a more permanent solution, like a vaccine, arrives. The best time to stop COVID-19 was months ago, the second best time is now.


Thank you for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 119: 2020 General Election Results - Democrats Must be More Progressive</title><itunes:title>Episode 119: 2020 General Election Results - Democrats Must be More Progressive</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss the 2020 General Election results. Although Democrats defeated Trump, we argue the victory is bitter sweet. Democrats did not win their anticipated &quot;blue wave.&quot; Instead, they LOST seats in the House, are likely to not take the Senate, squeaked out a victory against Trump--an incredibly unpopular and divisive candidate--and flipped NO state legislatures. Were it not for the defeat of Trump, it would have been an absolute disaster for Democrats. Although winning the presidency, Biden has effectively been denied a chance to govern. For instance, Mitch McConnell&apos;s Senate and the conservative Supreme Court will basically strike down or block anything Biden does. Unless the 2022 mid-terms give Democrats the power they need to govern, the Biden presidency will be four years of partisan gridlock, thanks to Republican obstruction. Who is to blame? Well, of course Republicans for their senseless pursuit of power at the expense of material and social benefits for the American people. But Democrats are to blame, too. Biden was supposed to be the most &quot;electable&quot; candidate. If so, why did Democrats squeak out a victory against Trump, and essentially get no down ballot victories? We argue it&apos;s because Democrats have abandoned progressive material politics that seek to benefit everyday people&apos;s lives. Democrats MUST take on more progressive politics, like universal health care, universal basic income, and housing as a human right, or else they will continue to become what the Republican party once was, and the Republican party will erode into a free market fascist cult.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss the 2020 General Election results. Although Democrats defeated Trump, we argue the victory is bitter sweet. Democrats did not win their anticipated "blue wave." Instead, they LOST seats in the House, are likely to not take the Senate, squeaked out a victory against Trump--an incredibly unpopular and divisive candidate--and flipped NO state legislatures. Were it not for the defeat of Trump, it would have been an absolute disaster for Democrats. Although winning the presidency, Biden has effectively been denied a chance to govern. For instance, Mitch McConnell's Senate and the conservative Supreme Court will basically strike down or block anything Biden does. Unless the 2022 mid-terms give Democrats the power they need to govern, the Biden presidency will be four years of partisan gridlock, thanks to Republican obstruction. Who is to blame? Well, of course Republicans for their senseless pursuit of power at the expense of material and social benefits for the American people. But Democrats are to blame, too. Biden was supposed to be the most "electable" candidate. If so, why did Democrats squeak out a victory against Trump, and essentially get no down ballot victories? We argue it's because Democrats have abandoned progressive material politics that seek to benefit everyday people's lives. Democrats MUST take on more progressive politics, like universal health care, universal basic income, and housing as a human right, or else they will continue to become what the Republican party once was, and the Republican party will erode into a free market fascist cult.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-119-2020-general-election-results-democrats-must-be-more-progressive]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">636c66da-0fac-48e0-b02f-36bacd0d82e9</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/cb573e48-313e-4981-a186-da3aebda3e11/episode-119.mp3" length="41992836" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:53</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>119</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss the 2020 General Election results. Although Democrats defeated Trump, we argue the victory is bitter sweet. Democrats did not win their anticipated &quot;blue wave.&quot; Instead, they LOST seats in the House, are likely to not take the Senate, squeaked out a victory against Trump--an incredibly unpopular and divisive candidate--and flipped NO state legislatures. Were it not for the defeat of Trump, it would have been an absolute disaster for Democrats. Although winning the presidency, Biden has effectively been denied a chance to govern. For instance, Mitch McConnell&apos;s Senate and the conservative Supreme Court will basically strike down or block anything Biden does. Unless the 2022 mid-terms give Democrats the power they need to govern, the Biden presidency will be four years of partisan gridlock, thanks to Republican obstruction. Who is to blame? Well, of course Republicans for their senseless pursuit of power at the expense of material and social benefits for the American people. But Democrats are to blame, too. Biden was supposed to be the most &quot;electable&quot; candidate. If so, why did Democrats squeak out a victory against Trump, and essentially get no down ballot victories? We argue it&apos;s because Democrats have abandoned progressive material politics that seek to benefit everyday people&apos;s lives. Democrats MUST take on more progressive politics, like universal health care, universal basic income, and housing as a human right, or else they will continue to become what the Republican party once was, and the Republican party will erode into a free market fascist cult.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 118: Records Set for COVID-19 and Early Voter Turnout</title><itunes:title>Episode 118: Records Set for COVID-19 and Early Voter Turnout</itunes:title><description>Happy Halloween. 
In the closing week of the 2020 general election we discuss records set for the number of COVID-19 cases per day (which have hit records locally and nationally) and early voter turnout (which have also hit records locally and nationally). 
So far COVID-19 does not seem to have suppressed the vote. Will efforts to suppress the vote, or at least contest the results of the election, by Trump and the Republican Party to succeed? 
Make sure to make your voice heard by voting, and help ensure your safety and the safety of others by wearing a mask.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Halloween. </p><p>In the closing week of the 2020 general election we discuss records set for the number of COVID-19 cases per day (which have hit records locally and nationally) and early voter turnout (which have also hit records locally and nationally). </p><p>So far COVID-19 does not seem to have suppressed the vote. Will efforts to suppress the vote, or at least contest the results of the election, by Trump and the Republican Party to succeed? </p><p>Make sure to make your voice heard by voting, and help ensure your safety and the safety of others by wearing a mask.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-118-records-set-for-covid-19-and-early-voter-turnout]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">02ffabf7-b266-4d41-a0db-c6f396c24a07</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 02:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/e31a27f7-7f32-4ab6-828d-05e60ba5be0e/episode-118.mp3" length="42160117" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>57:14</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>118</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>Happy Halloween. 
In the closing week of the 2020 general election we discuss records set for the number of COVID-19 cases per day (which have hit records locally and nationally) and early voter turnout (which have also hit records locally and nationally). 
So far COVID-19 does not seem to have suppressed the vote. Will efforts to suppress the vote, or at least contest the results of the election, by Trump and the Republican Party to succeed? 
Make sure to make your voice heard by voting, and help ensure your safety and the safety of others by wearing a mask.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 117: Lawsuits Against Big Business - Google and Purdue Pharma</title><itunes:title>Episode 117: Lawsuits Against Big Business - Google and Purdue Pharma</itunes:title><description>We discuss two recent legal developments against big business: (1) Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, pleads guilty to over $8 billion in federal charges for their role in manufacturing America&apos;s opioid crisis and (2) Google is sued by the Justice Department in the largest antitrust case in decades for alleged market dominance and stifling competition. We also cover the latest COVID-19 figures and the start of early voting in NYS.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discuss two recent legal developments against big business: (1) Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, pleads guilty to over $8 billion in federal charges for their role in manufacturing America's opioid crisis and (2) Google is sued by the Justice Department in the largest antitrust case in decades for alleged market dominance and stifling competition. We also cover the latest COVID-19 figures and the start of early voting in NYS.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-117-lawsuits-against-big-business-google-and-purdue-pharma]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">6ef3eda8-9b6f-4df3-84c7-824f471c59f8</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:15:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/0da2fad7-415b-44d6-b620-f35ab30c7d2d/episode-117.mp3" length="41177202" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:46</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>117</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>We discuss two recent legal developments against big business: (1) Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, pleads guilty to over $8 billion in federal charges for their role in manufacturing America&apos;s opioid crisis and (2) Google is sued by the Justice Department in the largest antitrust case in decades for alleged market dominance and stifling competition. We also cover the latest COVID-19 figures and the start of early voting in NYS.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 116: The &quot;Dark Cloud&quot; Over the U.S. Supreme Court</title><itunes:title>Episode 116: The &quot;Dark Cloud&quot; Over the U.S. Supreme Court</itunes:title><description>4:30 - COVID-19 Update 
14:30 - The &quot;Dark Cloud&quot; Over the U.S. Supreme Court 
44:52 - Voting Update and Early Voting Dates and Locations 
In this episode we discuss the &quot;dark cloud&quot; hanging over judge Amy Coney Barrett&apos;s Supreme Court nomination hearings. We play a clip of Senator Sheldon Whitehouse who warns against powerful &quot;dark money&quot; groups who have been pumping money into the Supreme Court for decades, encouraging the court&apos;s conservative majority to decide cases against the interests of most Americans. 
Popular coverage about the Supreme Court tends to revolve around hot-button social issues, such as abortion (Roe v. Wade) or gay marriage (Obergeffel v. Hodges). While important issues, and while the outcomes of such cases have been favorable towards social justice, the Court has presided over an enormous amount of cases over the past several decades that have promoted the interests of corporations and the wealthy against the interests of most Americans. 
For example: 
2010 - Citizens United v. FEC - unlimited corporate political donations is a form of free speech 
2013 - Shelby County v. Holder - states with historically racist or restrictive voting laws are free from federal oversight on new voting laws they create 
2015 - Michigan v. EPA - restricts ability of EPA to enforce regulations that make the appearance of costing corporations money 
2018 - Janus v. AFSCME - restricts the ability of unions to collect dues 
2019 - Rucho v. Common Cause - prevents the federal government from combating gerrymandering 
ALL of these cases were decided 5-4 by the Supreme Court&apos;s conservative majority, a majority about to expand to 6-3 with the suspected confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett. 
President Trump, a president elected by a minority of the population, has effectively appointed a third of ALL federal judges and a third of ALL the Supreme Court justices. These judges and justices serve for life, and their decisions affect the lives of us all.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4:30 - COVID-19 Update </p><p>14:30 - The "Dark Cloud" Over the U.S. Supreme Court </p><p>44:52 - Voting Update and Early Voting Dates and Locations </p><p>In this episode we discuss the "dark cloud" hanging over judge Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination hearings. We play a clip of Senator Sheldon Whitehouse who warns against powerful "dark money" groups who have been pumping money into the Supreme Court for decades, encouraging the court's conservative majority to decide cases against the interests of most Americans. </p><p>Popular coverage about the Supreme Court tends to revolve around hot-button social issues, such as abortion (Roe v. Wade) or gay marriage (Obergeffel v. Hodges). While important issues, and while the outcomes of such cases have been favorable towards social justice, the Court has presided over an enormous amount of cases over the past several decades that have promoted the interests of corporations and the wealthy against the interests of most Americans. </p><p>For example: </p><ul><li>2010 - Citizens United v. FEC - unlimited corporate political donations is a form of free speech </li><li>2013 - Shelby County v. Holder - states with historically racist or restrictive voting laws are free from federal oversight on new voting laws they create </li><li>2015 - Michigan v. EPA - restricts ability of EPA to enforce regulations that make the appearance of costing corporations money </li><li>2018 - Janus v. AFSCME - restricts the ability of unions to collect dues </li><li>2019 - Rucho v. Common Cause - prevents the federal government from combating gerrymandering </li></ul><p>ALL of these cases were decided 5-4 by the Supreme Court's conservative majority, a majority about to expand to 6-3 with the suspected confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett. </p><p>President Trump, a president elected by a minority of the population, has effectively appointed a third of ALL federal judges and a third of ALL the Supreme Court justices. These judges and justices serve for life, and their decisions affect the lives of us all.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-116-the-dark-cloud-over-the-u-s-supreme-court]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">b313c04f-4b1d-4041-bcfb-fd5a933c237d</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/712b463c-c3a4-49d5-bfa2-69f16a31e07a/episode-115.mp3" length="41037895" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:03</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>116</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>4:30 - COVID-19 Update 
14:30 - The &quot;Dark Cloud&quot; Over the U.S. Supreme Court 
44:52 - Voting Update and Early Voting Dates and Locations 
In this episode we discuss the &quot;dark cloud&quot; hanging over judge Amy Coney Barrett&apos;s Supreme Court nomination hearings. We play a clip of Senator Sheldon Whitehouse who warns against powerful &quot;dark money&quot; groups who have been pumping money into the Supreme Court for decades, encouraging the court&apos;s conservative majority to decide cases against the interests of most Americans. 
Popular coverage about the Supreme Court tends to revolve around hot-button social issues, such as abortion (Roe v. Wade) or gay marriage (Obergeffel v. Hodges). While important issues, and while the outcomes of such cases have been favorable towards social justice, the Court has presided over an enormous amount of cases over the past several decades that have promoted the interests of corporations and the wealthy against the interests of most Americans. 
For example: 
2010 - Citizens United v. FEC - unlimited corporate political donations is a form of free speech 
2013 - Shelby County v. Holder - states with historically racist or restrictive voting laws are free from federal oversight on new voting laws they create 
2015 - Michigan v. EPA - restricts ability of EPA to enforce regulations that make the appearance of costing corporations money 
2018 - Janus v. AFSCME - restricts the ability of unions to collect dues 
2019 - Rucho v. Common Cause - prevents the federal government from combating gerrymandering 
ALL of these cases were decided 5-4 by the Supreme Court&apos;s conservative majority, a majority about to expand to 6-3 with the suspected confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett. 
President Trump, a president elected by a minority of the population, has effectively appointed a third of ALL federal judges and a third of ALL the Supreme Court justices. These judges and justices serve for life, and their decisions affect the lives of us all.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 115: Federal Reserve&apos;s 2019 Survey of Consumer Finances Highlight&apos;s Continued Inequality</title><itunes:title>Episode 115: Federal Reserve&apos;s 2019 Survey of Consumer Finances Highlight&apos;s Continued Inequality</itunes:title><description>In this episode we feature the recently released 2019 Survey of Consumer Finances from the Federal Reserve. Despite the recent end of the so-called longest economic expansion in modern U.S. history, the data reveals continued widespread inequality, with over 70% of the nation&apos;s total wealth being held by the nation&apos;s top 10% of wealthiest people. These data precede the COVID-19 pandemic, so the reality is likely even worse.
You can read the full report here: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm (https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm)
We also cover the most recent local and national COVID-19 figures, and end with a tribute to David Graeber, author, professor, and activist, who recently passed away.
Thanks for joining us.


</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we feature the recently released 2019 Survey of Consumer Finances from the Federal Reserve. Despite the recent end of the so-called longest economic expansion in modern U.S. history, the data reveals continued widespread inequality, with over 70% of the nation's total wealth being held by the nation's top 10% of wealthiest people. These data precede the COVID-19 pandemic, so the reality is likely even worse.</p><p>You can read the full report here: <a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm</a></p><p>We also cover the most recent local and national COVID-19 figures, and end with a tribute to David Graeber, author, professor, and activist, who recently passed away.</p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p><p><br></p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-115-federal-reserves-2019-survey-of-consumer-finances-highlights-continued-inequality]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">bab6cda3-fb4c-4da0-983b-1f0de3aa0677</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2020 14:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/3d15653c-d6c6-46e9-b253-c736a09c26ad/ep115.mp3" length="48972308" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>50:58</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>115</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we feature the recently released 2019 Survey of Consumer Finances from the Federal Reserve. Despite the recent end of the so-called longest economic expansion in modern U.S. history, the data reveals continued widespread inequality, with over 70% of the nation&apos;s total wealth being held by the nation&apos;s top 10% of wealthiest people. These data precede the COVID-19 pandemic, so the reality is likely even worse.
You can read the full report here: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm (https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/scfindex.htm)
We also cover the most recent local and national COVID-19 figures, and end with a tribute to David Graeber, author, professor, and activist, who recently passed away.
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 114: Political Rhetoric - The 1st 2020 Presidential Debate and Tucker Carlson&apos;s &quot;Non-literal Commentary&quot;</title><itunes:title>Episode 114: Political Rhetoric - The 1st 2020 Presidential Debate and Tucker Carlson&apos;s &quot;Non-literal Commentary&quot;</itunes:title><description>In this episode we cover the 1st 2020 Presidential Debate. We make the case that the &quot;debate&quot; is evidence of how much in crisis our democracy is. Trump was uninterested in engaging in any form of substantive deliberation around any of the pressing issues of our time. Instead, he used the opportunity to peddle disinformation. 
We also cover a recent ruling from a Trump appointed judge on a lawsuit against Fox News&apos; Tucker Carlson. The judge ruled that Tucker Carlson&apos;s show engages in &quot;exaggeration,&quot; &quot;non-literal commentary&quot; and that Tucker Carlson is not &quot;stating actual facts.&quot; The judge concludes that any reasonable viewer of Carlson&apos;s show would view his comments with healthy skepticism. As true as Carlson&apos;s peddling of &quot;non-literal commentary&quot; may be, it is, unfortunately, not true that many of Carlson&apos;s viewers take in his statements with skepticism. What effects does this ruling have? 
Political rhetoric in 2020 is tough indeed.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we cover the 1st 2020 Presidential Debate. We make the case that the "debate" is evidence of how much in crisis our democracy is. Trump was uninterested in engaging in any form of substantive deliberation around any of the pressing issues of our time. Instead, he used the opportunity to peddle disinformation. </p><p>We also cover a recent ruling from a Trump appointed judge on a lawsuit against Fox News' Tucker Carlson. The judge ruled that Tucker Carlson's show engages in "exaggeration," "non-literal commentary" and that Tucker Carlson is not "stating actual facts." The judge concludes that any reasonable viewer of Carlson's show would view his comments with healthy skepticism. As true as Carlson's peddling of "non-literal commentary" may be, it is, unfortunately, not true that many of Carlson's viewers take in his statements with skepticism. What effects does this ruling have? </p><p>Political rhetoric in 2020 is tough indeed.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-114-political-rhetoric-the-1st-2020-presidential-debate-and-tucker-carlsons-non-literal-commentary]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">26fa58f1-f081-4a83-ba85-efa1cacd5a26</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2020 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/7f6e3299-e660-4136-911c-d1f6ca0c49fb/episode-114.mp3" length="42294551" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>55:53</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>114</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we cover the 1st 2020 Presidential Debate. We make the case that the &quot;debate&quot; is evidence of how much in crisis our democracy is. Trump was uninterested in engaging in any form of substantive deliberation around any of the pressing issues of our time. Instead, he used the opportunity to peddle disinformation. 
We also cover a recent ruling from a Trump appointed judge on a lawsuit against Fox News&apos; Tucker Carlson. The judge ruled that Tucker Carlson&apos;s show engages in &quot;exaggeration,&quot; &quot;non-literal commentary&quot; and that Tucker Carlson is not &quot;stating actual facts.&quot; The judge concludes that any reasonable viewer of Carlson&apos;s show would view his comments with healthy skepticism. As true as Carlson&apos;s peddling of &quot;non-literal commentary&quot; may be, it is, unfortunately, not true that many of Carlson&apos;s viewers take in his statements with skepticism. What effects does this ruling have? 
Political rhetoric in 2020 is tough indeed.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 113: RAND Report Highlights Income Stagnation for Most Americans Over Past 50 Years</title><itunes:title>Episode 113: RAND Report Highlights Income Stagnation for Most Americans Over Past 50 Years</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss a recent working paper from the RAND Corporation that highlights how incomes for most Americans have stagnated over the past 50 years. Were income to grow commensurate with overall economic growth, the bottom 90% of income earners in America would collective have 67% higher income, more than $2.5 trillion a year. Most of the income growth over the past 50 years has been concentrated in the hands of the wealthiest. You can read the report here: https://www.youtube.com/redirect?v=u1LOgq3TAHw&amp;amp;event=video_description&amp;amp;redir_token=QUFFLUhqbVN5Sy1fRFJfcnZYU05iYWFZcTMwbVRiZ3hqZ3xBQ3Jtc0tsaWhOYU0tWC1saGZZaURrcENaN0NGUTFWYWhtNTNfaHJfX3BWT3l3QTlzTXp2R3VHZERwT2lfSlk1UUc3M0lyeDd6SnZBSUtWM0J2Z3hudGlnS0VLZTVwVXhseklfcVQ1LVI1RTBMdmRaTjFRa3dCSQ%3D%3D&amp;amp;q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rand.org%2Fpubs%2Fworking_papers%2FWRA516-1.html (https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_pap...). 
While the authors don&apos;t speculate on the causes for this income stagnation and concomitant rising inequality, we offer our own take: neoliberal capitalism. 
At the end, we also discuss the Republican Party&apos;s jaw-dropping and democracy-killing hypocrisy of nominating a Supreme Court Justice with one month until the election, something they refused to do for President Obama nine months before the election in 2016. 
Thanks for joining us.
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss a recent working paper from the RAND Corporation that highlights how incomes for most Americans have stagnated over the past 50 years. Were income to grow commensurate with overall economic growth, the bottom 90% of income earners in America would collective have 67% higher income, more than $2.5 trillion a year. Most of the income growth over the past 50 years has been concentrated in the hands of the wealthiest. You can read the report here: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/redirect?v=u1LOgq3TAHw&amp;event=video_description&amp;redir_token=QUFFLUhqbVN5Sy1fRFJfcnZYU05iYWFZcTMwbVRiZ3hqZ3xBQ3Jtc0tsaWhOYU0tWC1saGZZaURrcENaN0NGUTFWYWhtNTNfaHJfX3BWT3l3QTlzTXp2R3VHZERwT2lfSlk1UUc3M0lyeDd6SnZBSUtWM0J2Z3hudGlnS0VLZTVwVXhseklfcVQ1LVI1RTBMdmRaTjFRa3dCSQ%3D%3D&amp;q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rand.org%2Fpubs%2Fworking_papers%2FWRA516-1.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_pap...</a>. </p><p>While the authors don't speculate on the causes for this income stagnation and concomitant rising inequality, we offer our own take: neoliberal capitalism. </p><p>At the end, we also discuss the Republican Party's jaw-dropping and democracy-killing hypocrisy of nominating a Supreme Court Justice with one month until the election, something they refused to do for President Obama nine months before the election in 2016. </p><p>Thanks for joining us.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-113-rand-report-highlights-income-stagnation-for-most-americans-over-past-50-years]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">799d1e3f-7228-4d1c-871e-1aea3e6faadb</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/5f821d06-baa5-41b3-8f90-e5dcd76cf2d9/episode-113.mp3" length="41911322" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>52:50</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>113</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss a recent working paper from the RAND Corporation that highlights how incomes for most Americans have stagnated over the past 50 years. Were income to grow commensurate with overall economic growth, the bottom 90% of income earners in America would collective have 67% higher income, more than $2.5 trillion a year. Most of the income growth over the past 50 years has been concentrated in the hands of the wealthiest. You can read the report here: https://www.youtube.com/redirect?v=u1LOgq3TAHwandevent=video_descriptionandredir_token=QUFFLUhqbVN5Sy1fRFJfcnZYU05iYWFZcTMwbVRiZ3hqZ3xBQ3Jtc0tsaWhOYU0tWC1saGZZaURrcENaN0NGUTFWYWhtNTNfaHJfX3BWT3l3QTlzTXp2R3VHZERwT2lfSlk1UUc3M0lyeDd6SnZBSUtWM0J2Z3hudGlnS0VLZTVwVXhseklfcVQ1LVI1RTBMdmRaTjFRa3dCSQ%3D%3Dandq=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rand.org%2Fpubs%2Fworking_papers%2FWRA516-1.html (https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_pap...). 
While the authors don&apos;t speculate on the causes for this income stagnation and concomitant rising inequality, we offer our own take: neoliberal capitalism. 
At the end, we also discuss the Republican Party&apos;s jaw-dropping and democracy-killing hypocrisy of nominating a Supreme Court Justice with one month until the election, something they refused to do for President Obama nine months before the election in 2016. 
Thanks for joining us.</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 112: The Rochester Police Department&apos;s &quot;Culture of Insularity&quot;</title><itunes:title>Episode 112: The Rochester Police Department&apos;s &quot;Culture of Insularity&quot;</itunes:title><description>In this episode we discuss the report on the RPD&apos;s handling of Daniel Prude. According the evidence released, we think the RPD took steps to skew their handling of the case. Internal and external documents show how a &quot;culture of insularity&quot; at the RPD sought to shift blame from the officers onto Daniel Prude. You can read the report on the RPD here: https://www.youtube.com/redirect?v=8hXS_dLpcJ4&amp;amp;redir_token=QUFFLUhqbXRyR0MwUW5ieVltVGVPekVkYzhGelZVeHpkQXxBQ3Jtc0trMGFWTkJsLVBMTGNKT0J3RXJUNGZzZ1R5QVZGcF9uSGlTY0RZTjh6eWNHQ3pqckhaampDLWdySGR1VGVnbFdoWFRxcTJnczNSSWcyNk5uUEoxSHVndDhibVlJdml0QXJXM3o2X1paU3ZyZTE3aG9Ibw%3D%3D&amp;amp;event=video_description&amp;amp;q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cityofrochester.gov%2Frpdreformrelease91420%2F (https://www.cityofrochester.gov/rpdre...).
</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we discuss the report on the RPD's handling of Daniel Prude. According the evidence released, we think the RPD took steps to skew their handling of the case. Internal and external documents show how a "culture of insularity" at the RPD sought to shift blame from the officers onto Daniel Prude. You can read the report on the RPD here: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/redirect?v=8hXS_dLpcJ4&amp;redir_token=QUFFLUhqbXRyR0MwUW5ieVltVGVPekVkYzhGelZVeHpkQXxBQ3Jtc0trMGFWTkJsLVBMTGNKT0J3RXJUNGZzZ1R5QVZGcF9uSGlTY0RZTjh6eWNHQ3pqckhaampDLWdySGR1VGVnbFdoWFRxcTJnczNSSWcyNk5uUEoxSHVndDhibVlJdml0QXJXM3o2X1paU3ZyZTE3aG9Ibw%3D%3D&amp;event=video_description&amp;q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cityofrochester.gov%2Frpdreformrelease91420%2F" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.cityofrochester.gov/rpdre...</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://eod.captivate.fm/episode/episode-112-the-rochester-police-departments-culture-of-insularity]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">739dd7a9-e668-4997-bbc9-1eb62f1078ce</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fd0a2630-0004-411b-9495-9d1c9631d824/cgbyutqumsxlolqqqgi10qxh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Evidence of Design]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/d5c57e68-f1d4-44a5-a667-02f55b4969c3/episode-112.mp3" length="42621470" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>53:38</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>112</itunes:episode><itunes:summary>In this episode we discuss the report on the RPD&apos;s handling of Daniel Prude. According the evidence released, we think the RPD took steps to skew their handling of the case. Internal and external documents show how a &quot;culture of insularity&quot; at the RPD sought to shift blame from the officers onto Daniel Prude. You can read the report on the RPD here: https://www.youtube.com/redirect?v=8hXS_dLpcJ4andredir_token=QUFFLUhqbXRyR0MwUW5ieVltVGVPekVkYzhGelZVeHpkQXxBQ3Jtc0trMGFWTkJsLVBMTGNKT0J3RXJUNGZzZ1R5QVZGcF9uSGlTY0RZTjh6eWNHQ3pqckhaampDLWdySGR1VGVnbFdoWFRxcTJnczNSSWcyNk5uUEoxSHVndDhibVlJdml0QXJXM3o2X1paU3ZyZTE3aG9Ibw%3D%3Dandevent=video_descriptionandq=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cityofrochester.gov%2Frpdreformrelease91420%2F (https://www.cityofrochester.gov/rpdre...).</itunes:summary><itunes:author>Evidence of Design</itunes:author></item></channel></rss>