<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://feeds.captivate.fm/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"><channel><atom:link href="https://feeds.captivate.fm/pep/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><title><![CDATA[The Planning, Environment & Property Podcast]]></title><podcast:guid>9f1a8a63-ef4d-5775-8ffb-433792f5cbfb</podcast:guid><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><generator>Captivate.fm</generator><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><copyright><![CDATA[Copyright 2025 39 Essex Chambers]]></copyright><managingEditor>39 Essex Chambers</managingEditor><itunes:summary><![CDATA[The Planning, Environment & Property Podcast is brought to you by the members of the 39 Essex Chambers.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><itunes:owner><itunes:name>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author><description>The Planning, Environment &amp; Property Podcast is brought to you by the members of the 39 Essex Chambers.</description><link>https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/</link><atom:link href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" rel="hub"/><itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Brought to you by the members of the 39 Essex Chambers]]></itunes:subtitle><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><itunes:category text="Business"></itunes:category><itunes:category text="Education"></itunes:category><itunes:category text="News"></itunes:category><podcast:locked>no</podcast:locked><podcast:medium>podcast</podcast:medium><item><title>Hot Topics Episode 7: Demystifying Noise Evidence - with Rupert Thornely Taylor - Part 2</title><itunes:title>Hot Topics Episode 7: Demystifying Noise Evidence - with Rupert Thornely Taylor - Part 2</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Noise impacts are an issue which often crops up as part of planning and infrastructure applications either because the development applied for is noisy or the environment into which it is proposed to be introduced is noisy. The evidence is often complex and difficult for those of us who aren’t seasoned noise experts to understand. </p><p>Who better to de-mystify noise evidence than Rupert Thornely-Taylor? Rupert has practiced in the field of noise for many years and it is no understatement to state that he is a leader in his field. He was awarded the Rayleigh medal by the Institute of Acoustics for his outstanding contribution to acoustics in 2016.  </p><p>Victoria Hutton, member of 39 Essex Chambers, is joined by Rupert Thornely Taylor, Managing Director of Rupert Taylor Ltd for two episodes. Part one deals with the basics of noise assessment, noise policy and some examples of how noise impacts upon decision-making. Part two addresses the agent of change principle and nuisance. </p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noise impacts are an issue which often crops up as part of planning and infrastructure applications either because the development applied for is noisy or the environment into which it is proposed to be introduced is noisy. The evidence is often complex and difficult for those of us who aren’t seasoned noise experts to understand. </p><p>Who better to de-mystify noise evidence than Rupert Thornely-Taylor? Rupert has practiced in the field of noise for many years and it is no understatement to state that he is a leader in his field. He was awarded the Rayleigh medal by the Institute of Acoustics for his outstanding contribution to acoustics in 2016.  </p><p>Victoria Hutton, member of 39 Essex Chambers, is joined by Rupert Thornely Taylor, Managing Director of Rupert Taylor Ltd for two episodes. Part one deals with the basics of noise assessment, noise policy and some examples of how noise impacts upon decision-making. Part two addresses the agent of change principle and nuisance. </p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">3fcc3dd1-a5e4-4caf-83b4-c2e4e91cae3a</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/529fbcfe-7bd8-4621-9bd4-4f25cee0a1fb/zuscgTUUIeLpWxncwqN1HGGW.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/e4b05bc7-263c-4324-b9fd-a6d5d4c957c1/30-PEP-Mixdown.mp3" length="28538254" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>19:29</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>22</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Hot Topics Episode 6: Demystifying Noise Evidence - with Rupert Thornely Taylor - Part 1</title><itunes:title>Hot Topics Episode 6: Demystifying Noise Evidence - with Rupert Thornely Taylor - Part 1</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Noise impacts are an issue which often crops up as part of planning and infrastructure applications either because the development applied for is noisy or the environment into which it is proposed to be introduced is noisy. The evidence is often complex and difficult for those of us who aren’t seasoned noise experts to understand. </p><p>Who better to de-mystify noise evidence than Rupert Thornely-Taylor? Rupert has practiced in the field of noise for many years and it is no understatement to state that he is a leader in his field. He was awarded the Rayleigh medal by the Institute of Acoustics for his outstanding contribution to acoustics in 2016.  </p><p>Victoria Hutton, member of 39 Essex Chambers, is joined by Rupert Thornely Taylor, Managing Director of Rupert Taylor Ltd for two episodes. Part one deals with the basics of noise assessment, noise policy and some examples of how noise impacts upon decision-making. Part two addresses the agent of change principle and nuisance. </p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noise impacts are an issue which often crops up as part of planning and infrastructure applications either because the development applied for is noisy or the environment into which it is proposed to be introduced is noisy. The evidence is often complex and difficult for those of us who aren’t seasoned noise experts to understand. </p><p>Who better to de-mystify noise evidence than Rupert Thornely-Taylor? Rupert has practiced in the field of noise for many years and it is no understatement to state that he is a leader in his field. He was awarded the Rayleigh medal by the Institute of Acoustics for his outstanding contribution to acoustics in 2016.  </p><p>Victoria Hutton, member of 39 Essex Chambers, is joined by Rupert Thornely Taylor, Managing Director of Rupert Taylor Ltd for two episodes. Part one deals with the basics of noise assessment, noise policy and some examples of how noise impacts upon decision-making. Part two addresses the agent of change principle and nuisance. </p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">053b24e6-8d29-4fbb-a526-5b3e1903e797</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/207ff49b-1e24-4b10-a2f2-d3ac46d94b0d/A2AapKLdedzK2U-iVGa9NvHS.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/30362db4-11d0-481e-a30c-25be2eac2de3/29-PEP-Mixdown.mp3" length="37816458" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>25:55</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>21</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Hot Topics Episode 4: How should Greenhouse Gas Emissions be Cumulatively Assessed?</title><itunes:title>Hot Topics Episode 4: How should Greenhouse Gas Emissions be Cumulatively Assessed?</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode Tora Hutton and Rose Grogan discuss the Court of Appeal’s decision in R(oao Boswell) v Secretary of State for Transport [2024] EWCA CIv 145 which considered the lawfulness of the Secretary of State’s approach to the cumulative assessment of three road transport schemes in Norfolk. </p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode Tora Hutton and Rose Grogan discuss the Court of Appeal’s decision in R(oao Boswell) v Secretary of State for Transport [2024] EWCA CIv 145 which considered the lawfulness of the Secretary of State’s approach to the cumulative assessment of three road transport schemes in Norfolk. </p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/information-hub/insight/hot-topics-episode-4-how-should-greenhouse-gas-emissions-be-cumulatively]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">ec967923-e4f1-4e1b-ab1f-f1fbc1f1029e</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/7b6e8cf2-ab0a-4a32-9b27-3ce3f02ba4b2/EMojC3i3NGd2_xhYL7rnCYWu.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 05:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/ade92758-2216-4713-a19c-5641f75198aa/19-PEP-Mixdown.mp3" length="32452307" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>22:12</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>19</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Hot Topics Episode 3: Housing for key workers, is this the new affordable housing model?</title><itunes:title>Hot Topics Episode 3: Housing for key workers, is this the new affordable housing model?</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Tora Hutton is joined by Paul Stinchcombe KC and Ian Parker of McPartland Planning to discuss their recent success in promoting an appeal scheme for affordable housing for key workers in the Green Belt. They consider whether this approach is likely to be replicated in other areas of the country. </p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tora Hutton is joined by Paul Stinchcombe KC and Ian Parker of McPartland Planning to discuss their recent success in promoting an appeal scheme for affordable housing for key workers in the Green Belt. They consider whether this approach is likely to be replicated in other areas of the country. </p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/information-hub/insight/hot-topics-episode-3-housing-key-workers-new-affordable-housing-model]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">0a59796e-b499-4a1a-b8c6-839381bead04</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/1016206f-2b04-49ef-9dfd-e3890c9dc1cc/yDSiU27s7_udPptAa5VZJ6vZ.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 06:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/b06034e7-6c05-43f1-a04c-454f407049cb/18-PEP-Mixdown.mp3" length="39238177" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>26:55</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>18</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Hot Topics Episode 2: Is there now momentum in favour of housing appeals in the green belt being allowed? - A St Albans case study</title><itunes:title>Hot Topics Episode 2: Is there now momentum in favour of housing appeals in the green belt being allowed? - A St Albans case study</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.39essex.com/profile/victoria-hutton" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tora Hutton</a> is joined by <a href="https://www.39essex.com/profile/paul-stinchcombe-kc" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Paul Stinchcombe KC</a> of 39 Essex Chambers to discuss whether recent appeal decisions mean that there is now momentum in favour of grants of planning permission for residential development in the Green Belt. They look at St Albans as a case study.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.39essex.com/profile/victoria-hutton" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tora Hutton</a> is joined by <a href="https://www.39essex.com/profile/paul-stinchcombe-kc" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Paul Stinchcombe KC</a> of 39 Essex Chambers to discuss whether recent appeal decisions mean that there is now momentum in favour of grants of planning permission for residential development in the Green Belt. They look at St Albans as a case study.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/information-hub/insight/hot-topics-episode-2-there-now-momentum-favour-housing-appeals-green-belt]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">bd0bf9ec-fe1b-41f3-bc5f-5381cf67a093</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/3d328ce7-9cad-49f1-85d5-19eec1532733/Nakw4M9_pw7IxiL2QsdFFjMm.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 06:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/e11526f0-7785-4268-815d-edabf60b19f2/17-PEP-Mixdown.mp3" length="27132387" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>18:30</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>17</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Episode 1: Introduction - Hot Topics in Planning and Environmental Law Series</title><itunes:title>Episode 1: Introduction - Hot Topics in Planning and Environmental Law Series</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, <a href="https://www.39essex.com/profile/victoria-hutton" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tora Hutton</a> provides a short introduction to the podcast series Hot Topics in Planning and Environmental Law.</p><p>-</p><p>In this podcast series Tora Hutton interviews fellow members of 39 Essex Chambers and special guests on hot topics in the planning and environmental space. Each episode will focus on a discrete subject. Whether the focus is an important judgment, an appeal decision, a policy amendment or a longstanding issue affecting practitioners the podcast will inform and, hopefully, entertain.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, <a href="https://www.39essex.com/profile/victoria-hutton" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tora Hutton</a> provides a short introduction to the podcast series Hot Topics in Planning and Environmental Law.</p><p>-</p><p>In this podcast series Tora Hutton interviews fellow members of 39 Essex Chambers and special guests on hot topics in the planning and environmental space. Each episode will focus on a discrete subject. Whether the focus is an important judgment, an appeal decision, a policy amendment or a longstanding issue affecting practitioners the podcast will inform and, hopefully, entertain.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/information-hub/insight/hot-topics-planning-and-environmental-law-introduction]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">5bc99842-683a-425d-824a-f3c1c015dac0</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/30890a3d-e26c-40f0-b568-9591a3f3c329/48nISpmXVc0XoNDA2IXaiugh.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 06:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/db537031-8d30-4e0e-b6ef-a29fd4e955bb/16-PEP-NEW-mixdown.mp3" length="2731019" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>01:32</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>16</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Lobbying Councillors: Writing to the Committee</title><itunes:title>Lobbying Councillors: Writing to the Committee</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In the second in his short series on lobbying councillors, Richard Harwood QC looks&nbsp;at how, when and what to write when making representations to councillors.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the second in his short series on lobbying councillors, Richard Harwood QC looks&nbsp;at how, when and what to write when making representations to councillors.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">b60cf770-a76d-49bf-a5b6-ba5645351689</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 09:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/840cd6cb-044a-4fb9-8142-efa91441eec7/15-pepp-mixdown.mp3" length="13690660" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>09:29</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>15</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Planning and the way out of Lockdown for Hospitality</title><itunes:title>Planning and the way out of Lockdown for Hospitality</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>What can cafes, restaurants, pubs and attractions do to increase trade outdoors as lockdown eases? More space? Marquees? Richard Harwood QC looks at the planning and pavement licensing rules that apply.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can cafes, restaurants, pubs and attractions do to increase trade outdoors as lockdown eases? More space? Marquees? Richard Harwood QC looks at the planning and pavement licensing rules that apply.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">3c9451d8-cb91-49f3-a503-3edae557aa19</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/76027d48-c49a-42d0-96d3-4a7de2e6be92/16-pepp-mixdown.mp3" length="20748088" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>14:23</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>14</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>EqIAs: Ignore their significance at your peril</title><itunes:title>EqIAs: Ignore their significance at your peril</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith looks at Equalities Impact Assessments (EqIAs) in the context of planning and traffic schemes, highlighted&nbsp;&nbsp;by&nbsp;the recent High Court success&nbsp;of the London Taxi Drivers in their challenge to the Mayor’s <em>Streetspace</em> plan in&nbsp;<em>R(oao United Trade Action Group) v Transport for London and Mayor of London </em>[2021] EWHC 72 (Admin).</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith looks at Equalities Impact Assessments (EqIAs) in the context of planning and traffic schemes, highlighted&nbsp;&nbsp;by&nbsp;the recent High Court success&nbsp;of the London Taxi Drivers in their challenge to the Mayor’s <em>Streetspace</em> plan in&nbsp;<em>R(oao United Trade Action Group) v Transport for London and Mayor of London </em>[2021] EWHC 72 (Admin).</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">72e1bd56-d577-4f30-8c56-9788f44fb965</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 09:30:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/7d1750f4-ff2f-43a2-80a2-0fdd4ce004c1/13-b-pepp-mixdown.mp3" length="32239412" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>22:22</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>12</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>When Fixation Becomes Legal Irrationality</title><itunes:title>When Fixation Becomes Legal Irrationality</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith looks at the circumstances in which this&nbsp;ground&nbsp;&nbsp;of challenge was upheld by&nbsp;Mrs Justice Lang&nbsp;in&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>R(United Trade Action Group) v Transport for London and Mayor of London </em>[2021] EWHC 72 (Admin) and by Mr Justice Holgate in <em>R ( Pearce) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy</em> [2021] EWHC 326 (Admin).</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith looks at the circumstances in which this&nbsp;ground&nbsp;&nbsp;of challenge was upheld by&nbsp;Mrs Justice Lang&nbsp;in&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>R(United Trade Action Group) v Transport for London and Mayor of London </em>[2021] EWHC 72 (Admin) and by Mr Justice Holgate in <em>R ( Pearce) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy</em> [2021] EWHC 326 (Admin).</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">f9511129-78a4-4135-b22c-a846393e0d91</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 09:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/9d23b5fd-74bc-4583-95f6-910822793867/14-c-pepp-mixdown.mp3" length="16874412" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>11:42</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>13</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Lessons To Be Learned From “That” Parish Council Meeting</title><itunes:title>Lessons To Be Learned From “That” Parish Council Meeting</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith discusses the procedural issues surrounding&nbsp;Handforth’s Parish Council’s infamous&nbsp;Zoom meeting.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith discusses the procedural issues surrounding&nbsp;Handforth’s Parish Council’s infamous&nbsp;Zoom meeting.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">e145a201-335f-4b66-9f90-00a2a6a05984</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 09:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/7ea744df-7299-4859-b250-a52ebb045ba6/12-pepp-mixdown.mp3" length="26976224" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>18:43</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>11</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Pension Schemes and Climate Change – a discussion of the new changes</title><itunes:title>Pension Schemes and Climate Change – a discussion of the new changes</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Katherine Apps and Gethin Thomas discuss the&nbsp;Pensions Schemes Bill 2019, passed through Parliament on 19 January 2019, which create regulation making powers to impose governance and information publication duties on pension schemes in relation to climate change. They also discuss the government consolation response,&nbsp;draft regulations and Pension Regulator’s enforcement powers in relation to these new climate change duties. They discuss how those powers and regulations have been structured, what practical impact this might have on investment decisions by pension schemes and the possible shape of potential future legal challenges.</p><p>This is a companion podcast to their <a href="https://www.39essex.com/katherine-apps-and-gethin-thomas-on-climate-change-and-pensions/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">article</a>.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Katherine Apps and Gethin Thomas discuss the&nbsp;Pensions Schemes Bill 2019, passed through Parliament on 19 January 2019, which create regulation making powers to impose governance and information publication duties on pension schemes in relation to climate change. They also discuss the government consolation response,&nbsp;draft regulations and Pension Regulator’s enforcement powers in relation to these new climate change duties. They discuss how those powers and regulations have been structured, what practical impact this might have on investment decisions by pension schemes and the possible shape of potential future legal challenges.</p><p>This is a companion podcast to their <a href="https://www.39essex.com/katherine-apps-and-gethin-thomas-on-climate-change-and-pensions/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">article</a>.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">4e9d5bcf-fac2-43e5-b620-fa7c2f2bfccf</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:45:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/d01dc8b0-2a42-4df0-a754-819a5d401f89/10-pepp-mixdown.mp3" length="13995788" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>09:42</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>10</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Can you lobby councillors? Richard Harwood OBE QC</title><itunes:title>Can you lobby councillors? Richard Harwood OBE QC</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In the first of a short series on lobbying councillors, Richard Harwood QC looks at the <em>Holborn Studios (No2) </em>judgment and asks the fundamental question: is there a right to communicate directly with elected politicians?</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first of a short series on lobbying councillors, Richard Harwood QC looks at the <em>Holborn Studios (No2) </em>judgment and asks the fundamental question: is there a right to communicate directly with elected politicians?</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">878e43d1-8d9c-40ac-a388-a28d904d85b1</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 02:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/c9abdfac-5523-42e4-8141-78e5d463151c/9-pep-mixdown-final.mp3" length="21748696" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>15:05</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>9</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Planning Court Reform</title><itunes:title>Planning Court Reform</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Richard Harwood QC considers the four different ways of bringing proceedings in the Planning Court and asks whether four should become one.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Harwood QC considers the four different ways of bringing proceedings in the Planning Court and asks whether four should become one.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">9604dede-77b8-4b13-8a8e-edbaf04758ce</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 16:30:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/d30f8992-aaa4-4e91-8014-0316a42ec492/8-pepp-mixdown.mp3" length="20680467" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>14:21</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>8</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>That ADR Feeling</title><itunes:title>That ADR Feeling</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith considers this topic in the context of the current round of consultation on changes to the Judicial Review:&nbsp;the Government commissioned Faulks’ Independent Review&nbsp;of Administrative Law (which closed on 26<sup>th</sup> October) and the Civil Justice Council’s review of Pre-Action Protocols (which opened on 27<sup>th</sup> October and&nbsp;closes on 18<sup>th</sup> December). He also considers, by way of example, the case of <em>R (on the application of Janice Hemms) v Bath &amp; North East Somerset Council &amp; Kate Chubb</em> <em>[2020] EWHC 2721 (Admin</em>),&nbsp;a recent decision of Sir Ross Cranston, former Head off the Administrative Court, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith considers this topic in the context of the current round of consultation on changes to the Judicial Review:&nbsp;the Government commissioned Faulks’ Independent Review&nbsp;of Administrative Law (which closed on 26<sup>th</sup> October) and the Civil Justice Council’s review of Pre-Action Protocols (which opened on 27<sup>th</sup> October and&nbsp;closes on 18<sup>th</sup> December). He also considers, by way of example, the case of <em>R (on the application of Janice Hemms) v Bath &amp; North East Somerset Council &amp; Kate Chubb</em> <em>[2020] EWHC 2721 (Admin</em>),&nbsp;a recent decision of Sir Ross Cranston, former Head off the Administrative Court, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">bebce63f-01ab-4a95-bbd6-2796c87fa97a</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:15:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/ca482839-3558-4bba-a34f-9d9c64f728b4/7-pepp-mixdown-b.mp3" length="38897820" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>27:00</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>7</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Openness in a year of Lockdowns</title><itunes:title>Openness in a year of Lockdowns</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith reviews the Higher Courts cases on the correct approach to this Green Belt thorny issue, starting with the Supreme Court’s judgment&nbsp;in <em><u>R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) Ltd)&nbsp;v North Yorkshire County Council</u> [2020] UKSC 3</em> , and,&nbsp;those of the Court of Appeal in <em><u>Hook&nbsp;v Secretary for Housing, Communities and Local Government</u> [2020] EWCA Civ 486</em>, &nbsp;<em><u>R (Liverpool Open and Green Spaces Community Interest Company) v Liverpool City Council</u> [2020] EWCA Civ </em>81 and , &nbsp;<em><u>R (Lochairlot Investments Ltd&nbsp;v Mendip District Council &amp; Norton St Philip Parish Council </u>[2020] EWCA Civ 1259.&nbsp;</em></p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith reviews the Higher Courts cases on the correct approach to this Green Belt thorny issue, starting with the Supreme Court’s judgment&nbsp;in <em><u>R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) Ltd)&nbsp;v North Yorkshire County Council</u> [2020] UKSC 3</em> , and,&nbsp;those of the Court of Appeal in <em><u>Hook&nbsp;v Secretary for Housing, Communities and Local Government</u> [2020] EWCA Civ 486</em>, &nbsp;<em><u>R (Liverpool Open and Green Spaces Community Interest Company) v Liverpool City Council</u> [2020] EWCA Civ </em>81 and , &nbsp;<em><u>R (Lochairlot Investments Ltd&nbsp;v Mendip District Council &amp; Norton St Philip Parish Council </u>[2020] EWCA Civ 1259.&nbsp;</em></p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">5a1244a5-bbbb-46b5-9e3d-5d9304993cf9</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 13:30:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/65915228-083d-47df-a799-5ff42ed8c015/6-pepp-mixdown.mp3" length="15415006" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>10:41</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>That Technical Traps Submission - John Pugh-Smith</title><itunes:title>That Technical Traps Submission - John Pugh-Smith</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith, wearing his hat as an arbitrator and neutral&nbsp;dispute resolver, discusses the significance of the recent case of <em>Norfolk Homes Ltd v North Norfolk DC [2020] EWHC&nbsp;2265 (QB) </em>on the interpretation of Section 106 deeds and obligations and why a&nbsp;more lenient approach to Local Planning Authorities has been judicially rejected.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith, wearing his hat as an arbitrator and neutral&nbsp;dispute resolver, discusses the significance of the recent case of <em>Norfolk Homes Ltd v North Norfolk DC [2020] EWHC&nbsp;2265 (QB) </em>on the interpretation of Section 106 deeds and obligations and why a&nbsp;more lenient approach to Local Planning Authorities has been judicially rejected.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">a0110bb7-2dd9-4b1f-bd7c-3dc557f5e73f</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/169d1748-6e61-4266-8f84-a087d6ccd8a7/5-peppb.mp3" length="11624001" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>08:03</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>An Opportunity Not to Be Missed Again - John Pugh-Smith</title><itunes:title>An Opportunity Not to Be Missed Again - John Pugh-Smith</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith FSA FCIArb, a leading mediator and promoter of the use of its facilitative techniques in the planning and compensation systems, discusses how it can be utilised not just help the Government deliver the intentions behind the current Planning White Paper but also the current planning system</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode John Pugh-Smith FSA FCIArb, a leading mediator and promoter of the use of its facilitative techniques in the planning and compensation systems, discusses how it can be utilised not just help the Government deliver the intentions behind the current Planning White Paper but also the current planning system</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">6e6e7c0e-3619-411f-9136-d8877404ac73</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:30:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/39b68b88-2433-4a11-9c56-b6b09e174ef9/4-pepp.mp3" length="11141852" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>07:43</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>4</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>Cold War – with Richard Harwood QC</title><itunes:title>Cold War – with Richard Harwood QC</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Richard discusses the planning battle over a relic of the Cold War in Cambridge and asks what does it tell us about ourselves?</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Richard discusses the planning battle over a relic of the Cold War in Cambridge and asks what does it tell us about ourselves?</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">e3113996-6ecc-4196-8a3e-6d7369d6294a</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/2c19f87c-f3b5-4622-81db-494edb8dbe60/3-pepp.mp3" length="26636235" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>18:29</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>3</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>CONTROLLING DEMOLITION IN PLANNING AND THE SAVE BRITAIN’S HERITAGE LANCASTER CASE  - Richard Harwood OBE QC</title><itunes:title>CONTROLLING DEMOLITION IN PLANNING AND THE SAVE BRITAIN’S HERITAGE LANCASTER CASE  - Richard Harwood OBE QC</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast, Richard Harwood QC looks at how planning law finally took control over the demolition of buildings.  In 2009 the former Mitchell’s Brewery site was the subject of an epic battle as SAVE Britain’s Heritage fought to save it, challenging the government’s Demolition Direction in the process.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast, Richard Harwood QC looks at how planning law finally took control over the demolition of buildings.  In 2009 the former Mitchell’s Brewery site was the subject of an epic battle as SAVE Britain’s Heritage fought to save it, challenging the government’s Demolition Direction in the process.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">69f9f63a-3440-4eeb-87c6-367bf32e051e</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/1b02a80a-31e8-4e78-b995-c6a49fcc2ccd/2-pepp.mp3" length="17138661" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>11:53</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item><item><title>A SHORT HISTORY OF SHORT CUTS IN THE PLANNING SYSTEM - Richard Harwood OBE QC</title><itunes:title>A SHORT HISTORY OF SHORT CUTS IN THE PLANNING SYSTEM - Richard Harwood OBE QC</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast, Richard Harwood QC looks at the numerous ways of obtaining planning consent without making a planning application to the local authority and asks, how far have development orders and zoning been used?</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast, Richard Harwood QC looks at the numerous ways of obtaining planning consent without making a planning application to the local authority and asks, how far have development orders and zoning been used?</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://www.39essex.com/category/podcasts/]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">0b32b5ae-4522-48b9-9112-20a335b7a728</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/25c7318a-2bc7-4d3c-9bb2-5f433174f3a2/o_I9HQb9DXSwl181O3erz1iG.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[39 Essex Chambers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:00:00 +0100</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/9466614c-cd22-4203-be44-a9e6a2683f4e/1-pepp.mp3" length="16493235" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>11:27</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode><podcast:episode>1</podcast:episode><itunes:author>39 Essex Chambers</itunes:author></item></channel></rss>