<![CDATA[PUBLIC HEARING with BODIE JENKINS]]>854957a4-67a7-5da1-9023-105f928b331bWed, 17 Jun 2026 02:59:07 +0000Captivate.fmBodie Jenkinshttps://artwork.captivate.fm/a56f3130-bdcb-424f-8516-2fdf37976a59/Public-Hearing-9-copy.jpegPUBLIC HEARING with BODIE JENKINSBodie JenkinsBodie JenkinsPublic Hearing breaks down Supreme Court cases and major social issues by examining both sides with clarity, fairness, and real analysis - not political spin. Hosted by Bodie Jenkins, the show focuses on understanding before judgment, using evidence and open-minded discussion to get closer to the truth. A deeply engaged high school student, Bodie is involved in the judicial process and public policy, examining multiple perspectives on current court cases and the issues shaping our nation at both the federal and local levels. Every story has multiple angles, and this podcast works to cut through the distortions of modern media, offering a deep dive into the realities and processes that shape our lives. Just as the Supreme Court writes dissenting opinions, he draws from his experience as Mock Trial President to analyze differing points of view with scrutiny - not ignoring them, but engaging them directly. Grounded in evidence and reason, he challenges easy narratives and invites listeners to think critically and challenge our biases. In a time of polarized discourse, Public Hearing offers something different: thoughtful conversation, rigorous analysis, and a commitment to thoughtful, evidence-based discussion.https://public-hearing-with-bodie-jenkins.captivate.fmfalseepisodicnopodcastWho Decides War? Congress, the President, and the Fight for War PowersWho Decides War? Congress, the President, and the Fight for War PowersThe War Powers Resolution was passed in the aftermath of the Vietnam War to limit the President's ability to engage in prolonged military action without congressional approval. More than fifty years later, it remains one of the most debated questions in constitutional law: who ultimately decides when the United States goes to war?

This episode explores the history of the War Powers Resolution, the constitutional arguments surrounding presidential war powers, and its relevance to recent tensions with Iran. The discussion covers the June 3 congressional vote, key Supreme Court precedents such as Youngstown and Curtiss-Wright, and the competing views on how much authority should rest with Congress versus the President during international crises.

The episode also examines the potential economic, political, and foreign policy consequences of military action, while considering how decisions made today may shape the future balance of power in the federal government.

Featuring Time Travel Take and Future Flash.

Hosted by Bodie Jenkins.

]]>The War Powers Resolution was passed in the aftermath of the Vietnam War to limit the President's ability to engage in prolonged military action without congressional approval. More than fifty years later, it remains one of the most debated questions in constitutional law: who ultimately decides when the United States goes to war?

This episode explores the history of the War Powers Resolution, the constitutional arguments surrounding presidential war powers, and its relevance to recent tensions with Iran. The discussion covers the June 3 congressional vote, key Supreme Court precedents such as Youngstown and Curtiss-Wright, and the competing views on how much authority should rest with Congress versus the President during international crises.

The episode also examines the potential economic, political, and foreign policy consequences of military action, while considering how decisions made today may shape the future balance of power in the federal government.

Featuring Time Travel Take and Future Flash.

Hosted by Bodie Jenkins.

]]>cbd9ade8-e59c-450f-b6d0-f3488471aaebTue, 16 Jun 2026 19:50:00 -070022:19falsefull1221The Algorithm DilemmaThe Algorithm DilemmaIN THIS EPISODE

• An overview of the legal debate surrounding social media algorithms and platform design.

THE CASE

K.G.M. v. Meta

• A lawsuit alleging that Instagram’s algorithmic design contributed to mental health harms.

WHY IT MATTERS

• Addresses how courts may treat algorithmic design and platform responsibility.

• Could shape future interpretations of Section 230 and technology regulation.

TOPICS DISCUSSED

• Claims regarding addictive platform design and mental health impacts.

• Legal protections for online platforms under Section 230.

• Free speech considerations and user responsibility.

SEGMENTS

• Moral Minute

• Future Flash

• Time Travel Take

]]>IN THIS EPISODE

• An overview of the legal debate surrounding social media algorithms and platform design.

THE CASE

K.G.M. v. Meta

• A lawsuit alleging that Instagram’s algorithmic design contributed to mental health harms.

WHY IT MATTERS

• Addresses how courts may treat algorithmic design and platform responsibility.

• Could shape future interpretations of Section 230 and technology regulation.

TOPICS DISCUSSED

• Claims regarding addictive platform design and mental health impacts.

• Legal protections for online platforms under Section 230.

• Free speech considerations and user responsibility.

SEGMENTS

• Moral Minute

• Future Flash

• Time Travel Take

]]>c315d6c1-786b-40b4-8bc8-f8b5dc40cb9aSun, 15 Mar 2026 22:50:00 -070022:16falsefull1111