• First, our 12-month S&P 500 price target remains 7,750, and we assume the index has put in a fragile, foggy bottom.
• Second, we run through our thoughts on what we’re hoping to learn more about in the upcoming reporting season.
• Third, other things that jump out include how 2026 EPS growth forecasts for most sectors have been frozen since the start of the war, and the decline in consumer expectations for stock market performance over the next 12 months.

• First, the tactical indicators we’ve been tracking to gauge when equity investors’ fears may have gone too far continue to show signs of significant deterioration but are not yet pointing to extreme fear suggesting more downside in stocks remains possible in the near term.
• Second, other things that jump out include new stress tests on our valuation/EPS model, the latest C-suite tone, the signals from our US GDP model for the S&P 500 if consensus forecasts start to erode, and evidence of derisking in equities in the latest funds flows data.

1. First, we review our key takeaways from our review of March company commentary on the Middle East conflict on EPS calls and in conference presentations. What we read adds to our understanding of why the US equity market has been fairly resilient since the Iran strikes, and also leads us to believe that it may simply take more time for the equity community to fully understand the impacts from an extended conflict.
2. Second, other things that jump out this week include much better EPS estimate revisions trends in the top-10 market cap names in the S&P 500 than the rest of the index (a point in favor of mega cap Growth stocks continuing to outperform), the sharp drop in investor sentiment on our AAII model (a bullish data point for the broader market) and the return of the Russell 2000 FY2 P/E to its long-term average (important progress but not a return to “hold your nose and buy” territory).

1. First, in tandem with the 5% decline in the S&P 500, investor and consumer sentiment have slipped in recent updates as investors have digested the possibility of a longer conflict in Iran and consumers have started to notice higher gas prices.
2. Second, we review our macro takeaways from RBC’s Financial Institutions conference, where we detected echoes of the lingering confidence and emerging concerns that are seen in the surveys we discuss.

The team discussed recent events in the Middle East and the implications for the US economy and stock market, and was moderated by Brian Sullivan of CNBC.

1. First, we review the results of a survey we conducted of RBC’s equity analysts on the conflict in Iran, which helps explain the resilience we’ve seen in the S&P 500.
2. Second, the valuation and sentiment barometers we’re tracking point to room for further downside in the S&P 500 in the near-term in absolute terms, while our work on US valuations vs. other global developed markets highlights why the US equity market has been embraced as a safe haven, helping outperformance versus global peers to re-ignite.

1. We run through five things we’re thinking about regarding recent developments in the Middle East from a stock market perspective.
2. Then, we wrap up with a few things we’re watching in terms of general stats to help us know when the recent risk off mood in markets may have played out.

1. First, the stock market is still experiencing a growth scare, in our view, where it is attempting to stabilize. We see more downside if recession is priced in.
2. Second, we review how the process of resetting EPS expectations has begun, and run though key themes from the early reporters and companies that have presented at conferences since the Rose Garden. Our overarching takeaway from our reading is that recession is not yet a foregone conclusion but also that US equities are not out of the woods.
3. Third, we run through our latest thoughts on the Growth trade, which has been outperforming again, and note that it is not a clear-cut call.

1. First, we review our stance on Small Caps. We had a little more love for them coming into Valentine’s Day weekend due to better fundamentals, but still see challenges that raise the bar for further outperformance (less appealing positioning and valuations, plus continued linkage to evolving views on the Fed).
2. Second, other things that jump out include more evidence of a tough reporting season, the slide in sentiment on the AAII survey which is not signaling oversold conditions yet, and thoughts on why we’re not intrigued with the Tech sector yet from a generalist perspective.
3. Programming note: The podcast will be on break next week and resume later this month.

1. First, we run through our thoughts on last week’s choppy price action in the S&P 500 and reiterate our 7,750 12-month-forward S&P 500 price target.
2. Second, we update the stats we’re tracking for 4Q25 reporting season, which generally bounced back in our latest update but remain weaker than what we’ve seen in past reporting seasons.

1. First, reporting season stats have come in “slightly squishy” in our view, suggesting to us that the choppy price action in the S&P 500 of late has been about more than geopolitical concerns.
2. Second, what we read in earnings call transcripts this past week continues to suggest that the macro backdrop is mixed, though we are not seeing any indications of major problems.
3. Third, the thing that jumped out the most to us in our other updates was the slight downtick in optimism on the stock market outlook in the latest Conference Board consumer confidence survey.

1. First, the various earnings stats we track point to a sleepy start to reporting season, suggesting to us that geopolitics hasn’t been the only thing contributing to the US equity market’s recent gyrations. These stats also highlight how the mega cap growth trade has seen its dominance on the earnings front erode in some ways, helping fuel the rotation trade to Value and Small Caps.
2. Second, our review of this past week’s earnings call commentary suggests that views of the macro have been mixed, with geopolitical concerns and consumer pressures noted, but tariffs described as manageable.
3. Third, things that jump out from our other updates include the rise in the Russell 2000’s P/Es which are approaching 2024 highs

1. First, our thoughts on earnings heading into 4Q25 reporting season – questions we think need answering and stats we’re watching.
2. Second, other updates include our thoughts on implications in house views on the Fed for our own US equity market outlook, why we think last week’s economic data releases support the strong start to the year in US equities, why we think Small Cap performance is at an important crossroads vs. Large Cap, and how recent trends in funds flows capture the complex crosscurrents in place for US equities today.

1. First, we are upgrading S&P 500 Health Care to overweight from market weight.
2. Second, we are upgrading S&P 500 Communication Services to overweight from market weight.
3. Third, our other S&P 500 recommendations are unchanged. We remain overweight Financials and Materials, underweight Consumer Discretionary, and market weight all other sectors. Among our market weights, we have a preference for sectors that look attractively valued on our quant analysis (Consumer Staples, Energy, REITs) over those that look expensive (Utilities, Tech, and Industrials) which have been the early beneficiaries of the AI trade.
4. We also close with a quick thought on the biggest macro takeaways from our 4Q25 global analyst outlook survey.

• First, several things that US equity markets have been linked to (breadth, bitcoin, private market fears, Fed cut expectations, consumer sentiment) have gotten better in recent updates.
• Second, a few signals from our year-ahead outlook analysis have shifted over the past week.
• Third, there have been a few interesting twists and turns in positioning since Thanksgiving week in terms of sectors and factors.

• First, our 12-month-forward price target for the S&P 500 is 7,750, approximately the median and average of five different models that we use, which focus on sentiment, valuation, the appeal of stocks relative to bonds, the economic outlook, and monetary policy.
• Second, some of the key headwinds / downside risks and tailwinds / upside risks we’re monitoring include shifts in expectations for the economic backdrop, renewed interest in geographical diversification, and the midterm elections.
• Third, tactically (near term) we are leaning into the rotation in leadership within the US equity market from Growth to Value and the mega cap Growth trade to the rest of the market, but caution that a shift in earnings dynamics is still needed for this transition to have significant duration.
• Fourth, we have gotten more comfortable adding to Small Caps but see risk that recent outperformance ends up being short-lived once again unless the underlying economic backdrop / overall economic conditions heat up significantly.

• First, with the S&P 500 having finally entered what we consider to be tier 1 / garden-variety-pullback territory on Thursday, we review what we’re watching to help us gauge if / when the pullback has run its course.
• Second, with old leadership within US equities under pressure, we review which trades are working best right now (or might be starting to work) among the data sets we track regularly (Small Caps – at least on Friday and Value, sectors with valuation appeal, and safer factors).
• Third, we review what we learned from the consumer companies that reported over the past week (companies highlight a mixed macro backdrop, ongoing and intense consumer challenges, ample inventories, their ability to manage through tariffs, and more specific AI use case examples).

• First, earnings sentiment staged a partial comeback last week as the rate of upward EPS estimate revisions for the S&P 500 moved up again slightly vs. the prior week but remained below its August high.
• Second, we run through the latest big picture takeaways from S&P 500 earnings calls.
• Third, other things on our mind include our work the valuation profile of high earnings quality stocks within Small Cap and how we’re thinking about the government shutdown.

• First, the percent of S&P 500 companies beating consensus EPS forecasts remains well above 2Q25 levels despite slipping a little last week. Meanwhile, the rate of upward EPS estimate revisions improved slightly but remains well below the high of the last reporting season.
• Second, macro commentary in last week’s S&P 500 earnings calls remained mixed and varied by sector, with the strongest tone coming out of Tech and Health Care and the weakest tone coming from Consumer.
• Third, we noticed more tricks than treats as we ran through our latest updates over Halloween weekend, and run through some of the charts that are spooking us the most on the broader market right now.

• First, 3Q25 reporting season has gotten off to a strong start on beat rates for the major indices, but we are continuing to see deterioration in the rate of upward EPS estimate revisions for the S&P 500, the Russell 2000, the biggest market cap names in those indices, and the rest of both indices when their top weights are excluded – something we continue to see as a challenge for performance if it persists.
• Second, we run through the main macro takeaways we found in our review of last week’s S&P 500 earnings calls. The tone on the overall macro, consumer and tariffs came across as mixed, with a number of companies expressing optimism about improvements / stabilization underway or potentially coming into view.
• Third, other things that jump out in our updates this week include a new study we’ve published on the relationship between ROEs and P/Es in the major Small, Mid and Large Cap indices.

• First, earnings sentiment has been fading for the broader US equity market and is at a critical juncture for the biggest market cap names and Tech sector within the S&P 500.
• Second, macro signals were mixed from the S&P 500 companies that reported over the past few weeks.
• Third, our thoughts on Friday’s weakness in the S&P 500.

• First, across all industries and regions, our analysts are constructive on performance over the next 6-12 months.
• Second, at the global sector level our analysts have the most positive performance outlooks for REITs, Materials and Financials.
• Third, our analysts were slightly less optimistic on forward performance for Europe/UK than other regions.
• Fourth, our analysts generally had mixed views of the policy backdrop.
• Fifth, when we look at some of our macro indicators, Canada has been the bright spot in terms of performance YTD and over the past month.

• First, many of the US equity investors we met with last week were frustrated and wary.
• Second, other things that jump out in our work include a speech by the USTR to the financial community in NYC last week, the recent fade in the broadening trade and Small Cap leadership, the continued easing in earnings sentiment, and expectations around the shutdown’s duration in betting markets.

• First, we review what clients were most interested in talking about on our trip to the UK last week, which included differences between US and UK investor sentiment, valuations, geographical funds flows, and sectors.
• Second, we recap the macro tidbits we picked up from last week’s S&P 500 earnings calls (where the auto-related names had a negative tone), our takeaways from the Duke CFO survey that came out last week (optimism about their own companies moved up slightly), and what we learned from our review of how stocks have traded around government shutdowns in the past.

• First, weakness in Homebuilders doesn’t bode well for the recent outperformance of Small Caps.

• Second, we’ve continued to see some slippage in earnings sentiment (the rate of upward EPS estimate revisions) for the S&P 500, which has been driven by companies outside of the biggest market cap names.

• Third, bulls picked up sharply in the AAII survey last week.

• Fourth, our work on US equity market performance in the 12-month period following non-recession-related Fed cuts and reset cuts highlights upside risk to our 2H26 S&P 500 target price of 7,100.

• Fifth, capex growth improved in 2Q25.

• Sixth, US equity funds flows bounced back last week, driven by US-domiciled funds.

• The big thing you need to know: We are introducing preliminary forecasts for the S&P 500 for 2026 of 7,100 (a 2H26 price target) and $297 (full-year 2026 S&P 500 EPS). We think they should be viewed as a very early indication of how our models are tracking at the moment.

The big things you need to know:

• First, we see Friday’s weaker-than-expected jobs report as having added some additional uncertainty to the US equity market outlook at a time when we’ve been on guard for choppiness for other reasons.
• Second, we reiterate our overweight stance on the S&P 500 Materials sector.
• Third, other things that jump out to us include the weakness in bitcoin and the deterioration in US equity flows and retail flows specifically, which add to our near-term concerns.

• First, a better longer-term EPS outlook and more resilient operating margin forecasts help explain the recent outperformance of mega cap growth stocks and growth-oriented sectors
• Second, Small Caps recently saw a brief/mild outperformance pop on mounting Fed cut optimism, but we remain neutral on Small Caps given elevated valuations and below-average consensus GDP expectations.
• Third, mixed vibes to end the summer make us question whether the sentiment recovery that has powered US stocks may soon hit a speed bump.

Our overall impression from 2Q25 reporting season is that companies are managing through tariffs fairly well so far, but it’s still too early to assume tariffs won’t generate inflation pressures. We run through four takeaways on what we learned in 2Q25 reporting season last week regarding the overall tone, the state of demand, the consumer, and the timing of tariff impacts.

• First, we run through our first impressions from week 1 of 2Q25 reporting season in terms of both the stats and company commentary. Out of the gate, our impression is that it’s been fine but not fabulous.
• Second, we review what else jumps out to us on our high frequency indicators which includes the underperformance of quality factors, average levels of bullishness on the weekly AAII retail investor survey, and subdued flows to US equity funds.

• First, we review the bull thesis that we heard in client meetings last week, and our thoughts on where it could go wrong.
• Second, we review how the rally in equities has been looking a bit overdone on our valuation and EPS modeling, and how we’re also starting to run out of room on one of our sentiment studies.
• Third, conditions are rather mixed for US equities at the moment. We walk through things that look good, and things that look not so good. In the latter camp, one thing that stands out as particularly important to us is the failure of c-suite sentiment in widely followed surveys to inflect positively, as has been the case with consumer, small business, and investor sentiment surveys.

Listen to this episode for a recap of our biggest call of the year...

Or watch my video message - https://players.brightcove.net/6021289101001/VyvCc9BZx_default/index.html?videoId=6374546435112

• First, solid earnings stats are in place as US equity investors wait for the onset of 2Q25 reporting season.
• Second, the latest Business Roundtable survey highlighted weaker corporate vibes relative to March, echoing the tone in last week’s earnings call transcripts to some degree for Russell 3000 companies, where cost containment discussions jumped out to us.
• Third, we recap our views on how we’re thinking about the recent developments in the Middle East from a US equity market perspective.

• First, the conflict in the Middle East comes at a complicated time for the US equity market, as our sentiment and seasonality work has been suggesting stock prices could keep moving up, while our valuation/earnings and GDP analysis has been suggesting that the stock market has gotten ahead of itself. We highlight the three potential challenges we see for the US equity market from this conflict, which we are monitoring closely.
• Second, we revisit our four tiers of fear framework, which helps us map out potential downside in US equities from the conflict, particularly if conditions escalate and broaden out.
• Third, Energy and Materials seem most likely to outperform if the conflict results in a sustained oil price spike, while Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services seem most likely to underperform. We’re also keeping an eye on Utilities and REITs as potential, tactical outperformers.

• First, consensus expectations for 2026 are inching up for S&P 500 EPS in a broad based way, a positive data point for the stock market but a slight one.
• Second, net bulls on the AAII survey have moved up sharply, and formally entered a less robust forward return environment last week.
• Third, the seasonal playbook reminds us that in recent years June and July have tended to be strong for the S&P 500 but that the transition into fall has been tricky with declines often seen in the August – October time frame.

The four big topics covered:

• First, where Lori and Amy see US equity markets and volatility headed. Lori describes herself as neutral and reviews her new YE 2025 S&P 500 target of 5,730, which is driven by her valuation and earnings work and a macro backdrop that looks a bit better than it did in early April, but not as strong as it was in January. Amy highlights how both the right and left tails have gotten fatter recently, and runs through what she sees as the potential catalysts for a pick-up in volatility.
• Second, Amy and Lori's latest thoughts on investor sentiment and positioning. Amy highlights differences in recent behavior from retail investors (who were buying the dip) and institutional investors (who were more cautious and engaged in derisking and degrossing). She points out that hedging on the institutional side has not been short term in nature, due to uncertainty about when the hard data will deteriorate. Meanwhile, Lori notes that many of the investors she speaks with are in a holding pattern, waiting to see what happens next, and walks through a number of key questions that investors will be looking for the answers to in the next reporting season. She also highlights the messiness of recent investor sentiment and positioning data, which fell but never completely collapsed for institutional investors and has been rebounding rapidly after collapsing for retail investors.
• Third, Lori and Amy's thoughts on some of the biggest positioning trades in equities of late. Lori highlights why she sees the tug of war between mega cap Growth and Value continuing, the intersection of the mega cap Growth trade and US exceptionalism, and how tariffs opened a door to curiosity about regions outside the US that will be difficult to close. Meanwhile, Amy highlights increased activity regarding trades on China and Emerging Markets and how she believes that her clients are the most Euro curious she's seen in quite some time.
• Fourth, thoughts regarding the impact of the bond market on US equities. Lori runs through why 5% on 10-year yields would be a stumbling block for US equity market performance, while Amy highlights the potential for the inverse correlation between bonds and equities to break down as a key risk to monitor.

• First, we are modestly revising our YE 2025 S&P 500 price target, taking it up 3% to 5,730 from 5,550. Our valuation and earnings models drive this number.
• Second, we view sentiment as the main risk to our call. Even though it’s been melting up in recent weeks, our sentiment model (based on AAII net bulls) is still the most constructive one in our price target toolkit, and our analysis of S&P 500 moves off the lows of the major post GFC drawdowns indicates that the index could have more room to run through year-end 2025.
• Third, we review the case for and against Small Caps, which were in focus in our meetings last week. We remain neutral as Small Caps have been derisked to a greater degree than Large Caps, making an underweight unwise, but the conditions for outperformance seem elusive.

• First, the S&P 500 EPS backdrop has stabilized, but we still anticipate further downward revisions for 2025 S&P 500 EPS. After a preliminary model refresh, we are maintaining our 2025 S&P 500 EPS forecast of $258, which is below the bottom-up consensus of $265.
• Second, we’ve updated our S&P 500 valuation model to reflect updated RBC house views on key macro variables like interest rates and inflation. It suggests that last week’s gap up in the stock market was largely deserved, but that upside from here may be limited without another major step-up improvement in broader macro expectations.
• Third, we run through our thoughts on the Moody’s US debt downgrade from a US equity market perspective.

• First, it was another week of stabilization on the earnings stats we track, helping to support the recent stabilization in equity market pricing.
• Second, there was a little less conversation about tariffs in last week’s earnings calls, which left some additional room for discussions on the health of the consumer and the impacts of non-tariff policy changes.
• Third, in our other weekly updates, the thing that jumps out is that when we bake in current consensus assumptions on key macro variables and bottom-up EPS for 2025, the S&P 500 ended the week roughly in line with where our model says fair value for the index should be at year-end.

• First, earnings sentiment has stabilized a bit, helping stock prices find some footing for the moment.
• Second, we run through our thoughts on what we learned from last week’s earnings calls. We think there are two different perspectives at play on the consumer, which may be adding to investor confusion. We exited the week seeing managing tariff impacts as a work in progress, but with a greater appreciation of the work that has been done.

• First, earnings sentiment is at an important crossroads, with the rate of upward EPS estimate revisions having fallen to 30%.
• Second, what we read in S&P 500 earnings call transcripts last week keeps us in the camp that recession is not a foregone conclusion, makes us concerned that any adverse impacts from tariffs may be felt a little later in the year or even next year, and pushes us toward the idea that the consumer is holding up but still hasn’t been unscathed.
• Third, the idea that investors are rotating out of the US assets into other geographies is supported by recent funds flows data.

First, the stock market is still experiencing a growth scare, in our view, where it is attempting to stabilize. We see more downside if recession is priced in.

Second, we review how the process of resetting EPS expectations has begun, and run though key themes from the early reporters and companies that have presented at conferences since the Rose Garden. Our overarching takeaway from our reading is that recession is not yet a foregone conclusion but also that US equities are not out of the woods.

Third, we run through our latest thoughts on the Growth trade, which has been outperforming again, and note that it is not a clear cut call.

• First, shortly after midnight on Friday morning, we cut our S&P 500 EPS forecast for 2025 to $258 and our YE 2025 price target to 5,550 – the price target cut was something we’d been telegraphing we’d do if the drawdown in the index broke 10% from peak for quite some time, which it did on Thursday.
• Second, as the stock market has continued to gap down, we’ve continued to highlight our tiers of fear framework for how far US equities could decline in different scenarios. We see the index falling as low as 4,900 if this remains a growth scare, but a drop to 4,200-4,500 is a reasonable way to think about where the index could fall if a recession is priced in.
• Third, our weekly valuation and flows updates provided us with some insight into why US equity markets have been gapping down so severely.

• The team tackles some of the top questions in consumer-related conversations today, including what their company and industry level interactions and data have been telling them about the current state of the consumer, whether the consumer has been retreating or simply shifting their spend, what's happening in different consumer cohorts, what they think the biggest challenges are for the consumer at the moment, and how their companies are managing around tariffs.
• Overall, the team comes to the conclusion that while many of the issues impacting the consumer aren't new, in the aggregate the current set of pressures feels different and conditions appear to have taken a turn for the worse. Nik notes that the tone at a recent industry event was the most downbeat of all of the year's he's been attending and highlights what he believes the incremental pressures are this year. Mike highlights how his proprietary pricing data was particularly weak in February and how weakness in housing has broadened regionally. Steve points out that many issues have been used to explain consumer weakness earlier this year (i.e. weather), but that the slowing that's been underway has persisted even with some of those things now in the rearview mirror.
• On policy, all three noted that their companies have provided very little in the way of guidance related to tariffs, which will likely lead to a tricky reporting season. The team explores whether the companies in their industry will be able to pass along tariff costs via pricing, collectively concluding that it may vary by industry and will be very difficult to do in certain verticals.

• First, trends in investor vibes were mixed last week, both in our quant work as well as last week’s investor conversations.
• Second, the median forward P/E for the S&P 500 has fallen sharply but remains well above average. We’ve also not yet seen significant adjustments to consensus EPS forecasts, which seems likely to keep confidence in P/E analysis low for now.
• Third, Small Caps (which have seen a greater degree of valuation correction) have continued to outperform Large Caps.

• We’ve lowered our YE 2025 S&P 500 price target to 6,200 from 6,600,
• We’ve lowered our 2025 S&P 500 EPS forecast to $264 from $271.
• Among other adjustments, our new price target and EPS forecast embed the updated views of RBC’s Economics and Rates strategy team which were released last week.
• We have updated our year-end 2025 bear case for the S&P 500, which we’ve lowered from 5,775 to 5,550.
• Fourth, some of the vibes we've been tracking are starting to look too extreme to us (in terms of their negativity), but others have more room to go lower.

The big things you need to know: First, we have upgraded Communication Services from market weight to overweight. Second, we are downgrading Health Care to market weight from overweight. Third, we are downgrading Materials from overweight to market weight.

The big things you need to know: First, our YE 2025 S&P 500 price target is 6,600 – that’s our base case; we also run through our bear case of 5,775. Second, sentiment is modestly constructive on a 12 month view but also makes the case for a near-term pullback. Third, we don’t see much room for further P/E expansion but our valuation work still helps us see how stocks can move higher next year. Fourth, US equities may soon lose their appeal relative to bonds. Fifth, the US economy is at an important crossroad from a stock market perspective. And sixth, the political backdrop presents both tailwinds and possible headwinds for stocks.

There are 7 big things you need to know: They focus on the set-up, the historical playbook, bottom-up policy implications per our analyst survey, our thoughts on positioning trades, one tailwind that will manifest regardless of what happens, tail risks, and our rundown of what we’ll be watching on election night and possibly the days beyond.

Three big things you need to know:

First, Friday’s jobs report added to investors’ uncertainty regarding the labor market, but the data point that concerned us from last week was the spike in Tech layoffs in the Challenger report.

Second, election uncertainty has persisted with policy getting greater attention from both sides. We run through our US equity market read throughs from Trump’s economic speech last week.

Third, in our discussion of other updates from our high frequency indicators, we review what we’re watching in terms of potential near-term downside levels for the S&P 500, sentiment, and the Semis trade.

If you’d like to hear more, here’s another 6 minutes. Now, let’s jump into the details.

Starting with Takeaway #1: Employment Uncertainty Has Grown After Friday’s Jobs Report, But The Spike In Tech Layoffs In The Challenger Report Spooked Us The Most Regarding Stocks

• RBC’s economics team noted that while the report “doesn’t point to a sharp contraction in the labor market, it also gave no indications that the broader cooling trend – which is not welcomed by the Federal Reserve – has in any way run its course.”  From our seat in US equity strategy, we generally agree with the idea that the jobs report is still consistent with cooling and normalization as opposed to an economy on the cusp of recession.
• That being said, we were a little spooked by some of the details in the Challenger layoff report that came out earlier in the week. The overall level of layoffs moved up in August, but remained well below the spikes associated with past recessions, and was even a bit below the moves higher seen in 2023-2024 and 2015.
• What caught our attention was the spike in layoffs for Technology companies which wasn’t as bad as those seen in late 2022 and early 2023, but otherwise rivals some of the worst spikes this industry has seen over time. This primarily worries us in regards to the Tech sector itself and the broader market by way of the rotation trade. Though layoff announcements moved up slightly in a few other industries, those were generally mild relative to history.

Moving on to Takeaway #2: Election Uncertainty Persists, With Policy Getting Greater Attention

• We continue to see the US election as a key challenge that the US equity market will need to work through in coming months, due to the uncertainty that the event has injected into the outlook. We do usually see a pullback in the S&P 500 in September and October of Presidential election years, with a rebound afterwards.
• Thinking about today specifically, a number of companies referred to this idea that the election has injected some uncertainty into the outlook in their recent earnings calls.
• Meanwhile, Harris has pulled ahead of Trump in the PredictIt betting market and RCP polling average, but the race still looks quite close on these data sets, as well as in the polling for the swing states.
• We do believe the stock market has been paying attention to the event given the alignment we’ve continued to see between S&P 500 performance and expectations that Trump will win in betting markets.
• One of the primary things the stock market cares about regarding the election is domestic policy, and investors have been getting new information on the policy leanings of both Harris and Trump over the past few weeks. In our latest report, we’ve recapped our early thoughts on the stock market read throughs of Trump’s domestic policy agenda as described in his speech to the Economic Club of New York last week. We think it’s premature to put on any significant sector or industry trades based on the domestic policy ideas being by either candidate, discussed particularly since we expect Congress to be split leaving little room for major news laws. Nevertheless, a few things jumped out to us:
• First, Trump’s linking of a lower corporate tax rate of 15% to domestic production was something we hadn’t heard before, and we confess that we aren’t entirely sure what companies would be eligible for the lower corporate tax rate Trump discussed after Thursday’s speech or how the S&P 500 would be impacted in terms of profitability. If we were to take down the effective tax rate by 6% in our S&P 500 earnings model for 2025, to approximate the Trump proposal, we estimate that our 2025 S&P 500 EPS forecast could rise by more than 7%. After Thursday’s speech, however, we no longer think that’s the right way to think about the math as we suspect different companies, industries, and sectors could be impacted differently.
• Second, Thursday’s speech gave us a better sense of which sectors and industries we should be watching closely from a Trump perspective.
• Industrials and Materials remain obvious ones to monitor given Trump’s attention to the manufacturing economy, rescinding unspent IRA money, and tariffs, which got a lot of attention in the speech.
• Others include Energy - even though we knew this issue was in focus for Trump, we were still surprised by the emphasis on expanding production in his remarks.
• Homebuilders - we found the comments he made on expanding housing affordability and supply interesting given the focus on the issue by Harris recently,
• Tech/AI and Utilities -  we found Trump’s comments on the US needing to dominate AI and the need for more electricity to make it happen noteworthy.
• Health Care also jumped out to us, but because it was barely mentioned throughout the speech, suggesting to us that it’s not a high priority.
• Similarly, even though Financials has tended to be viewed as a Trump trade, it is worth noting that there was also virtually no discussion of this sector that we can recall in his speech on Thursday, aside from the potential link to the broad desire for deregulation.

Tuesday’s debate provides an opportunity for investors to get more insights into both candidates’ domestic policy agendas, but only if the moderators choose to dig in there.

Wrapping up with Takeaway #3: What Else Jumps Out From Our High Frequency Indicators

• The decline in the S&P 500 so far in September of 4.25% is right in line with the five-year average full month return for the index in September, and the full month September decline in the index in 2023.
• If the September pullback in the S&P 500 continues, we’ll be keeping a close eye on the index around the 5,100 level, which would represent a 10% drawdown from the July high and decline in percentage terms similar to what was experienced in Fall 2023 . We see scope for further downside, or at least choppiness, in the near-term given the five big pressures we’ve been highlighting for US equities seasonality, sentiment, the election, the typical market volatility around rate cuts, and rotation. For now, we still think any further damage would be contained within a 10% garden variety pullback range. But if hard landing fears continue to escalate, the risk of a growth scare decline in the 14-20% range, similar to 2010, 2011, 2015-2016, and 2018, will also admittedly rise.
• REITs, Utilities, Staples and Financials are outperforming the most within the S&P 500 so far in 3Q24, followed by Health Care. These represent classic defensive parts of the US equity market, along with a big pocket of cyclical value. Other than the fact that these are natural beneficiaries of the rotation out of mega cap Growth names, two things jump out to us about these sectors.
• First, Financials is an area that has almost always outperformed in the 2nd half of Presidential election years within both Large Cap and Small cap.
• Second, most of these classic defensives (ex REITs) tend to outperform following first Fed rate cuts.
• We were surprised to see that investor sentiment and positioning got even more stretched last week. The four-week average for AAII net bulls rose to 21.5% (barely below the 1 standard deviation mark) after the weekly data point came in at 20.4% (page 30).
• Lastly, we’re keeping an eye out for opportunities in some of the parts of the US equity market that are getting hit hard right now. One of these that we’re watching closely is the Semis & Semi Equipment industry. Despite the pain that’s been inflicted on this space, it still looks problematic on our industry work. Valuations for the median stock in this industry in the Russell 3000 remain elevated, and earnings revisions trends remain negative.

That’s all for now. Thanks for listening. And be sure to reach out to your RBC representative with any questions.

Three big things you need to know: First, while gold prices have had a strong rally this year, having hit record highs last month, we remain cautious. We think that gold is overvalued from the perspective of a number of key macro drivers and that there are some unrealized vulnerabilities to the pillars of gold’s rally. While we are cautious, it’s more because we do not think gold should be at such high levels just yet. Second, while May and June have seen a less weak and more rangebound trend for gold-backed ETPs, we are not convinced that investors are beginning to follow through just yet. Investors sold their gold holdings as prices rallied, and we’ve yet to see a sustained return to buying. Third, central bank demand has been a key pillar to the gold rally but as China’s pause in purchasing showed, there are vulnerabilities. To be clear, we still think that central bank demand will continue to be strong, but there are reasons to be cautious on the volume at record prices and after such a sustained period of strength.

Three big things you need to know: First, in our most recent analysis of global commodity investor flows, we have observed that total commodity investor AUM has started off the year on a weak note. Commodity-linked exchange traded products have continued to decline, led by gold, and commodity index AUM also weakened last month. This has set 2024 up for quite the balancing act, but we remain hopeful.

Second, with gold playing such an outsized role in the weakness dominating commodity AUM, it may be surprising that gold prices have actually held up quite well. We have continued to call out gold’s price resilience, especially in the context of investors having remained on the sidelines. This compared to the gold-positive narrative of eventual rate cuts has left gold itself facing quite the balancing act.

Third, a balancing act that has for the most part not played out in a commodity’s favor so far this year is US natural gas. It has touched lows recently amid weak weather-linked demand, buoyant supplies to date, and general bearish sentiment. We have described it as a commodity that has fallen a bit too far, seemingly waiting for a catalyst, but are recent headlines enough?

Third, two of the charts in focus in our Europe/UK meetings last week included our chart showing how the earnings dominance of the top 7 names in the S&P 500 is fading (which may help spark leadership rotation down the road) and our chart showing how net bullishness on the AAII survey may be heading for a 2-standard deviation event (delaying the pullback we have been anticipating).

need to know: First, with reporting season almost halfway done, bottom-up consensus expectations for EPS growth in 2024 have shrunk to 9% from 11% – a combination of better-than-expected results for 2023 and a modest dampening of enthusiasm for 2024’s outlook. Second, a murky macro backdrop, elevated costs, and China challenges have been in focus in recent earnings calls along with a better monetary policy outlook. Third, in our high frequency indicators, things that caught our attention included the worsening in the sentiment backdrop for stocks last week and mostly positive data regarding the health of the economy and labor market.

Three big things you need to know: First, across the globe most of our analysts are optimistic on performance in the year ahead, with favorable views on the impact of potentially lower interest rates and, to a lesser degree, favorable views on valuations. Second, in the US, the only region where we do formal strategy sector recommendations, we remain overweight Financials, Energy, and Health Care. We downgraded Tech to market weight, upgraded Consumer Discretionary to market weight, and upgraded Utilities to overweight. Third, in Europe, Canada, and Australia our analysts’ top sectors according to the survey varied, but Utilities was among the top sectors in the eyes of our analysts in each.

the podcast, we take a deep dive into the outlook for the US equity market from

the S&P 500 all the way down to Small Caps. Three big things you need to

know: First, we are sticking with our YE2023 S&P 500 price target of 4,250.

Though upside risks remain, downside risks have grown, the outlook has become

cloudier and we don’t think the pause in the S&P 500 rally that we called

for in early August is done yet. Second, we continue to believe that Large Cap

Growth is in need of a tactical correction, but we also acknowledge its

longer-term fundamental appeal which is why we think the leadership transition

has been so tough. Third, Small Caps remain intriguing from a valuation and

earnings perspective, but have been dragged down by balance sheet concerns,

rising bond yields, and lingering economic angst.

Stay tuned for part 2 of our outlook update, which will dig into our thoughts on US vs. non-US equities, Growth vs. Value, and Small Cap.

Three big things you need to know:

• First, in our latest survey, taken in late March and early-April 2023, RBC’s US equity analysts were a little north of neutral in their outlooks for performance over the next 6-12 months.
• Second, on the performance outlook, our analysts were most constructive on Utilities and Health Care, followed by Energy and Tech, with the weakest outlooks for Consumer Staples, Industrials, and Consumer Discretionary.
• Third, the combination of our analysts’ latest views, our ESG Strategy team’s sector scorecard, and our own macro tools keep us overweight Utilities, Health Care, Energy, and Tech, and underweight Consumer Staples and Consumer Discretionary. We have also downgraded Financials to market weight.

• First, according to the latest Duke CFO survey, the C suite was were becoming more optimistic before SVB and was looking ahead of 2024 as a recovery year, while expectations for sources of inflation were dimming.
• Second, things that jumped out from our high-frequency indicators last week include the decline in bond market volatility off highs consistent with past bottoms in the stock market and the stabilization of performance for banks and small caps, which suggest to us that sentiment may be starting to heal. Both are good signals for the stock market.

Ahead of RBC’s Financial Services conference this week, today in the podcast we’re digging into our thoughts on the Financials sector, which we remain overweight. Three big things you need to know: First, Financials has been one of the best performing sectors over the past 6 months. Second, we think the sector is an attractively valued recovery play with a positive shareholder return profile, which history suggests should benefit from a Fed pause. Third, near-term challenges for the sector, and longer-term risks to our view, include the earnings forecast downgrade cycle the sector is in the midst of and the moderation in inflation that our economists continue to anticipate.

If you’d like to hear more, here’s another five minutes. While you’re waiting, a quick reminder that you can subscribe to this podcast on Apple, Spotify, and other major platforms. Now, the details.

• First, layoffs for Tech are spiking, a necessary step in the bottoming process for the stock market, while industrial layoffs remain low, supporting the soft landing thesis.
• Second, as we combed through the earnings data, a case for stocks may be starting to emerge on 2024 EPS.
• Third, we review what jumped out the most on our high frequency indicators last week in terms of sentiment, valuation, and performance, which generally supports the soft landing thesis and suggest that last week’s strong move in US equities was justified.

the podcast, we reflect on hot topics and some of the most interesting things we saw and heard last week. Three big things you need to know: First, we revisited the international revenue exposure of the major US indices and sectors. The data suggests to us that as long as the stronger US Dollar is a problem for US companies, that Small Caps and Large Cap Value are the best places to be. Second, with more than half of S&P 500 results in, the softening in the EPS-related stats that we track has become more significant, though we still think there’s another round of clean-up to forecasts that will need to happen in early 2023. Third, sentiment on the growth trade and the new economy has been deeply pessimistic, but it’s been even worse in Small Caps and the old economy.

the podcast, we reflect on hot topics and some of the most interesting things we saw and heard last week. Three big things you need to know: First, we received several questions about how Small Caps look from a balance sheet perspective. The short answer is: worse than Large Cap given shorter maturities and less exposure to fixed rate debt. This is admittedly a risk to our Small Cap overweight, but we are sticking with our call. Second, beat rates and EPS growth expectations have continued to soften now that 3Q22 reporting season is in full swing, as has the tone in company commentary. Third, midterm election developments continue to trend in a stock market friendly way. Republicans have pulled well ahead of Democrats in the generic Congressional ballot and are also now expected to take the Senate in betting markets.

Today in our 6:15 minute podcast, we discuss the factors impacting US natural gas prices this year and beyond. Natural gas prices generally are attracting far more attention amid headlines of energy prices broadly, inflation worries and economic concerns, and even energy crises that have in many ways held outsized interest in the market. While global gas prices remain on another level, US gas prices also reached very high levels earlier this year, and even after some recent developments, they still remain quite elevated.

We cover three main themes in this episode. First, geopolitical premiums are now present in US natural gas markets in a way they were not before. We draw on both an analysis we did earlier this summer as well as some learnings after an explosion that shut down a major US facility early last month. This leads us to our second point - our view for the remainder of this year. We think gas prices should average north of $6/MMBtu in the US, a view that previously was our high scenario, and now looks like the more probable one for the remainder of the year. Third, in all of our scenarios US gas prices fall next year. While we are by no means returning to the lower-for-longer price environment many had gotten used to, we do expect lower gas prices in 2023 as production comes online and there is less structural growth on the other side of the balance y/y, albeit with the caveat that geopolitics are here to stay for US natural gas.

Today in our 11:30 minute podcast, we discuss the recent oil price volatility and explore the dynamic between the push and pull between the looming threat of a recession which is being stacked up against the strongest fundamental oil market set up in decades, or maybe even ever.

Three things to know: First, given the recent price rout, the financial oil market is dislocating dramatically from an extremely tight spot physical market. Near record Atlantic Basin physical pricing differentials, the Saudi hike to Official Selling Prices (OSPs) and the CPC pipeline outage are indicative that the steadfast physical market is telling a diametrically opposed story to the plunging paper market. The physical market is pricing in scarcity while the financial market is pricing in recession.

Second, despite the recent plunge in oil prices, term structure remains relatively intact, surprisingly. This means that the term portion of the curve is also retracing significantly lower. Unless the recession is deep and protracted, we believe that the dated calendar strips are largely undervalued. However, the near term recessionary risks must be respected. In a recessionary scenario in which demand is impacted at a similar rate as previous downturns, we could see a scenario in which spot prices retreat into the mid $70/bbl range in the back half of this year. Now, we only place a 15% probability to such an outcome, but we have all been doing this long enough to know that oil price moves can be swift, violent and unforgiving, in both directions. The bullish conviction is high, but sentiment is soft among the commodity trading community.

Third, while the debate regarding the health of the consumer remains an open ended question, large scale demand destruction is rare. Over the past 30 years leading into the pandemic, there were 39 individual months in which retail gasoline prices increased by more than 30%, YoY. Of those instances, we have seen gasoline demand fall by 2% or more on only 12 of those occasions. And five of those instances took place during the 2008 Great Financial Crisis. In short, protracted demand destruction events have historically been rare, absent a recession. That said, the strength of the US dollar means that oil priced in local currencies is still punching in either at or near all-time record highs for many regions across the globe.

latest thoughts on economic expectations, sentiment, and valuations. The big

things you need to know: First, the S&P 500 is still trading as though it’s

experiencing a growth scare, a framework that has been pointing to downside in

the S&P 500 to ~3,850. Current trends in economic forecasts continue to

support the idea that this is the right way to think about how far stocks

should fall. Second, institutional investor sentiment has made significant

progress catching down to retail investor sentiment, with overall US equity

futures positioning among asset managers now below 2020 & Great Financial

Crisis lows, and getting close to 2011 and 2015/2016 lows – something that

makes the case for a bottoming in stocks relatively soon if recession fears can

be kept at bay. Third, while valuations aren’t yet a reason to buy US equities

on their own, they are no longer a problem for the market as a whole.