<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://feeds.captivate.fm/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"><channel><atom:link href="https://feeds.captivate.fm/savecountry/collection" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><title><![CDATA[(un) Safe Country - (не)Безпечна Країна]]></title><podcast:guid>d21daa25-b48c-54bd-bf2d-749939d2d35d</podcast:guid><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 13:55:15 +0000</lastBuildDate><generator>Captivate.fm</generator><language><![CDATA[uk]]></language><copyright><![CDATA[Copyright 2025 Українська правда]]></copyright><managingEditor>Українська правда</managingEditor><itunes:summary><![CDATA[(Un)Safe Country is a joint podcast of the Centre for Defence Strategies,  Media Centre Ukraine and Ukrayinska Pravda. The host of the podcast, Alina Frolova, is a diplomat with a degree in geopolitics. She worked as a Deputy Minister of Defence. She coordinated cooperation with partners and NATO. 

She was involved in reforms in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. She was responsible for the security of the Black Sea and took an active part in the establishment of the Crimea Platform. 

She is currently one of the leaders of the Centre for Defence Strategies. In the podcast, she will invite interesting interlocutors, military and civilian, experts and volunteers, Ukrainian and foreign, with whom she will discuss security issues and how to bring victory in the war with Russia closer.
(не)Безпечна країна – це спільний подкаст Центру оборонних стратегій, Медіа Центру "Україна" та Української правди.

Ведуча подкасту Аліна Фролова – дипломат, отримала спеціалізацію з геополітики. Працювала заступником міністра оборони. Координувала співпрацю з партнерами та НАТО. Долучалася до реформ у Збройних силах України. Опікувалася безпекою Чорного моря та брала активну участь у заснуванні Кримської платформи. На даний момент є одним з лідерів Центру оборонних стратегій.

У подкасті вона буде запрошувати цікавих співрозмовників, військових та цивільних, експертів та волонтерів, українських та іноземних, з якими буде говорити про безпекові питання та про те, як скоріше наблизити перемогу у війні з Росією.

Фото для обкладинки: Денис Антіпов
Ведуча подкасту Аліна Фролова – дипломат, отримала спеціалізацію з геополітики. Працювала заступником міністра оборони. Координувала співпрацю з партнерами та НАТО. Долучалася до реформ у Збройних силах України. Опікувалася безпекою Чорного моря та брала активну участь у заснуванні Кримської платформи. На даний момент є одним з лідерів Центру оборонних стратегій. 
У подкасті вона буде запрошувати цікавих співрозмовників, військових та цивільних, експертів та волонтерів, українських та іноземних, з якими буде говорити про безпекові питання та про те, як скоріше наблизити перемогу у війні з Росією.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><itunes:owner><itunes:name>Українська правда</itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author><description>(Un)Safe Country is a joint podcast of the Centre for Defence Strategies,  Media Centre Ukraine and Ukrayinska Pravda. The host of the podcast, Alina Frolova, is a diplomat with a degree in geopolitics. She worked as a Deputy Minister of Defence. She coordinated cooperation with partners and NATO. 

She was involved in reforms in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. She was responsible for the security of the Black Sea and took an active part in the establishment of the Crimea Platform. 

She is currently one of the leaders of the Centre for Defence Strategies. In the podcast, she will invite interesting interlocutors, military and civilian, experts and volunteers, Ukrainian and foreign, with whom she will discuss security issues and how to bring victory in the war with Russia closer.
(не)Безпечна країна – це спільний подкаст Центру оборонних стратегій, Медіа Центру &quot;Україна&quot; та Української правди.

Ведуча подкасту Аліна Фролова – дипломат, отримала спеціалізацію з геополітики. Працювала заступником міністра оборони. Координувала співпрацю з партнерами та НАТО. Долучалася до реформ у Збройних силах України. Опікувалася безпекою Чорного моря та брала активну участь у заснуванні Кримської платформи. На даний момент є одним з лідерів Центру оборонних стратегій.

У подкасті вона буде запрошувати цікавих співрозмовників, військових та цивільних, експертів та волонтерів, українських та іноземних, з якими буде говорити про безпекові питання та про те, як скоріше наблизити перемогу у війні з Росією.

Фото для обкладинки: Денис Антіпов
Ведуча подкасту Аліна Фролова – дипломат, отримала спеціалізацію з геополітики. Працювала заступником міністра оборони. Координувала співпрацю з партнерами та НАТО. Долучалася до реформ у Збройних силах України. Опікувалася безпекою Чорного моря та брала активну участь у заснуванні Кримської платформи. На даний момент є одним з лідерів Центру оборонних стратегій. 
У подкасті вона буде запрошувати цікавих співрозмовників, військових та цивільних, експертів та волонтерів, українських та іноземних, з якими буде говорити про безпекові питання та про те, як скоріше наблизити перемогу у війні з Росією.</description><link>https://savecountry.captivate.fm</link><atom:link href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" rel="hub"/><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><itunes:category text="News"></itunes:category><itunes:category text="News"><itunes:category text="Politics"/></itunes:category><podcast:locked>no</podcast:locked><podcast:medium>podcast</podcast:medium><item><title>Michael Kofman: &quot;Worst-case scenario didn&apos;t come true, but in 2025 Ukraine is in a difficult situation&quot;</title><itunes:title>Michael Kofman: &quot;Worst-case scenario didn&apos;t come true, but in 2025 Ukraine is in a difficult situation&quot;</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>“The worst-case scenarios for 2024 didn't take place, the front didn't collapse. There wasn't a major Russian breakthrough anywhere along the front line. The Russian military wasn't able to take any of the most significant cities. Some of the Russian offensive like the Kharkiv offensive, failed visibly. We still don't know how the winter will turn out. And looking at Ukrainian critical infrastructure because there's still quite a bit of winter to go. But so far, it's also not been the worst-case scenario when we look at the damage Russia inflicted on Ukraine's power generation capacity.</p><p>On the other hand, I do think that the year very much went in the wrong direction. And I think the war's been on a negative trajectory since about the fall of 2023, to be honest with you. I think the best-case scenarios didn't take place either,” said the guest of the new episode of the (Un)Safe Country podcast.</p><p>“Ukraine was able to hold Russia to incremental gains last year. Ukraine had a tactically successful offensive in Kursk, although I think the potential operational gains, or even perhaps more strategic benefits of that offensive, had not been realized. And we can circle back to that topic if you like.</p><p>But I think we're entering 2025 with Ukraine in a very difficult position. There are some very glaring structural issues in terms of Ukraine's manpower, mobilization, and force management decisions that were made last year, that could have been a lot better. And if we look at the overall funding situation and prospects for sustained Western support, Ukraine certainly faces an uncertain future this year.”</p><p>What scenarios might unfold in Ukraine in 2025, and which of last year's forecasts have come true?</p><p>In the new episode of (un)Safe Country podcast, its permanent host Alina Frolova speaks with a military analyst Michael Kofman, senior fellow at the Russia and Eurasia Program of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The conversation covers the current situation in Ukraine and the state of the Russian military, potential negotiations, Moskov’s position and security guarantees for Ukraine, the economic situation in Russia and its impact on ending the war, as well as possible scenarios for 2025.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The worst-case scenarios for 2024 didn't take place, the front didn't collapse. There wasn't a major Russian breakthrough anywhere along the front line. The Russian military wasn't able to take any of the most significant cities. Some of the Russian offensive like the Kharkiv offensive, failed visibly. We still don't know how the winter will turn out. And looking at Ukrainian critical infrastructure because there's still quite a bit of winter to go. But so far, it's also not been the worst-case scenario when we look at the damage Russia inflicted on Ukraine's power generation capacity.</p><p>On the other hand, I do think that the year very much went in the wrong direction. And I think the war's been on a negative trajectory since about the fall of 2023, to be honest with you. I think the best-case scenarios didn't take place either,” said the guest of the new episode of the (Un)Safe Country podcast.</p><p>“Ukraine was able to hold Russia to incremental gains last year. Ukraine had a tactically successful offensive in Kursk, although I think the potential operational gains, or even perhaps more strategic benefits of that offensive, had not been realized. And we can circle back to that topic if you like.</p><p>But I think we're entering 2025 with Ukraine in a very difficult position. There are some very glaring structural issues in terms of Ukraine's manpower, mobilization, and force management decisions that were made last year, that could have been a lot better. And if we look at the overall funding situation and prospects for sustained Western support, Ukraine certainly faces an uncertain future this year.”</p><p>What scenarios might unfold in Ukraine in 2025, and which of last year's forecasts have come true?</p><p>In the new episode of (un)Safe Country podcast, its permanent host Alina Frolova speaks with a military analyst Michael Kofman, senior fellow at the Russia and Eurasia Program of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The conversation covers the current situation in Ukraine and the state of the Russian military, potential negotiations, Moskov’s position and security guarantees for Ukraine, the economic situation in Russia and its impact on ending the war, as well as possible scenarios for 2025.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">f2f4006c-1ff9-4cdf-9543-e61d03388b08</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2025 21:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/7dc27b84-2c3d-47cf-9f11-425d76ba6ad1/NBK-256-0213.mp3" length="91972685" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>47:54</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>56</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>56</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>Ambassador Herbst: &quot;Russians believe Trump can impose peace on Ukraine in favour of Putin&quot;</title><itunes:title>Ambassador Herbst: &quot;Russians believe Trump can impose peace on Ukraine in favour of Putin&quot;</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>"Russians greeted Trump's victory with great enthusiasm. They think that because there are people around Trump who are naive about Russia's threat to the United States, Trump will be willing to impose a peace that enables Putin to take political control of Ukraine. And so he's testing that hypothesis right now by showing no compromise. I think that the Trump team made a mistake when they criticised Biden's decision to allow Ukraine to use American weapons on Russian territory. That convinces Putin that he's right about Trump being willing to give up Ukraine. The Trump team also made a mistake when they criticised Ukraine for taking out the lieutenant general responsible for use of chemical weapons, not only in Ukraine, but in Syria. But then the Trump team also did something, I'd say, somewhat positive when they criticised Moscow's Christmas bombing of Ukraine, although they phrased it in a way that could have been stronger," said the guest of the new episode of the "(un)Safe Country" podcast.</p><p>"So, the Russians are looking at these signs and drawing, unfortunately, positive conclusions for them. And those conclusions are also not very good for Trump because Trump does not want to impose a peace which allows Putin to take over. That would demonstrate that Trump is weak and has been taken advantage of by Putin. For those reasons, I say, is Trump's desire to have a real achievement that demonstrates strength. The Russians will ultimately have to compromise. But they haven't realised that yet."</p><p>What are the elements of Trump's proposed potential agreement for Ukraine and Russia, and what leverage can the US president-elect use with both sides?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(un)Safe Country" podcast, its permanent host, Alina Frolova, talks to Ambassador John Herbst, Director of the Atlantic Council's Eurasia Centre and former US Ambassador to Ukraine. The conversation is about Trump's position on ending the war in Ukraine and what could be a beneficial deal with Russia for him, about the critical mistakes of the Biden administration and Trump's ability to correct them, about the role of the US in the international arena shortly, about possible US attention to China, about how strong and important the European voice will be for Trump and which European leaders he might hear, as well as about possible scenarios for 2025, including for Ukraine.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Russians greeted Trump's victory with great enthusiasm. They think that because there are people around Trump who are naive about Russia's threat to the United States, Trump will be willing to impose a peace that enables Putin to take political control of Ukraine. And so he's testing that hypothesis right now by showing no compromise. I think that the Trump team made a mistake when they criticised Biden's decision to allow Ukraine to use American weapons on Russian territory. That convinces Putin that he's right about Trump being willing to give up Ukraine. The Trump team also made a mistake when they criticised Ukraine for taking out the lieutenant general responsible for use of chemical weapons, not only in Ukraine, but in Syria. But then the Trump team also did something, I'd say, somewhat positive when they criticised Moscow's Christmas bombing of Ukraine, although they phrased it in a way that could have been stronger," said the guest of the new episode of the "(un)Safe Country" podcast.</p><p>"So, the Russians are looking at these signs and drawing, unfortunately, positive conclusions for them. And those conclusions are also not very good for Trump because Trump does not want to impose a peace which allows Putin to take over. That would demonstrate that Trump is weak and has been taken advantage of by Putin. For those reasons, I say, is Trump's desire to have a real achievement that demonstrates strength. The Russians will ultimately have to compromise. But they haven't realised that yet."</p><p>What are the elements of Trump's proposed potential agreement for Ukraine and Russia, and what leverage can the US president-elect use with both sides?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(un)Safe Country" podcast, its permanent host, Alina Frolova, talks to Ambassador John Herbst, Director of the Atlantic Council's Eurasia Centre and former US Ambassador to Ukraine. The conversation is about Trump's position on ending the war in Ukraine and what could be a beneficial deal with Russia for him, about the critical mistakes of the Biden administration and Trump's ability to correct them, about the role of the US in the international arena shortly, about possible US attention to China, about how strong and important the European voice will be for Trump and which European leaders he might hear, as well as about possible scenarios for 2025, including for Ukraine.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">3dfcd79c-8d67-4c87-9d44-2a8826b61d51</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/856ec3f6-8559-4731-9814-f9c20d0059ba/NBK-275-0114-EN.mp3" length="80059418" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>41:42</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>55</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>55</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>George Scutaru: &quot;Maia Sandu&apos;s victory did not defeat Russia&apos;s attempts to destabilise Moldova&quot;</title><itunes:title>George Scutaru: &quot;Maia Sandu&apos;s victory did not defeat Russia&apos;s attempts to destabilise Moldova&quot;</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>“In Moldova, we've seen one of the largest operations conducted by FSB and criminal structure with support FSB, GRU, and others. They try to bribe votes, trying to buy more than 150,000 voters against the referendum two weeks ago and now against Maia Sandu, especially for the second round. Maia Sandu's victory in the presidential elections does not mark a complete defeat of Russia's attempts to destabilize the country. Because the next year's election will offer Russia a new opportunity to undermine Moldova's pro-European trajectory. And establish a parliamentary majority capable of obstructing the reform process initiated by President Maia Sandu and the pro-European government”, says the guest of the new episode of the (un)Safe Country podcast.</p><p>“In my opinion, Russia may attempt to replicate the situation seen in Georgia because you mentioned, Alina, also what's happening in Georgia. Where the pro-Western president, Salome Zurabishvili, has been politically isolated while the government and its parliamentary majority pass controversial legislation on human rights and practically slow down reforms and engage in conflict with the EU and the US. Practically without resorting to military intervention, Russia has effectively stalled Georgia's progress towards EU integration. And achieved a significant strategic victory in this confrontation with the Western democratic world.&nbsp;</p><p>Coming back to Moldova for the ruling Party of Action and Solidarity, Maia Sandu's party. The main challenge will not only to secure a victory in parliamentary elections but more critically to form a parliamentary majority. And to avoid being isolated by the rest of other parties”.&nbsp;</p><p>In a new episode of the (un)Safe Country podcast, its permanent host, Alina Frolova, talks to George Scutaru, founder and executive director of the leading Romanian think tank New Strategy Center and former national security adviser to the Romanian president.</p><p>The conversation is about the referendum and presidential elections in Moldova that have already taken place and the parliamentary elections to be held next year, possible scenarios of Russian influence in the region, the United States and Trump's potential policy as president, the upcoming elections in Romania, and the position on supporting Ukraine.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“In Moldova, we've seen one of the largest operations conducted by FSB and criminal structure with support FSB, GRU, and others. They try to bribe votes, trying to buy more than 150,000 voters against the referendum two weeks ago and now against Maia Sandu, especially for the second round. Maia Sandu's victory in the presidential elections does not mark a complete defeat of Russia's attempts to destabilize the country. Because the next year's election will offer Russia a new opportunity to undermine Moldova's pro-European trajectory. And establish a parliamentary majority capable of obstructing the reform process initiated by President Maia Sandu and the pro-European government”, says the guest of the new episode of the (un)Safe Country podcast.</p><p>“In my opinion, Russia may attempt to replicate the situation seen in Georgia because you mentioned, Alina, also what's happening in Georgia. Where the pro-Western president, Salome Zurabishvili, has been politically isolated while the government and its parliamentary majority pass controversial legislation on human rights and practically slow down reforms and engage in conflict with the EU and the US. Practically without resorting to military intervention, Russia has effectively stalled Georgia's progress towards EU integration. And achieved a significant strategic victory in this confrontation with the Western democratic world.&nbsp;</p><p>Coming back to Moldova for the ruling Party of Action and Solidarity, Maia Sandu's party. The main challenge will not only to secure a victory in parliamentary elections but more critically to form a parliamentary majority. And to avoid being isolated by the rest of other parties”.&nbsp;</p><p>In a new episode of the (un)Safe Country podcast, its permanent host, Alina Frolova, talks to George Scutaru, founder and executive director of the leading Romanian think tank New Strategy Center and former national security adviser to the Romanian president.</p><p>The conversation is about the referendum and presidential elections in Moldova that have already taken place and the parliamentary elections to be held next year, possible scenarios of Russian influence in the region, the United States and Trump's potential policy as president, the upcoming elections in Romania, and the position on supporting Ukraine.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">8749a095-61b5-4171-a374-9835afe29923</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/aa356b14-af88-4095-b858-96a0e1e25c99/NBK-250-1113-EN.mp3" length="67513034" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>35:09</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>50</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>50</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>William Taylor: &quot;The US does not see the events in Ukraine as a prelude to World War III&quot;</title><itunes:title>William Taylor: &quot;The US does not see the events in Ukraine as a prelude to World War III&quot;</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>“The view from the United States is that this is not a prelude to World War III. The view from the United States is that Ukraine is defending itself from an invasion, an unprovoked aggression attack from Russia. And for nine hundred and sixty one days, Ukraine has held off the Russians. We are very pleased that we've been able to support Ukraine and assist Ukraine in holding off the Russians for nine hundred and sixty one days. Because we see this not as World War III. We see this as Ukraine defending, sadly on Ukrainian soil, the rest of Europe from this aggression from the Russians. The Russians have attacked Ukraine. They have not yet attacked NATO or any NATO ally. This is a war of Russia against Ukraine, and we are supporting Ukraine in its fight. And President Biden has made it clear in the past month that our goal is for Ukraine to win. And that's important to us, it is obviously important to Ukraine, and it is important for the rest of Europe. So this is why we are supporting Ukraine. It's not a broader world war. It is a defence of Ukraine of a nation's sovereignty and independence. And that's what we want to maintain.”</p><p>What is the situation in Ukraine from the point of view of the United States and American policy, and is the world currently on the brink of World War III?</p><p><br></p><p>In a new episode of the "(un)Safe Country" podcast, its host Alina Frolova talked to William Taylor, former US Ambassador to Ukraine and Vice President of the Center for Europe and Russia at the United States Institute of Peace. The conversation was about the US position on the war in Ukraine unleashed by Russia, the upcoming US elections and the candidates' strategies for the war in Ukraine, the possibility of inviting Ukraine to NATO, ways to establish peace, America's perception of Russia and lessons learned from mistakes, and the US support for Ukraine.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The view from the United States is that this is not a prelude to World War III. The view from the United States is that Ukraine is defending itself from an invasion, an unprovoked aggression attack from Russia. And for nine hundred and sixty one days, Ukraine has held off the Russians. We are very pleased that we've been able to support Ukraine and assist Ukraine in holding off the Russians for nine hundred and sixty one days. Because we see this not as World War III. We see this as Ukraine defending, sadly on Ukrainian soil, the rest of Europe from this aggression from the Russians. The Russians have attacked Ukraine. They have not yet attacked NATO or any NATO ally. This is a war of Russia against Ukraine, and we are supporting Ukraine in its fight. And President Biden has made it clear in the past month that our goal is for Ukraine to win. And that's important to us, it is obviously important to Ukraine, and it is important for the rest of Europe. So this is why we are supporting Ukraine. It's not a broader world war. It is a defence of Ukraine of a nation's sovereignty and independence. And that's what we want to maintain.”</p><p>What is the situation in Ukraine from the point of view of the United States and American policy, and is the world currently on the brink of World War III?</p><p><br></p><p>In a new episode of the "(un)Safe Country" podcast, its host Alina Frolova talked to William Taylor, former US Ambassador to Ukraine and Vice President of the Center for Europe and Russia at the United States Institute of Peace. The conversation was about the US position on the war in Ukraine unleashed by Russia, the upcoming US elections and the candidates' strategies for the war in Ukraine, the possibility of inviting Ukraine to NATO, ways to establish peace, America's perception of Russia and lessons learned from mistakes, and the US support for Ukraine.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">f5b92335-80d3-4ad3-aadc-9a6858f598dc</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/c53f7771-25a8-4bbc-8914-1d8702cd08d4/NBK-247-1023-EN.mp3" length="71371794" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>37:10</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>49</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>49</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>Andrzej Falkowski: Ukraine ranks 15th in the world in terms of military power</title><itunes:title>Andrzej Falkowski: Ukraine ranks 15th in the world in terms of military power</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>"I always show my colleagues statistics related to global firepower. It is a very interesting statistic. It takes into account sixty different factors. It objectifies the overall picture of the country's position. And this picture shows that Ukraine ranks 15th in the world in terms of military power. Poland is 20th. Germany, surprise surprise, is in 25th place. So, if Ukraine were to join NATO now, you would be behind only the United States, the United Kingdom, France, the NATO nuclear powers, Turkey and Italy. Ukraine would be in sixth place. We would be behind you. Look at the statistics. It also includes some economic factors, such as gross domestic product, population, possibility of economic recovery, and so on and so forth. Sixty different factors, and you're in 15th place."</p><p>What role does Ukraine's experience and military capabilities play in NATO membership? And what should Ukraine do to finally overcome any scepticism or doubts about joining NATO?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast, its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Andrzej Falkowski, PhD in Economics, Lieutenant General of the Reserve Armed Forces of the Republic of Poland, Strategic Advisor to the Ministry of Defence in 2018, about reforms in Ukraine, the Vilnius decision, the effectiveness and capability of the Ukrainian armed forces, the US elections, and support for Ukraine.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I always show my colleagues statistics related to global firepower. It is a very interesting statistic. It takes into account sixty different factors. It objectifies the overall picture of the country's position. And this picture shows that Ukraine ranks 15th in the world in terms of military power. Poland is 20th. Germany, surprise surprise, is in 25th place. So, if Ukraine were to join NATO now, you would be behind only the United States, the United Kingdom, France, the NATO nuclear powers, Turkey and Italy. Ukraine would be in sixth place. We would be behind you. Look at the statistics. It also includes some economic factors, such as gross domestic product, population, possibility of economic recovery, and so on and so forth. Sixty different factors, and you're in 15th place."</p><p>What role does Ukraine's experience and military capabilities play in NATO membership? And what should Ukraine do to finally overcome any scepticism or doubts about joining NATO?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast, its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Andrzej Falkowski, PhD in Economics, Lieutenant General of the Reserve Armed Forces of the Republic of Poland, Strategic Advisor to the Ministry of Defence in 2018, about reforms in Ukraine, the Vilnius decision, the effectiveness and capability of the Ukrainian armed forces, the US elections, and support for Ukraine.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">70c2af0e-69e8-4c74-804f-43a84e02d732</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/f4800094-16ad-4180-824e-642191bd5933/NBK-219-1309-converted.mp3" length="76486710" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>39:53</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>19</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>76% of refugees and 82% of internally displaced Ukrainians intend to return home - Karen Whiting</title><itunes:title>76% of refugees and 82% of internally displaced Ukrainians intend to return home - Karen Whiting</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>"As for the different intentions of refugees and internally displaced persons, I think they are quite similar. 76% of refugees and 82% of internally displaced Ukrainians intend to return home. And about 15% of both refugees and internally displaced Ukrainians say they want to return home within the next three months. This percentage remains relatively stable throughout 2022 and 2023."</p><p>What is the decisive factor for refugees to return home and what actions is UNHCR taking to support the government in creating conditions for the return of Ukrainian citizens?</p><p>In the new episode of the podcast "(Un)Safe Country", its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Karen Whiting, Deputy Representative of the UN Refugee Agency in Ukraine. The conversation is about refugees and internally displaced persons, their lives, adaptation, plans for the future, and what Ukraine and the world should do to make sure these people return.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"As for the different intentions of refugees and internally displaced persons, I think they are quite similar. 76% of refugees and 82% of internally displaced Ukrainians intend to return home. And about 15% of both refugees and internally displaced Ukrainians say they want to return home within the next three months. This percentage remains relatively stable throughout 2022 and 2023."</p><p>What is the decisive factor for refugees to return home and what actions is UNHCR taking to support the government in creating conditions for the return of Ukrainian citizens?</p><p>In the new episode of the podcast "(Un)Safe Country", its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Karen Whiting, Deputy Representative of the UN Refugee Agency in Ukraine. The conversation is about refugees and internally displaced persons, their lives, adaptation, plans for the future, and what Ukraine and the world should do to make sure these people return.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">84ca92aa-06b8-40bc-855c-f7a4ae364b0c</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/b3baf3f9-391b-48df-93b9-1f43bda764e4/NBK-216-1608-ENG-converted.mp3" length="73460033" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>38:18</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>16</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>John Spencer: &quot;The Battle of Kyiv is the most decisive battle of the modern era since the end of World War II&quot;</title><itunes:title>John Spencer: &quot;The Battle of Kyiv is the most decisive battle of the modern era since the end of World War II&quot;</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>"Russia in February in the full scale invasion wanted to take Ukraine, wanted to remove the Ukraine's government and its autonomy, wanted to recolonize it back into the Russian Federation. It is instead of stated the strategic goal. Ukraine's strategic goal was to survive as an independent democratic self-determined nation. So that one battle although all the battles mountain. So the battle of Chernihiv, the battle of Sumy, the battle of Mariupol, they all mattered but the decisive battle was the battle of Kyiv. So once Russia lost and withdrew, got defeated and surrendered on April 3rd, that was it. The war of Ukraine has been won, although the fighting is going to continue because all of Ukraine is Ukraine, but the fight for Ukraine as a democratic nation, as its own nation in its identity… Russia lost that"</p><p>What exactly do Ukrainians need to change in the defense of cities and what do civilians have to know in order to resist the enemy as effectively as possible in urban warfare?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast with its irreplaceable host Alina Frolova, we talk about military strategy, battles in cities and towns, and what Ukraine needs to change to better defend them, as well as the battle for Kyiv, the counteroffensive, Crimea, and nuclear weapons. We talk about all this with John Spencer, a professor, writer, combat veteran, and internationally recognized expert on urban warfare.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Russia in February in the full scale invasion wanted to take Ukraine, wanted to remove the Ukraine's government and its autonomy, wanted to recolonize it back into the Russian Federation. It is instead of stated the strategic goal. Ukraine's strategic goal was to survive as an independent democratic self-determined nation. So that one battle although all the battles mountain. So the battle of Chernihiv, the battle of Sumy, the battle of Mariupol, they all mattered but the decisive battle was the battle of Kyiv. So once Russia lost and withdrew, got defeated and surrendered on April 3rd, that was it. The war of Ukraine has been won, although the fighting is going to continue because all of Ukraine is Ukraine, but the fight for Ukraine as a democratic nation, as its own nation in its identity… Russia lost that"</p><p>What exactly do Ukrainians need to change in the defense of cities and what do civilians have to know in order to resist the enemy as effectively as possible in urban warfare?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast with its irreplaceable host Alina Frolova, we talk about military strategy, battles in cities and towns, and what Ukraine needs to change to better defend them, as well as the battle for Kyiv, the counteroffensive, Crimea, and nuclear weapons. We talk about all this with John Spencer, a professor, writer, combat veteran, and internationally recognized expert on urban warfare.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">4ffc7521-f8d6-42a8-b35c-a1d3ddad9ddb</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/d77b3c86-4f1b-4b43-9683-2b28d7ef127e/NBK-214-2607-ENG-converted.mp3" length="110501468" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>57:37</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>14</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>Peter Pomerantsev: &quot;Russia&apos;s obsession with manipulating information is both its strength and flaw&quot;</title><itunes:title>Peter Pomerantsev: &quot;Russia&apos;s obsession with manipulating information is both its strength and flaw&quot;</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>"They never consider information as something of value in itself. They don't believe in communication between people because they don't think people are capable of analyzing and making decisions. They see people as a passive mass that can be manipulated. And in a sense, that means that they invest a lot of money in information warfare, but maybe that's their Achilles' heel. So I think that the fact that Russian propaganda is so concerned with information is its strength, but also its flaw."</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast, its irreplaceable host Alina Frolova  has a conversation with Peter Pomerantsev, a British journalist, one of the most prominent figures in Western countries who speaks about propaganda and researches russia. We talk about information and how it affects war, about Ukraine's ability to respond democratically to the russian information warfare machine and ideology, about how democracies can convince the masses, about information Rammstein and journalistic ethics in times of war.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"They never consider information as something of value in itself. They don't believe in communication between people because they don't think people are capable of analyzing and making decisions. They see people as a passive mass that can be manipulated. And in a sense, that means that they invest a lot of money in information warfare, but maybe that's their Achilles' heel. So I think that the fact that Russian propaganda is so concerned with information is its strength, but also its flaw."</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast, its irreplaceable host Alina Frolova  has a conversation with Peter Pomerantsev, a British journalist, one of the most prominent figures in Western countries who speaks about propaganda and researches russia. We talk about information and how it affects war, about Ukraine's ability to respond democratically to the russian information warfare machine and ideology, about how democracies can convince the masses, about information Rammstein and journalistic ethics in times of war.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">06e17e82-b480-4f65-a92a-844d27512a57</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/2a32fd30-d2aa-4396-ab96-147e0208b803/NBK-213-2007-ENG-converted.mp3" length="96184558" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>50:09</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>13</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>Stephen Gethins: &quot;Putin is the worst strategist in the world at the moment. All of his strategic goals have failed. NATO is stronger, Ukraine&apos;s resolve is stronger.&quot;</title><itunes:title>Stephen Gethins: &quot;Putin is the worst strategist in the world at the moment. All of his strategic goals have failed. NATO is stronger, Ukraine&apos;s resolve is stronger.&quot;</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>As for Russia's warfare strategy, it is known for being brutal, maximalist, a strategy that they have recently honed in Syria. It has bombarded Ukraine with missiles and artillery on a scale unseen in Europe for decades, hitting civilian objects from apartment buildings and theaters to schools and hospitals, resulting in the deaths of 6,919 civilians, according to the UN Human Rights Office, between 2022 and January 2023.</p><p>How does the situation on the front line now resemble World War I and why would Russia's war strategy not have been swift and overwhelming from the start?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast, we talk about international relations, war strategies of the past and present, and peace with Hugh Strong, Professor of International Relations at the University of St. Andrews, Stephen Gethins, Practitioner Professor at the School of International Relations, and Sevgil Musayeva, Editor-in-Chief of Ukrainska Pravda.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for Russia's warfare strategy, it is known for being brutal, maximalist, a strategy that they have recently honed in Syria. It has bombarded Ukraine with missiles and artillery on a scale unseen in Europe for decades, hitting civilian objects from apartment buildings and theaters to schools and hospitals, resulting in the deaths of 6,919 civilians, according to the UN Human Rights Office, between 2022 and January 2023.</p><p>How does the situation on the front line now resemble World War I and why would Russia's war strategy not have been swift and overwhelming from the start?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast, we talk about international relations, war strategies of the past and present, and peace with Hugh Strong, Professor of International Relations at the University of St. Andrews, Stephen Gethins, Practitioner Professor at the School of International Relations, and Sevgil Musayeva, Editor-in-Chief of Ukrainska Pravda.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">0564ddaa-30ab-4b37-98b4-f58bc717e0e5</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/50282267-4f74-4168-8d86-956c0dcb1f69/NBK-206-1204-ENG-converted.mp3" length="143602273" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>59:53</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>6</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>Sarah Ashton-Cirillo, American journalist, AFU paramedic: &quot;Coming back alive and destroying the Russian enemy are the only things that matter at the fronline&quot;</title><itunes:title>Sarah Ashton-Cirillo, American journalist, AFU paramedic: &quot;Coming back alive and destroying the Russian enemy are the only things that matter at the fronline&quot;</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>The episode of this podcast "(Un)Safe Country" is completely unusual for our format. We will not discuss energy, war strategy, security, or anything else. This episode is about how to see the war from the outside and inside through the prism of another person's perspective.</p><p>In this episode, our guest speaker is Sarah Ashton-Cirillo, an American journalist, war correspondent, and now a paramedic in the Ukrainian Armed Forces. She is transgender and serves in the Ukrainian army. Her story is about how she got to Ukraine, how she signed a 3-year contract with the Armed Forces, why Ukraine will win a transformative victory in this war, and why she decided to go to the front.</p><p>In the new episode of the podcast "(Un)Safe Country", we talk about the unique story of Sarah Ashton-Cirillo, a paramedic in the Armed Forces of Ukraine.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The episode of this podcast "(Un)Safe Country" is completely unusual for our format. We will not discuss energy, war strategy, security, or anything else. This episode is about how to see the war from the outside and inside through the prism of another person's perspective.</p><p>In this episode, our guest speaker is Sarah Ashton-Cirillo, an American journalist, war correspondent, and now a paramedic in the Ukrainian Armed Forces. She is transgender and serves in the Ukrainian army. Her story is about how she got to Ukraine, how she signed a 3-year contract with the Armed Forces, why Ukraine will win a transformative victory in this war, and why she decided to go to the front.</p><p>In the new episode of the podcast "(Un)Safe Country", we talk about the unique story of Sarah Ashton-Cirillo, a paramedic in the Armed Forces of Ukraine.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">06ea3899-fc68-498a-a938-b3cc0ae804e5</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/16095483-234a-4a6c-bf3f-0a592f400089/NBK-205-0404-ENG-converted.mp3" length="104869873" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>43:44</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>5</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>US Army General Wesley Kanne Clark: Putin wants to shock the West by nuclear threats and stop its supporting Ukraine</title><itunes:title>US Army General Wesley Kanne Clark: Putin wants to shock the West by nuclear threats and stop its supporting Ukraine</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Wesley Kanne Clark spent 34 years in the U.S. Army, receiving many military decorations, several honorary knighthoods, and the Presidential Medal of Freedom.&nbsp;</p><p>Clark served as the Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO from 1997 to 2000, commanding Operation Allied Force during the Kosovo War.</p><p>General Wesley Clark was among 20 of US fellow experts and national security professionals who signed open letter to the President Joe Biden and call to immediate supply of all required means to win the war with russia, including long range HIMARS (300 km range) and sufficient air defense systems.</p><p>With Gen Clark we speak in our podcast (un)Safe Country about Putin’s nuclear intimidation, how use of nuclear weapons by russia could change the war course, Ukrainian counteroffensive, sanctions against russia, support of Ukraine and how to win modern war.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wesley Kanne Clark spent 34 years in the U.S. Army, receiving many military decorations, several honorary knighthoods, and the Presidential Medal of Freedom.&nbsp;</p><p>Clark served as the Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO from 1997 to 2000, commanding Operation Allied Force during the Kosovo War.</p><p>General Wesley Clark was among 20 of US fellow experts and national security professionals who signed open letter to the President Joe Biden and call to immediate supply of all required means to win the war with russia, including long range HIMARS (300 km range) and sufficient air defense systems.</p><p>With Gen Clark we speak in our podcast (un)Safe Country about Putin’s nuclear intimidation, how use of nuclear weapons by russia could change the war course, Ukrainian counteroffensive, sanctions against russia, support of Ukraine and how to win modern war.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">608293ad-9e54-43ff-9f5f-b2f5e3632da4</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2022 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/4ad5e34e-7a30-4226-b086-317d7a546a8f/2-20new-converted.mp3" length="78118705" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>32:33</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>1</itunes:season><itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode><itunes:season>1</itunes:season><podcast:episode>2</podcast:episode><podcast:season>1</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>Pekka Kallioniemi: Elon Musk can be classified as a &quot;vatnik&quot;</title><itunes:title>Pekka Kallioniemi: Elon Musk can be classified as a &quot;vatnik&quot;</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>"First of all, Elon Musk, his company SpaceX, certainly helped Ukraine a lot when it turned on Starlink in Ukraine and sent these communication terminals there.  So people could still stay in touch with each other and so on. But since then, Elon Musk has been quite controversial in his statements. And, in fact, someone said it well that it's like watching a person become radicalized in real time, because the situation is getting worse and worse and worse in terms of what Elon Musk is promoting on Twitter/X. And if you follow this path, at some point some of the messages became quite pro-Kremlin and anti-Ukrainian, in my opinion. And I think most people would agree with that. In addition, the changes he made to the platform have made it much easier for disinformation and Kremlin propaganda to spread, and it's spreading much faster now. So it works on many levels. Obviously, he believes in these narratives himself, but he's also made it easier for other super-propagandists to spread these messages. And again, he also promotes and shares those views. So I think that's a very damaging combination of factors when it comes to Elon Musk. But basically, I think that probably the most famous example of Elon Musk sharing pro-Kremlin views is that he shared a meme about President Zelensky. Some people may have already seen it, basically about Zelensky asking for more money, and this meme shows him in a negative light. It is now quite obvious that Elon Musk can be classified as a 'vatnik,'" says the guest of the new episode, who is the founder of the Vatnik Soup Twitter project aimed at identifying the so-called super distributors of Russian propaganda in the West. </p><p>Why can people like Elon Musk be so influenced by Russian propaganda? How do Russians reach such people and how do they force them to transform? What approaches does Russia use, what key narratives does it spread on social media, and how can we counter them?</p><p><br></p><p>In the new episode of the podcast "(Un)Safe Country", its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Pekka Kallioniemi, a postdoctoral researcher, who works in the field of human-computer interaction at the University of Tampere, is an expert in social media and studies how propaganda is spread on social media and how to counter it. The conversation is about information, Russian propaganda, countering disinformation, social media, the danger of TikTok, social media, bots, trolls, and artificial intelligence.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"First of all, Elon Musk, his company SpaceX, certainly helped Ukraine a lot when it turned on Starlink in Ukraine and sent these communication terminals there.  So people could still stay in touch with each other and so on. But since then, Elon Musk has been quite controversial in his statements. And, in fact, someone said it well that it's like watching a person become radicalized in real time, because the situation is getting worse and worse and worse in terms of what Elon Musk is promoting on Twitter/X. And if you follow this path, at some point some of the messages became quite pro-Kremlin and anti-Ukrainian, in my opinion. And I think most people would agree with that. In addition, the changes he made to the platform have made it much easier for disinformation and Kremlin propaganda to spread, and it's spreading much faster now. So it works on many levels. Obviously, he believes in these narratives himself, but he's also made it easier for other super-propagandists to spread these messages. And again, he also promotes and shares those views. So I think that's a very damaging combination of factors when it comes to Elon Musk. But basically, I think that probably the most famous example of Elon Musk sharing pro-Kremlin views is that he shared a meme about President Zelensky. Some people may have already seen it, basically about Zelensky asking for more money, and this meme shows him in a negative light. It is now quite obvious that Elon Musk can be classified as a 'vatnik,'" says the guest of the new episode, who is the founder of the Vatnik Soup Twitter project aimed at identifying the so-called super distributors of Russian propaganda in the West. </p><p>Why can people like Elon Musk be so influenced by Russian propaganda? How do Russians reach such people and how do they force them to transform? What approaches does Russia use, what key narratives does it spread on social media, and how can we counter them?</p><p><br></p><p>In the new episode of the podcast "(Un)Safe Country", its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Pekka Kallioniemi, a postdoctoral researcher, who works in the field of human-computer interaction at the University of Tampere, is an expert in social media and studies how propaganda is spread on social media and how to counter it. The conversation is about information, Russian propaganda, countering disinformation, social media, the danger of TikTok, social media, bots, trolls, and artificial intelligence.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">94e98ff2-529f-4faa-9f1d-04bc8d66e6af</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/2b314a69-c820-443c-b815-01052522f76b/_kcibteD9wlEWQC4T96R_fcp.png"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/7c9d4d3e-20d0-4996-a2e5-50aefaf2086f/NBK-224-0111-ENG-converted.mp3" length="86005073" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>44:51</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>24</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>Jakub Janovsky: &quot;If either side tomorrow got air superiority, the battlefield would look different&quot;</title><itunes:title>Jakub Janovsky: &quot;If either side tomorrow got air superiority, the battlefield would look different&quot;</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>"There are many aspects that make the war in Ukraine unique in terms of analysis and conclusions that can be drawn from the war. So people definitely need to be very careful with their predictions based on what they see in Ukraine. We are seeing unique circumstances. For example, one of them is that neither side has air dominance. If one side had air superiority, the battlefield would look very different. The same can be applied to the presence or lack of certain equipment, technologies, and so on," says the guest of the new episode of the podcast "(Un)Safe Country".</p><p>What aspects make it difficult to compare the war in Ukraine with previous wars?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast, its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Jakub Janovsky, an OSINT analyst and author of research within the ORYX and BellingCat projects. The conversation is about OSINT technologies, the loss of equipment, disinformation messages, and the Oryx project.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"There are many aspects that make the war in Ukraine unique in terms of analysis and conclusions that can be drawn from the war. So people definitely need to be very careful with their predictions based on what they see in Ukraine. We are seeing unique circumstances. For example, one of them is that neither side has air dominance. If one side had air superiority, the battlefield would look very different. The same can be applied to the presence or lack of certain equipment, technologies, and so on," says the guest of the new episode of the podcast "(Un)Safe Country".</p><p>What aspects make it difficult to compare the war in Ukraine with previous wars?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast, its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Jakub Janovsky, an OSINT analyst and author of research within the ORYX and BellingCat projects. The conversation is about OSINT technologies, the loss of equipment, disinformation messages, and the Oryx project.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">add3ee93-300d-43ae-b9c1-da73d5a9a646</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/07452e19-ec00-441a-aca6-eb46e4235c4a/NBK-225-1511-ENG-converted.mp3" length="74639050" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>38:55</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>25</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>Ben Hodges: Ukraine probably is going to continue to bleed russian forces and the russians are not gaining anything</title><itunes:title>Ben Hodges: Ukraine probably is going to continue to bleed russian forces and the russians are not gaining anything</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>“Why don't people talk about Russia's failed counter-offensive? I think it's probably because the Russians themselves call it a big offensive or a big mobilization or whatever doing but it doesn't look like it. I mean there they're losing a thousand people per day getting killed in these mindless meatwave attacks and I think that Ukraine probably is going to continue to bleed Russian forces and the Russians are not gaining anything.</p><p>I don't think the Russians have the ability to knock out Ukraine. There is no big force out there waiting over the horizon to come in, that's trained and modernized it. It doesn't exist. So I think Russia's only hope is to continue what they're doing to convey the impression that they can do this forever because they see that the Western countries, at least the United States and Germany, are not fully committed to helping Ukraine actually win”.</p><p>How long will the United States hold off on approving aid to Ukraine, and why has domestic politics taken priority over the importance of supporting Ukraine?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast, its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Lt General (retired) Ben Hodges, former Commanding General of US Army Europe and NATO Senior Mentor for Logistics. The conversation is about the Black Sea, Ukraine's ground and air operations, the liberation of Crimea, US assistance and possible post-election decisions, NATO, international partners' support and position on the situation in Ukraine, the numerous conflicts unfolding in the world today and the production capabilities of Western countries, as well as what will happen inside Russia after Ukraine's victory.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Why don't people talk about Russia's failed counter-offensive? I think it's probably because the Russians themselves call it a big offensive or a big mobilization or whatever doing but it doesn't look like it. I mean there they're losing a thousand people per day getting killed in these mindless meatwave attacks and I think that Ukraine probably is going to continue to bleed Russian forces and the Russians are not gaining anything.</p><p>I don't think the Russians have the ability to knock out Ukraine. There is no big force out there waiting over the horizon to come in, that's trained and modernized it. It doesn't exist. So I think Russia's only hope is to continue what they're doing to convey the impression that they can do this forever because they see that the Western countries, at least the United States and Germany, are not fully committed to helping Ukraine actually win”.</p><p>How long will the United States hold off on approving aid to Ukraine, and why has domestic politics taken priority over the importance of supporting Ukraine?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast, its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Lt General (retired) Ben Hodges, former Commanding General of US Army Europe and NATO Senior Mentor for Logistics. The conversation is about the Black Sea, Ukraine's ground and air operations, the liberation of Crimea, US assistance and possible post-election decisions, NATO, international partners' support and position on the situation in Ukraine, the numerous conflicts unfolding in the world today and the production capabilities of Western countries, as well as what will happen inside Russia after Ukraine's victory.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">2b97080e-cede-4d50-995a-ed3066d91342</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/fa84f5c8-fbae-420a-951a-e9f85a888027/LCiJI42HpRn7TC6ZVbKz5HXR.png"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/7a76960b-e227-4a5f-8bcd-f9e8d638370d/NBK-231-2301-ENG-converted.mp3" length="77359483" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>40:20</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>31</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>Michael Kofman: Russia has probably lost a generation of officers in this war, at least</title><itunes:title>Michael Kofman: Russia has probably lost a generation of officers in this war, at least</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>“I think it's important to understand that whatever we knew about the Russian military prior to 2022, a great deal has changed. In many respects, that military is now gone. The army that Russia had, with which it invaded Ukraine, a large part of that force has been lost. The people that were in it had been lost, the officers, and a fair amount of equipment. Now, Russia hasn't suffered nearly the same losses to its aerospace forces or its Navy, but nonetheless, it's clear that there have been significant changes to the Russian military. </p><p>It's fighting with an increasingly mobilized force that consists of people who they have hired and contracted from across Russia. And it's fair to say that they probably lost a generation of officers in this war at least, and it's not clear what the future of the Russian military will be either the current leadership under Shoigu, the minister of defense and Gerasimov, the chief general staff. Both of them were quite old, they're at the end of their 60s, they've served a very, very long time. And it's clear that their impression from this war is that the problem with the Russian military is that it was not Soviet enough”, –  says the guest of the new episode of the (un)Safe Country podcast.</p><p>What has changed in the enemy's army during the war that the aggressor country has unleashed against Ukraine, and what can we expect from Russia this year?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast, its host Alina Frolova talks to Michael Kofman, a military analyst and senior fellow at the Russia and Eurasia Program of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The discussion covers the capabilities of Russia and Ukraine in the war, the assistance and support of Ukraine by the United States and Europe, the future strategy of Ukraine and its partners, possible development scenarios, the upcoming US elections and the expected outcome of the voting in Congress.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I think it's important to understand that whatever we knew about the Russian military prior to 2022, a great deal has changed. In many respects, that military is now gone. The army that Russia had, with which it invaded Ukraine, a large part of that force has been lost. The people that were in it had been lost, the officers, and a fair amount of equipment. Now, Russia hasn't suffered nearly the same losses to its aerospace forces or its Navy, but nonetheless, it's clear that there have been significant changes to the Russian military. </p><p>It's fighting with an increasingly mobilized force that consists of people who they have hired and contracted from across Russia. And it's fair to say that they probably lost a generation of officers in this war at least, and it's not clear what the future of the Russian military will be either the current leadership under Shoigu, the minister of defense and Gerasimov, the chief general staff. Both of them were quite old, they're at the end of their 60s, they've served a very, very long time. And it's clear that their impression from this war is that the problem with the Russian military is that it was not Soviet enough”, –  says the guest of the new episode of the (un)Safe Country podcast.</p><p>What has changed in the enemy's army during the war that the aggressor country has unleashed against Ukraine, and what can we expect from Russia this year?</p><p>In the new episode of the "(Un)Safe Country" podcast, its host Alina Frolova talks to Michael Kofman, a military analyst and senior fellow at the Russia and Eurasia Program of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. The discussion covers the capabilities of Russia and Ukraine in the war, the assistance and support of Ukraine by the United States and Europe, the future strategy of Ukraine and its partners, possible development scenarios, the upcoming US elections and the expected outcome of the voting in Congress.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">1ef0d887-0f52-45f6-90bb-0641b0071695</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d674f36f-a281-42c1-ad26-2a3ef358abb2/ju6ekjqT_ObvxJ3tRIj0fbWp.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/58a660b8-2ff9-4f71-a82f-831d78f895f8/NBK-232-3101-EN-converted.mp3" length="89752553" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>46:48</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>32</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>Christine Dugoin-Clément: We know that Russia is always dancing on the red lines</title><itunes:title>Christine Dugoin-Clément: We know that Russia is always dancing on the red lines</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>"The declaration of the alliance states was if ever Russia is pushing into one NATO member country, NATO will react. But if they are voluntarily pushing and we know that Russia is always dancing on the red lines. And it's a very dangerous game for everybody. I think that we had to keep in memory that each time Russia tests the limits, they did it with Georgia, they did it with Crimea, they did it in the Donbas war, using proxies and sock puppets, openly starting an invasion in Ukraine. And each time for the case that I mentioned, like Georgia, like Crimea, they observed the reaction of the Western countries. After this observation, they re-evaluate the capacity of reaction, what are the red lines and what are not. They replenish and they push a little more. And each time it is what they are doing. And this is why we are to be very careful. And this is why it has been said that Russia is a threat to the global security and that Western countries had to admit it and to keep that in mind".</p><p>What level of threat from the Russian Federation must be reached for NATO countries to start responding militarily?</p><p>In the new episode of the (un)Safe Country podcast, its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Christine Dugoin-Clément, geopolitical analyst, and associate researcher specialising in strategies of influence, cyber and AI. The conversation is about the difference between the war waged by Russia against Ukraine and the wars that took place before, the way of thinking in this war, the influence operations by Russia, France's position and attitudes towards the war in Ukraine, what needs to be done to improve the policy of defending democracy and what other countries can do to defend democracy in the cognitive plane.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The declaration of the alliance states was if ever Russia is pushing into one NATO member country, NATO will react. But if they are voluntarily pushing and we know that Russia is always dancing on the red lines. And it's a very dangerous game for everybody. I think that we had to keep in memory that each time Russia tests the limits, they did it with Georgia, they did it with Crimea, they did it in the Donbas war, using proxies and sock puppets, openly starting an invasion in Ukraine. And each time for the case that I mentioned, like Georgia, like Crimea, they observed the reaction of the Western countries. After this observation, they re-evaluate the capacity of reaction, what are the red lines and what are not. They replenish and they push a little more. And each time it is what they are doing. And this is why we are to be very careful. And this is why it has been said that Russia is a threat to the global security and that Western countries had to admit it and to keep that in mind".</p><p>What level of threat from the Russian Federation must be reached for NATO countries to start responding militarily?</p><p>In the new episode of the (un)Safe Country podcast, its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Christine Dugoin-Clément, geopolitical analyst, and associate researcher specialising in strategies of influence, cyber and AI. The conversation is about the difference between the war waged by Russia against Ukraine and the wars that took place before, the way of thinking in this war, the influence operations by Russia, France's position and attitudes towards the war in Ukraine, what needs to be done to improve the policy of defending democracy and what other countries can do to defend democracy in the cognitive plane.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">96e25206-6ee5-4d08-b095-ccb5a2ad9864</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/df7a1d36-3e83-4e77-a7ff-c08e91f8582a/gO8JaIcqXX7Vx44e-od0X6Ea.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/029b2fcd-6f90-427e-8fec-73c9a4f86895/NBK-237-2304-ENG-converted.mp3" length="78092613" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>40:43</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>38</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>38</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>Dennis Gyllensporre: I don&apos;t think NATO countries want to be seen as a part of the conflict</title><itunes:title>Dennis Gyllensporre: I don&apos;t think NATO countries want to be seen as a part of the conflict</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>"I don't think NATO countries want to be seen as a part of the conflict. And that's not helpful either. The important part is for them to be committed to setting conditions for Ukraine to be successful and provide the support needed. This is a process that takes a lot of time. From where I stand, I see also in this area of progress, but, I mean Ukraine is in an urgent situation now for additional support. Again, the process of decision-making is not keeping up with what is needed in support of a successful Ukrainian campaign". </p><p>Is the Alliance ready to change its perception of non-involvement in the conflict, considering that Russian missiles targeting Ukraine are periodically entering NATO airspace?</p><p>In the new episode of the podcast "(un)Safe Country", its host Alina Frolova talks to Lieutenant General (ret.) Dr Dennis Gyllensporre, Associate Professor in Security Policy and Strategy at the Swedish Defence University, Force Commander of the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilisation Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) from 2018 to 2021. The conversation is about the prospects of Ukraine's victory, weapons and tactics of war, the United States and Sweden, NATO and its role in the Black Sea region, and the prospects for the deployment of foreign troops in Ukraine.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I don't think NATO countries want to be seen as a part of the conflict. And that's not helpful either. The important part is for them to be committed to setting conditions for Ukraine to be successful and provide the support needed. This is a process that takes a lot of time. From where I stand, I see also in this area of progress, but, I mean Ukraine is in an urgent situation now for additional support. Again, the process of decision-making is not keeping up with what is needed in support of a successful Ukrainian campaign". </p><p>Is the Alliance ready to change its perception of non-involvement in the conflict, considering that Russian missiles targeting Ukraine are periodically entering NATO airspace?</p><p>In the new episode of the podcast "(un)Safe Country", its host Alina Frolova talks to Lieutenant General (ret.) Dr Dennis Gyllensporre, Associate Professor in Security Policy and Strategy at the Swedish Defence University, Force Commander of the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilisation Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) from 2018 to 2021. The conversation is about the prospects of Ukraine's victory, weapons and tactics of war, the United States and Sweden, NATO and its role in the Black Sea region, and the prospects for the deployment of foreign troops in Ukraine.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">d783998e-377c-490b-acd9-96e1f6b64b53</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/6d8b0ebb-dd55-4bcc-b1f5-3aebe275dea0/Gb5JI7G9GEqRw-7ORuBXRXDA.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/fc8ec5ae-dc77-4c5e-b6c8-ffd0783b1b43/NBK-238-0305-ENG.mp3" length="44840315" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>31:08</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>39</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>39</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item><item><title>Givi Chanukvadze: “We have never seen in Georgia these amounts of people ready to openly say ‘no’ to Russia”</title><itunes:title>Givi Chanukvadze: “We have never seen in Georgia these amounts of people ready to openly say ‘no’ to Russia”</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>“In terms of the protests and the amount of people that we see, I should say that for Georgia to have around 300,000 people coming out in the streets –&nbsp;it's unprecedented. We've never seen in Georgia these amounts of people being ready to openly say no to Russia and this is about that. The idea is that it's not only about Russian law and we all understand that this is just a component of a bigger strategy of a larger picture that we've been seeing especially after 2012.</p><p>I think we should see these particular developments in the big picture. The Russian law, so-called law about foreign agents –&nbsp;it's one aspect of a bigger problem that Georgia has been facing historically and since its independence. We know that, we've been fighting our northern neighbour for generations so this is nothing new for any of us. </p><p>We know exactly with whom we are fighting. The realisation that Georgia is in its existential phase is clear. However, the government propaganda is still working very well and many things should be done on that front in order to counter those narratives that are coming from government propaganda channels” – says the guest of the new episode of the “(un)Safe Country” podcast.</p><p>What is the attitude of the active part of Georgian citizens and what is the current situation of the country's authorities?</p><p>In the new episode of the (Un)Safe Country podcast, its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Givi Chanukvadze, an international development expert and associate professor at Ilia State University in Tbilisi. The conversation covers the latest developments in Georgia, high civic activity, Georgian attitudes towards Russians, manipulations on the topic of the war with Russia, the influence of the Georgian Orthodox Church, and possible scenarios for the future of Georgia.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“In terms of the protests and the amount of people that we see, I should say that for Georgia to have around 300,000 people coming out in the streets –&nbsp;it's unprecedented. We've never seen in Georgia these amounts of people being ready to openly say no to Russia and this is about that. The idea is that it's not only about Russian law and we all understand that this is just a component of a bigger strategy of a larger picture that we've been seeing especially after 2012.</p><p>I think we should see these particular developments in the big picture. The Russian law, so-called law about foreign agents –&nbsp;it's one aspect of a bigger problem that Georgia has been facing historically and since its independence. We know that, we've been fighting our northern neighbour for generations so this is nothing new for any of us. </p><p>We know exactly with whom we are fighting. The realisation that Georgia is in its existential phase is clear. However, the government propaganda is still working very well and many things should be done on that front in order to counter those narratives that are coming from government propaganda channels” – says the guest of the new episode of the “(un)Safe Country” podcast.</p><p>What is the attitude of the active part of Georgian citizens and what is the current situation of the country's authorities?</p><p>In the new episode of the (Un)Safe Country podcast, its permanent host Alina Frolova talks to Givi Chanukvadze, an international development expert and associate professor at Ilia State University in Tbilisi. The conversation covers the latest developments in Georgia, high civic activity, Georgian attitudes towards Russians, manipulations on the topic of the war with Russia, the influence of the Georgian Orthodox Church, and possible scenarios for the future of Georgia.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://savecountry.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">b177a3f4-aadc-4126-a369-6780cdcb7e11</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/d9756f50-aac5-4e22-95d3-6c28ddbdde0e/QD6KysdCBfNVjpTiUO47B2Q4.jpg"/><dc:creator><![CDATA[Українська правда]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 09:00:00 +0300</pubDate><enclosure url="https://podcasts.captivate.fm/media/5e64e168-90ac-4d49-b4bd-d941c1038c94/NBK-000-3105-ENG-NEW.mp3" length="95346240" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>39:44</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><itunes:episode>42</itunes:episode><itunes:season>2</itunes:season><podcast:episode>42</podcast:episode><podcast:season>2</podcast:season><itunes:author>Українська правда</itunes:author></item></channel></rss>