<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://feeds.captivate.fm/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"><channel><atom:link href="https://feeds.captivate.fm/stubborn-things/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><title><![CDATA[Stubborn Things]]></title><podcast:guid>306da029-cb17-5503-8296-b0227e6e343a</podcast:guid><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><generator>Captivate.fm</generator><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><copyright><![CDATA[Copyright 2026 AEI Podcasts]]></copyright><managingEditor>AEI Podcasts</managingEditor><itunes:summary><![CDATA[John Adams famously said: “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." In this era of knee-jerk partisanship and ideological posturing, Adams's warning is as important as ever. Tune in every other week as AEI's Jay Cost and Sean Trende draw on their wide-ranging base of knowledge and stubborn commitment to the evidence to understand what is happening in the world of American politics.]]></itunes:summary><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/75eceb28-1119-43a7-b2cd-f53e4d99f79c/Stubborn-Things-logo.png"/><itunes:owner><itunes:name>AEI Podcasts</itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author>AEI Podcasts</itunes:author><description>John Adams famously said: “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.&quot; In this era of knee-jerk partisanship and ideological posturing, Adams&apos;s warning is as important as ever. Tune in every other week as AEI&apos;s Jay Cost and Sean Trende draw on their wide-ranging base of knowledge and stubborn commitment to the evidence to understand what is happening in the world of American politics.</description><link>https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm</link><atom:link href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" rel="hub"/><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><itunes:category text="Government"></itunes:category><itunes:category text="History"></itunes:category><itunes:category text="News"><itunes:category text="Politics"/></itunes:category><podcast:locked>no</podcast:locked><podcast:medium>podcast</podcast:medium><item><title>Special Edition: Presidential Tiers</title><itunes:title>Special Edition: Presidential Tiers</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>This week, our hosts take a break from talking about the drama of 21st century American politics and turn back the clock. In this very special edition of Stubborn Things, Jay and Sean start the Very Official Stubborn Things Presidential Tiers List. They start, of course, with Washington and make it all the way through Buchanan. See where Jay and Sean agree and where their lists diverge. Take a listen and let us know what you think about our tiers!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p><p>Show notes:</p><p><a href="https://www.aei.org/research-products/book/james-madison-americas-first-politician/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jay’s biography of James Madison</a></p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, our hosts take a break from talking about the drama of 21st century American politics and turn back the clock. In this very special edition of Stubborn Things, Jay and Sean start the Very Official Stubborn Things Presidential Tiers List. They start, of course, with Washington and make it all the way through Buchanan. See where Jay and Sean agree and where their lists diverge. Take a listen and let us know what you think about our tiers!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p><p>Show notes:</p><p><a href="https://www.aei.org/research-products/book/james-madison-americas-first-politician/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jay’s biography of James Madison</a></p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">c921a831-dc1f-419f-8318-fcb77df4e18d</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/75eceb28-1119-43a7-b2cd-f53e4d99f79c/Stubborn-Things-logo.png"/><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/c921a831-dc1f-419f-8318-fcb77df4e18d.mp3" length="60824040" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>01:03:21</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>SAVEing the Voting Discourse</title><itunes:title>SAVEing the Voting Discourse</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>Our Stubborn Things hosts this week talk voting and the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, a.k.a. the SAVE Act, a.k.a. the SAVE America Act, currently making its way through Congress. Jay and Sean discuss how the bill would change voting, the advantages and challenges with requiring proof of citizenship to vote, and the bad faith arguments each camp makes about the bill. Then, they go back in time to review the 2021 Democrat-led For the People Act, and Sean calls Jay old. Finally, the episode wraps with a focus on campaign finance and the role of big money in elections.</p><p>Take a listen and let us know what you think!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>. </p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p><p>Show notes:</p><p><a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/22" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">H.R.22 – SAVE Act</a></p><p><a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/nationalizing-elections-is-a-very-bad-idea-as-it-was-when-democrats-tried-it/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Yuval Levin’s </a><em><a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/nationalizing-elections-is-a-very-bad-idea-as-it-was-when-democrats-tried-it/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">National Review</a></em><a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/nationalizing-elections-is-a-very-bad-idea-as-it-was-when-democrats-tried-it/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"> article</a></p><p><em><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/us/billionaires-federal-election-campaign-contributions.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">NYT </a></em><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/us/billionaires-federal-election-campaign-contributions.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">article about campaign finance</a></p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Stubborn Things hosts this week talk voting and the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, a.k.a. the SAVE Act, a.k.a. the SAVE America Act, currently making its way through Congress. Jay and Sean discuss how the bill would change voting, the advantages and challenges with requiring proof of citizenship to vote, and the bad faith arguments each camp makes about the bill. Then, they go back in time to review the 2021 Democrat-led For the People Act, and Sean calls Jay old. Finally, the episode wraps with a focus on campaign finance and the role of big money in elections.</p><p>Take a listen and let us know what you think!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>. </p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p><p>Show notes:</p><p><a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/22" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">H.R.22 – SAVE Act</a></p><p><a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/nationalizing-elections-is-a-very-bad-idea-as-it-was-when-democrats-tried-it/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Yuval Levin’s </a><em><a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/nationalizing-elections-is-a-very-bad-idea-as-it-was-when-democrats-tried-it/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">National Review</a></em><a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/nationalizing-elections-is-a-very-bad-idea-as-it-was-when-democrats-tried-it/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"> article</a></p><p><em><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/us/billionaires-federal-election-campaign-contributions.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">NYT </a></em><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/09/us/billionaires-federal-election-campaign-contributions.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">article about campaign finance</a></p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">029deeb9-7f25-480e-86df-a9928f8be326</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/75eceb28-1119-43a7-b2cd-f53e4d99f79c/Stubborn-Things-logo.png"/><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 07:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/029deeb9-7f25-480e-86df-a9928f8be326.mp3" length="52733604" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:56</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Can Talarico Turn Texas Blue?</title><itunes:title>Can Talarico Turn Texas Blue?</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>This week, Jay and Sean tackle the results of the Senate primary in Texas. They discuss James Talarico’s victory in the Democratic primary and the religious dimension of Talarico’s candidacy. They also assess the strengths and weaknesses of Talarico’s two potential GOP opponents, incumbent John Cornyn and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who will face each other in a runoff in May, as well as how Texas demographics may play in the general election. Plus, Jay and Sean dip into the mailbag and answer a listener question about the books that have influenced them. Take a listen and let us know what you think!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p><p>Show notes:</p><p>Sean’s Recommendations:</p><p><em><a href="https://www.thealmanacofamericanpolitics.com/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Almanac of American Politics</a></em></p><p><em><a href="https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300093650/electoral-realignments/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Electoral Realignments</a></em>, by David Mayhew</p><p><em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Emerging-Democratic-Majority-John-Judis/dp/0743254783" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Emerging Democratic Majority</a></em>, by John Judis and Ruy Teixeira</p><p>Jay’s Recommendations:</p><p><em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Conjectures-Refutations-Scientific-Knowledge-Routledge/dp/0415285941" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Conjectures and Refutations</a></em>, by Karl Popper</p><p><em><a href="https://wwnorton.com/books/Micromotives-and-Macrobehavior/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Micromotives and Macrobehavior</a></em>, by Thomas Schelling</p><p><em><a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/260920/reflections-on-the-revolution-in-france-by-edmund-burke/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Reflections on the Revolution in France</a></em>, by Edmund Burke</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, Jay and Sean tackle the results of the Senate primary in Texas. They discuss James Talarico’s victory in the Democratic primary and the religious dimension of Talarico’s candidacy. They also assess the strengths and weaknesses of Talarico’s two potential GOP opponents, incumbent John Cornyn and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who will face each other in a runoff in May, as well as how Texas demographics may play in the general election. Plus, Jay and Sean dip into the mailbag and answer a listener question about the books that have influenced them. Take a listen and let us know what you think!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p><p>Show notes:</p><p>Sean’s Recommendations:</p><p><em><a href="https://www.thealmanacofamericanpolitics.com/index.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Almanac of American Politics</a></em></p><p><em><a href="https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300093650/electoral-realignments/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Electoral Realignments</a></em>, by David Mayhew</p><p><em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Emerging-Democratic-Majority-John-Judis/dp/0743254783" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Emerging Democratic Majority</a></em>, by John Judis and Ruy Teixeira</p><p>Jay’s Recommendations:</p><p><em><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Conjectures-Refutations-Scientific-Knowledge-Routledge/dp/0415285941" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Conjectures and Refutations</a></em>, by Karl Popper</p><p><em><a href="https://wwnorton.com/books/Micromotives-and-Macrobehavior/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Micromotives and Macrobehavior</a></em>, by Thomas Schelling</p><p><em><a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/260920/reflections-on-the-revolution-in-france-by-edmund-burke/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Reflections on the Revolution in France</a></em>, by Edmund Burke</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">19f1b021-4723-425e-9e03-7a301409786a</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/75eceb28-1119-43a7-b2cd-f53e4d99f79c/Stubborn-Things-logo.png"/><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 07:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/19f1b021-4723-425e-9e03-7a301409786a.mp3" length="57948481" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>01:00:22</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Major Questions About the Supreme Court</title><itunes:title>Major Questions About the Supreme Court</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>AEI’s Jay Cost and Sean Trende talk about the topic on everyone’s mind this week: the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in <em>Learning Resources v. Trump</em>, which struck down President Trump’s use of tariffs under IEEPA. Throughout the episode, our hosts touch on the majority opinion, as well as the various concurrences and dissents, that came down last Friday. Jay and Sean address the history of tariffs in American political economy before moving on to a conversation about the separation of powers. They wrap up by discussing the ideological makeup of the Court and this case’s implications for questions of checks and balances. Take a listen and let us know what you think!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p><p>Show notes:</p><p><a href="https://www.aei.org/op-eds/reining-in-the-courts/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jay’s review of </a><em><a href="https://www.aei.org/op-eds/reining-in-the-courts/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Constitution of Conflict</a></em></p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AEI’s Jay Cost and Sean Trende talk about the topic on everyone’s mind this week: the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in <em>Learning Resources v. Trump</em>, which struck down President Trump’s use of tariffs under IEEPA. Throughout the episode, our hosts touch on the majority opinion, as well as the various concurrences and dissents, that came down last Friday. Jay and Sean address the history of tariffs in American political economy before moving on to a conversation about the separation of powers. They wrap up by discussing the ideological makeup of the Court and this case’s implications for questions of checks and balances. Take a listen and let us know what you think!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p><p>Show notes:</p><p><a href="https://www.aei.org/op-eds/reining-in-the-courts/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jay’s review of </a><em><a href="https://www.aei.org/op-eds/reining-in-the-courts/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Constitution of Conflict</a></em></p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">327e0254-93ca-49c3-a2b6-e8b59abb0043</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/75eceb28-1119-43a7-b2cd-f53e4d99f79c/Stubborn-Things-logo.png"/><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/327e0254-93ca-49c3-a2b6-e8b59abb0043.mp3" length="53891351" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>56:08</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>In Defense of the Filibuster</title><itunes:title>In Defense of the Filibuster</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>On this week’s episode, Jay and Sean continue their focus on the Senate. In particular, they talk about the formation, history, and modern uses of the filibuster. Our hosts explain the rationale for the filibuster before addressing several criticisms of the procedure. In the second segment, Jay and Sean address the unexpected effectiveness Mike Johnson has shown as Speaker of the House. Take a listen!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this week’s episode, Jay and Sean continue their focus on the Senate. In particular, they talk about the formation, history, and modern uses of the filibuster. Our hosts explain the rationale for the filibuster before addressing several criticisms of the procedure. In the second segment, Jay and Sean address the unexpected effectiveness Mike Johnson has shown as Speaker of the House. Take a listen!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">0dcf3220-7303-45ec-8f03-f0607d747e8c</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/75eceb28-1119-43a7-b2cd-f53e4d99f79c/Stubborn-Things-logo.png"/><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 07:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/0dcf3220-7303-45ec-8f03-f0607d747e8c.mp3" length="71121456" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>49:23</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Radicalism, Instability, and a Dysfunctional Senate</title><itunes:title>Radicalism, Instability, and a Dysfunctional Senate</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>This week, Jay and Sean zoom out from the ongoing immigration enforcement debate to talk about the history and politics of immigration. In the spirit of Stubborn Things, Jay and Sean try to make sense of various views – right, left, and center – on immigration and discuss the radical politics that prevents compromise and consensus. During the second half of the episode, they talk about Senate dysfunction and the upcoming Senate election in Texas. Take a listen!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, Jay and Sean zoom out from the ongoing immigration enforcement debate to talk about the history and politics of immigration. In the spirit of Stubborn Things, Jay and Sean try to make sense of various views – right, left, and center – on immigration and discuss the radical politics that prevents compromise and consensus. During the second half of the episode, they talk about Senate dysfunction and the upcoming Senate election in Texas. Take a listen!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">78851e84-2452-4971-8d1c-ca01dc0493ce</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/75eceb28-1119-43a7-b2cd-f53e4d99f79c/Stubborn-Things-logo.png"/><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 07:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/78851e84-2452-4971-8d1c-ca01dc0493ce.mp3" length="52660043" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>54:51</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>From the Halls of Caracas to the Shores of Tripoli</title><itunes:title>From the Halls of Caracas to the Shores of Tripoli</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>This week, Jay and Sean talk the Donroe Doctrine. They address the centuries-old historical precedent of American military intervention in the Western Hemisphere and analyze how the Trump admiration's forays into Venezuela fit into this story. On the second half of the episode, Jay interviews Sean about his experiences as an election lawyer and congressional map-drawing extraordinaire. Take a listen!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, Jay and Sean talk the Donroe Doctrine. They address the centuries-old historical precedent of American military intervention in the Western Hemisphere and analyze how the Trump admiration's forays into Venezuela fit into this story. On the second half of the episode, Jay interviews Sean about his experiences as an election lawyer and congressional map-drawing extraordinaire. Take a listen!</p><p>Remember to rate and follow Stubborn Things and stay up to date by following us on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:StubbornThings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">StubbornThings@aei.org</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">51294317-bbd3-445f-9006-7f943c8306e6</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/75eceb28-1119-43a7-b2cd-f53e4d99f79c/Stubborn-Things-logo.png"/><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 07:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/51294317-bbd3-445f-9006-7f943c8306e6.mp3" length="50394286" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>52:30</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Elections Galore</title><itunes:title>Elections Galore</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>On Stubborn Things’ first episode of 2026, Jay and Sean talk about elections both past and future. How will President Trump’s approval rating, partisan redistricting, and other factors affect the outcome of the midterms this November? Our hosts discuss whether the midterm results <em>and </em>the results of the 2028 GOP presidential primary are foregone conclusions. Plus, how do current election procedures differ from ones of centuries past, and why are some Americans prohibited from getting drunk on election day? Come for an analysis of JD Vance’s 2028 odds, stay for Sean’s humming of The Imperial March.</p><p>To stay up to date with all things ST, follow Stubborn Things on your favorite podcast platform and follow the podcast on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:stubbornthings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">stubbornthings@aei.org</a>.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Stubborn Things’ first episode of 2026, Jay and Sean talk about elections both past and future. How will President Trump’s approval rating, partisan redistricting, and other factors affect the outcome of the midterms this November? Our hosts discuss whether the midterm results <em>and </em>the results of the 2028 GOP presidential primary are foregone conclusions. Plus, how do current election procedures differ from ones of centuries past, and why are some Americans prohibited from getting drunk on election day? Come for an analysis of JD Vance’s 2028 odds, stay for Sean’s humming of The Imperial March.</p><p>To stay up to date with all things ST, follow Stubborn Things on your favorite podcast platform and follow the podcast on X <a href="https://x.com/aei_STpodcast" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@aei_STpodcast</a>.</p><p>Comments? Suggestions? Email us at <a href="mailto:stubbornthings@aei.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">stubbornthings@aei.org</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">093dd58e-b971-4098-a8e6-0658f702b7d9</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/75eceb28-1119-43a7-b2cd-f53e4d99f79c/Stubborn-Things-logo.png"/><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 08:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/093dd58e-b971-4098-a8e6-0658f702b7d9.mp3" length="49820010" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>51:54</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>How Much Executive Power Will President Stephen A. Smith Have?</title><itunes:title>How Much Executive Power Will President Stephen A. Smith Have?</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>On this week’s episode of Stubborn Things, Jay Cost and Sean Trende recap the oral argument before the Supreme Court  in <em>Trump v. Slaughter</em> and present an overview of the political history, legal cases, and theories of executive power that have led the Court to this point. Plus, our hosts kick off the way-too-early speculation about who might be the Democratic nominee for President in 2028. Will it be Gavin Newsom? AOC? Someone else? Take a listen to hear what Jay and Sean think.</p><p>Show notes:</p><ul><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/25-332" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Trump v. Slaughter</em></a></li><li><a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/272us52" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Myers v. United States</em></a></li><li><a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/295us602" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Humphrey's Executor v. United States</em></a></li><li><a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/487/654/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Justice Scalia’s dissent in <em>Morrison v. Olson</em></a></li><li><a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2139277?seq=1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Woodrow Wilson: The Study of Administration</a></li><li><a href="https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/how-congress-lost-part-ix-resilient-corruption-and-an-emerging-progressive-critique-in-the-late-19th-century/#scrollSection3" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jay’s recent AEI report on Wilson’s early views on regulation</a> </li></ul><br/>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this week’s episode of Stubborn Things, Jay Cost and Sean Trende recap the oral argument before the Supreme Court  in <em>Trump v. Slaughter</em> and present an overview of the political history, legal cases, and theories of executive power that have led the Court to this point. Plus, our hosts kick off the way-too-early speculation about who might be the Democratic nominee for President in 2028. Will it be Gavin Newsom? AOC? Someone else? Take a listen to hear what Jay and Sean think.</p><p>Show notes:</p><ul><li><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/25-332" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Trump v. Slaughter</em></a></li><li><a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/272us52" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Myers v. United States</em></a></li><li><a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/295us602" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><em>Humphrey's Executor v. United States</em></a></li><li><a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/487/654/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Justice Scalia’s dissent in <em>Morrison v. Olson</em></a></li><li><a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2139277?seq=1" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Woodrow Wilson: The Study of Administration</a></li><li><a href="https://www.aei.org/research-products/report/how-congress-lost-part-ix-resilient-corruption-and-an-emerging-progressive-critique-in-the-late-19th-century/#scrollSection3" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Jay’s recent AEI report on Wilson’s early views on regulation</a> </li></ul><br/>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">f612ce5c-a5ed-4690-a843-911bd50a6229</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/75eceb28-1119-43a7-b2cd-f53e4d99f79c/Stubborn-Things-logo.png"/><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 07:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/f612ce5c-a5ed-4690-a843-911bd50a6229.mp3" length="44050032" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>52:26</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Gerrymania</title><itunes:title>Gerrymania</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>In the very first episode of Stubborn Things, Jay Cost and Sean Trende kick off with a deep dive into gerrymandering. This year alone, 10 states have redistricted or are in the process of doing so, often with overt partisan aims. In a statewide election last month, California approved a new congressional map to favor Democrats. In September, the governor of Missouri signed that state's new map — passed by a state house and senate featuring supermajority Republican control — into law, a move that is projected to boost Republican candidates. And over at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the President referred to Indiana Republicans who (at least initially) resisted the pressure to gerrymander as "RINOs" and called for them to be primaried. To unpack all of this and more, Cost and Trende explore the origins of gerrymandering and connect the historical, partisan, and legal dots that make up the story of American congressional redistricting.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the very first episode of Stubborn Things, Jay Cost and Sean Trende kick off with a deep dive into gerrymandering. This year alone, 10 states have redistricted or are in the process of doing so, often with overt partisan aims. In a statewide election last month, California approved a new congressional map to favor Democrats. In September, the governor of Missouri signed that state's new map — passed by a state house and senate featuring supermajority Republican control — into law, a move that is projected to boost Republican candidates. And over at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the President referred to Indiana Republicans who (at least initially) resisted the pressure to gerrymander as "RINOs" and called for them to be primaried. To unpack all of this and more, Cost and Trende explore the origins of gerrymandering and connect the historical, partisan, and legal dots that make up the story of American congressional redistricting.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">db9242d0-067b-4392-b678-a90d48207d15</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/75eceb28-1119-43a7-b2cd-f53e4d99f79c/Stubborn-Things-logo.png"/><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/db9242d0-067b-4392-b678-a90d48207d15.mp3" length="53921444" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>56:10</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title>Introducing: Stubborn Things</title><itunes:title>Introducing: Stubborn Things</itunes:title><description><![CDATA[<p>The American Enterprise Institute is pleased to present a new podcast: Stubborn Things, hosted by Gerald R. Ford Nonresident Senior Fellow Jay Cost and by Nonresident Fellow Sean Trende.</p><p>John Adams famously said: “Facts are stubborn things. Whatever our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." In this era of knee-jerk partisanship and ideological posturing, Adams's warning is as important as ever. Tune in to Stubborn Things every other week as Cost and Trende draw on their wide-ranging base of knowledge and stubborn commitment to the evidence to understand what is happening in the world of American politics.</p><p>Enjoy this trailer, in which Cost and Trende preview what is to come.</p><p>Produced by Michael Schwartz.</p>]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Enterprise Institute is pleased to present a new podcast: Stubborn Things, hosted by Gerald R. Ford Nonresident Senior Fellow Jay Cost and by Nonresident Fellow Sean Trende.</p><p>John Adams famously said: “Facts are stubborn things. Whatever our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." In this era of knee-jerk partisanship and ideological posturing, Adams's warning is as important as ever. Tune in to Stubborn Things every other week as Cost and Trende draw on their wide-ranging base of knowledge and stubborn commitment to the evidence to understand what is happening in the world of American politics.</p><p>Enjoy this trailer, in which Cost and Trende preview what is to come.</p><p>Produced by Michael Schwartz.</p>]]></content:encoded><link><![CDATA[https://stubborn-things.captivate.fm]]></link><guid isPermaLink="false">b91fe08a-fe09-4a05-8eaa-a9478cd49e65</guid><itunes:image href="https://artwork.captivate.fm/75eceb28-1119-43a7-b2cd-f53e4d99f79c/Stubborn-Things-logo.png"/><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 08:30:00 -0400</pubDate><enclosure url="https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/b91fe08a-fe09-4a05-8eaa-a9478cd49e65.mp3" length="2475250" type="audio/mpeg"/><itunes:duration>02:35</itunes:duration><itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item></channel></rss>